![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
SpaceX recently announced plans to develop the
"Falcon 9", with a first stage powered by nine Merlin engines each producing 85,000 lbs thrust at sea level for a grand total of 765,000 lbs of thrust. Merlin is the first hydrocarbon rocket engine to be so nearly-fully develop in the U.S. since the Saturn V F-1. If NASA agrees to abandon Delta II and its RS-27A engine in favor of EELV, Merlin will become the most powerful hydrocarbon engine in the U.S.. No matter what happens to SpaceX long term, Merlin is a commendable accomplishment. Still, I have to wonder if it might be easier to develop a rocket powered by four 200,000 lb thrust RS-27A engines than to create a nine- engine cluster of smaller engines. Since Boeing is disposing of Rocketdyne, RS-27A (which is already a proven cluster machine) should be available for commercialization beyond the Delta family. So why not use smaller numbers of a proven engine? - Ed Kyle |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Test Failure of SpaceX Merlin VTS1-221Engine | [email protected] | Policy | 57 | September 18th 05 11:14 PM |
SpaceX Falcon Aimed Toward California? | Ed Kyle | Policy | 18 | July 26th 05 06:16 AM |
SpaceX Thought experiment -a Saturn V class vehicle within 10 years? | Tom Cuddihy | Policy | 25 | June 19th 05 09:40 PM |
SpaceX Falcon I Hold-Down Firing Scheduled | Ed Kyle | Policy | 55 | May 31st 05 12:52 AM |
SpaceX for Real? | ed kyle | Policy | 42 | December 15th 03 11:41 PM |