![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My website "http:\\www.hyperonsoft.com" contains an outline of a new
space program, complete with two mars Society Convention papers and some trajectory software downloads. I am opening a thread to get some discussion underway on this subject. So far all my attempts to obtain funding for research on the outline have been unsuccessful. I consider this to be bad management. My suggestions should have been properly investigated years ago. I have a certificate of appreciation (1990) from the Stafford committee substantiating this claim. NASA should be challenged to produce the best possible program. At this point, I think there is cause to argue that it has committed itself to producing the worst possible. One topic of great interest is whether variable geometry subsonic ramjets can be used in a two cycle first stage. An email I received from a participant in the NGLV study suggested that they had considered ejectors, and rejected them. I had rejected multicyle engines; but a two-cycle stage has yet to receive proper evaluation, as far as I know (although the NGLV study apparently gave it some consideration). martin dowd |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 2nd 05 04:13 AM |
JimO writings on shuttle disaster, recovery | Jim Oberg | History | 0 | July 11th 05 06:32 PM |
JimO writings on shuttle disaster, recovery | Jim Oberg | Policy | 0 | July 11th 05 06:32 PM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Boeing Establishes Orbital Space Program Office | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | November 3rd 03 10:23 PM |