![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
See http://hubblesite.org/news/2005/28/full
I hope it's a little bug in the Big Planetarium simulation... If it's real how to explain it without big changes in standard theory? Luigi Caselli |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:37:11 GMT
"Luigi Caselli" wrote: See http://hubblesite.org/news/2005/28/full I hope it's a little bug in the Big Planetarium simulation... If it's real how to explain it without big changes in standard theory? Luigi Caselli I just postet a link to this as well, I didn't read the group first ;-) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eliot?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nightbat wrote
Luigi Caselli wrote: See http://hubblesite.org/news/2005/28/full I hope it's a little bug in the Big Planetarium simulation... If it's real how to explain it without big changes in standard theory? Luigi Caselli nightbat Yes, Officer Luigi, I previously explained the flaw and nulling aspect of the Big Bang theory was its point everywhere energy beginning premise. I have long indicated contrary mathematical BB proof indications using My cosmos Universal model of the nightbat " Black Comet " dynamics net relayed understanding. carry on, the nightbat |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nightbat wrote:
nightbat wrote Luigi Caselli wrote: See http://hubblesite.org/news/2005/28/full I hope it's a little bug in the Big Planetarium simulation... If it's real how to explain it without big changes in standard theory? Luigi Caselli nightbat Yes, Officer Luigi, I previously explained the flaw and nulling aspect of the Big Bang theory was its point everywhere energy beginning premise. I have long indicated contrary mathematical BB proof indications using My cosmos Universal model of the nightbat " Black Comet " dynamics net relayed understanding. I think it might be amusing to see whatever the hell you're so incoherently claiming to have produced. I expect to see a sprinkling of "big words" that you don't know in a stew of unintelligible twaddle. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Griffin wrote:
nightbat wrote: nightbat wrote Luigi Caselli wrote: See http://hubblesite.org/news/2005/28/full I hope it's a little bug in the Big Planetarium simulation... If it's real how to explain it without big changes in standard theory? Luigi Caselli nightbat Yes, Officer Luigi, I previously explained the flaw and nulling aspect of the Big Bang theory was its point everywhere energy beginning premise. I have long indicated contrary mathematical BB proof indications using My cosmos Universal model of the nightbat " Black Comet " dynamics net relayed understanding. I think it might be amusing to see whatever the hell you're so incoherently claiming to have produced. I expect to see a sprinkling of "big words" that you don't know in a stew of unintelligible twaddle. He is writing or has written a textbook that explains everything about "black comets" that will be a bestseller on Amazon, but no one can see it because that would be telling. -- Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler "The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with both male and female genitalia." "Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core." -- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|