A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Station
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NASA modifies Boeing ISS contract



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 8th 05, 10:59 PM
Jacques van Oene
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default NASA modifies Boeing ISS contract

Katherine Trinidad
Headquarters, Washington Sept. 8, 2005
(Phone: 202/358-3749)

James Hartsfield
Johnson Space Center, Houston
(Phone: 281/483-5111)

CONTRACT RELEASE: C05-t

NASA MODIFIES BOEING INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION CONTRACT

NASA signed a $68.35 million modification to the International Space
Station
contract with The Boeing Company. The modification provides a system to
supply
Station electrical power to docked Space Shuttles, enabling the Orbiter to
stay
longer at the complex.

The Station-Shuttle Power Transfer System (SSPTS) allows the Orbiter to use
electricity generated by the Station's solar arrays. The additional Station
power
supplements Shuttle fuel cells, saving onboard supplies of hydrogen and
oxygen.

The Station power will allow Shuttles to dock up to 12 days instead of up to
eight days. The longer stay allows additional time for spacewalks, Station
maintenance performed by Shuttle crews, Orbiter thermal protection system
inspection, contingency repairs, logistics transfers and science operations.

The change includes the design, development, manufacture, qualification,
testing,
delivery and instructions for installation of the SSPTS hardware, software
and
support equipment into the Station and Shuttle. The SSPTS will be installed
in
the first Shuttle in spring 2006. The first flight is targeted for Shuttle
mission STS-119, the mission to deliver the final component of the truss and
solar array structure that provides the Station's power.

The contract modification culminates with delivery of all SSPTS components,
integration and testing of the hardware and software in spring 2007. The
work
will be performed at Boeing facilities in Houston; Kennedy Space Center,
Fla.;
Canoga Park, Calif.; Huntington Beach, Calif.; and Seattle. For information
about
NASA and agency programs on the Web, visit:

http://www.nasa.gov/home

-end-


--
--------------

Jacques :-)

www.spacepatches.info


  #2  
Old September 9th 05, 02:44 AM
Ian Stirling
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jacques van Oene wrote:
snip quote
The modification provides a system to
supply
Station electrical power to docked Space Shuttles, enabling the Orbiter to
stay
longer at the complex.

The Station-Shuttle Power Transfer System (SSPTS) allows the Orbiter to use
electricity generated by the Station's solar arrays. The additional Station
power
supplements Shuttle fuel cells, saving onboard supplies of hydrogen and
oxygen.

The Station power will allow Shuttles to dock up to 12 days instead of up to
eight days. The longer stay allows additional time for spacewalks, Station


What's the new long pole in the tent, if it's not fuel cell supplies?
Boiloff rates for fuel cell fuels?
Can the fuel cells be turned completly off, or is this just something to
power the shuttle when the station is in light?
And what sort of power draw does the shuttle have (at minimum).
  #3  
Old September 9th 05, 04:10 AM
Reed Snellenberger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ian Stirling wrote in
:


What's the new long pole in the tent, if it's not fuel cell supplies?


You attach a scraper to that long pole to clean out the waste management
system. And that's not a tent -- it's the baggie you put the scrapings
into...


--
I was punching a text message into my | Reed Snellenberger
phone yesterday and thought, "they need | GPG KeyID: 5A978843
to make a phone that you can just talk | rsnellenberger
into." Major Thomb | -at-houston.rr.com

  #4  
Old September 9th 05, 09:03 AM
John Doe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ian Stirling wrote:
What's the new long pole in the tent, if it's not fuel cell supplies?
Boiloff rates for fuel cell fuels?
Can the fuel cells be turned completly off, or is this just something to
power the shuttle when the station is in light?



My guess is to allow the fuel cells to run in absolutely minimal mode
but still run. This way it greatly extends supplies of gases.

Extending missions won't allow NASA to reduce number of flights needed
to complete the station though.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
JimO writings on shuttle disaster, recovery Jim Oberg Space Shuttle 0 July 11th 05 06:32 PM
NASA Publications Online (V. long) Andrew Gray History 4 June 28th 04 10:24 PM
Selected Restricted NASA Videotapes Michael Ravnitzky Space Shuttle 5 January 16th 04 04:28 PM
NASA Modifies Space Flight Operations Contract Ron Baalke Space Shuttle 1 October 11th 03 10:26 AM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 September 12th 03 01:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.