A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Space ist just a giant ocean!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 16th 05, 06:40 AM
Ted Ratmark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Space ist just a giant ocean!

Yes, dark matter is the water of space and planets, suns are just bubbles in
space.Black holes are interstellar drainpipes.

We must build space-submarines to travel through space and avoid
space-kraken.


  #2  
Old September 16th 05, 08:09 AM
nightbat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nightbat wrote

Ted Ratmark wrote:

Yes, dark matter is the water of space and planets, suns are just bubbles in
space.Black holes are interstellar drainpipes.

We must build space-submarines to travel through space and avoid
space-kraken.


nightbat

Your fundamental brief assertion of space is close and however
there are no real world space black holes for they are nightbat profound
deduced " Black Comets ". We presently Earth do not have the advanced
technology to build capable human occupied long distance Starships at
this time but our reported net Darla Star Race does. I have been
honorary awarded one in my name and am just waiting for Star Race beauty
Sil for hopeful final pick-up. I would like to further net enlighten you
as to where you are close but the nightbat science book(s) should be
coming out soon which will do that. Fear not for your input is welcomed
because it shows proper tuned searching logic and astronomy applied
mental cells working in the right direction.

cheers,
the nightbat
  #3  
Old September 16th 05, 05:53 PM
Art Deco
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nightbat wrote:

nightbat wrote

Ted Ratmark wrote:

Yes, dark matter is the water of space and planets, suns are just bubbles in
space.Black holes are interstellar drainpipes.

We must build space-submarines to travel through space and avoid
space-kraken.


nightbat

Your fundamental brief assertion of space is close and however
there are no real world space black holes for they are nightbat profound
deduced " Black Comets ". We presently Earth do not have the advanced
technology to build capable human occupied long distance Starships at
this time but our reported net Darla Star Race does. I have been
honorary awarded one in my name and am just waiting for Star Race beauty
Sil for hopeful final pick-up. I would like to further net enlighten you
as to where you are close but the nightbat science book(s) should be
coming out soon which will do that. Fear not for your input is welcomed
because it shows proper tuned searching logic and astronomy applied
mental cells working in the right direction.

cheers,
the nightbat


Another fine campaign speech! Babble on!

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler

"The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with
both male and female genitalia."

"Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun
with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core."

-- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004
  #4  
Old September 23rd 05, 12:43 AM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Reality is space is a three dimensional field. Its structure of the
field is lines of force going in every possible dimension. We are
immersed in this structure. We help make up this structure. We act upon
this structure,and it acts upon us. The structure is so close its
right under our nose Oops it is our nose (go figure?) beert

  #6  
Old September 24th 05, 01:39 PM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Saul Or visa versa Bert

  #7  
Old September 25th 05, 11:22 PM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Its always ironic when Einstien's thinking fits with QM He did more to
make QM reality than Bohr. He had the view of Aether as a field,and QM
uses a field for aether structure too. Beert

  #8  
Old September 26th 05, 12:05 AM
nightbat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nightbat wrote

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:

Its always ironic when Einstien's thinking fits with QM He did more to
make QM reality than Bohr. He had the view of Aether as a field,and QM
uses a field for aether structure too. Beert


nightbat

Correct Officer Bert and hello. Yes, and only the once MM base
searched for physical Aether field is null not the Dr. Einstein though
rejected invisible sub Planck energy one as perceived by him at first as
too intricate. While he mathematically ushered in the quantum physics
reality he rejected it as meta physical based. He whole life preferably
searched for a physical resolution to Universal GUT field dynamics. The
base unifying energy field is however sub quantum based and mathematical
proof explicit in its indestructibility and non finite reality. The
unified frame has never existed in our life times for comparative
analysis or correlating field theory unification.

/\ = TS4 nightbat GUT Formula
/\ = is for total base energy equalized field---non present existing
T = is total
S = space
4 = times 4 dimensions

With the disclosed mirror reverse of = right equation equating to space
time multiplied 4

ponder on,
the nightbat
  #9  
Old September 26th 05, 12:44 PM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi nightbat "FIELDS" That's the rub. Fields that give friction to inner
space(Planck space) Always liked Hawking's definition of
a field.It went like this. "Something that exists throughout space and
time,as opposed to a particle that exists only one point at a
time".(profound (yes) Funny thing nightbat I can't remember reading
how "string theory" uses fields??? Hmmm. Well I use Fields in a lot of
my thinking in Planck spacetime,and yet I leave out any field or wave
when thinking gravity. Go figure Bert

  #10  
Old September 26th 05, 04:09 PM
Double-A
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Hi nightbat "FIELDS" That's the rub. Fields that give friction to inner
space(Planck space) Always liked Hawking's definition of
a field.It went like this. "Something that exists throughout space and
time,as opposed to a particle that exists only one point at a
time".(profound (yes) Funny thing nightbat I can't remember reading
how "string theory" uses fields??? Hmmm. Well I use Fields in a lot of
my thinking in Planck spacetime,and yet I leave out any field or wave
when thinking gravity. Go figure Bert



But particles such as electrons have electric fields that are part and
parcel of their existence. The attraction any electron has for a
proton or a positron diminishes as the inverse of the square of the
distance, but never completely extinguishes. So each electron must
extend over all of the universe!

Double-A

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) Stuf4 History 158 December 13th 14 09:50 PM
Space Calendar - July 27, 2005 [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 July 27th 05 05:13 PM
Space Calendar - July 27, 2005 [email protected] History 0 July 27th 05 05:13 PM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 July 4th 05 07:50 AM
European high technology for the International Space Station Jacques van Oene Space Station 0 May 10th 04 02:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.