A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Split ring mount



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 29th 05, 01:20 AM
Ernie Dunbar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Split ring mount

I've been looking at equatorial mounts for large aperature telescopes
- especially newtonians - and it seems to me that the most stable are
split-ring mounts. But noone really makes them, so I have to wonder
about their usefulness. Are they stable enough for astrophotography?
How easy are they to build? And where can I find plans for doing so?
  #2  
Old August 29th 05, 01:56 AM
Chris L Peterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 17:20:55 -0700, Ernie Dunbar
wrote:

I've been looking at equatorial mounts for large aperature telescopes
- especially newtonians - and it seems to me that the most stable are
split-ring mounts. But noone really makes them, so I have to wonder
about their usefulness. Are they stable enough for astrophotography?
How easy are they to build? And where can I find plans for doing so?


JMI makes scope/mount systems using split rings. The split ring mount is
extremely stable, and is arguably the best equatorial design for imaging
with a large scope. However, like other fork mounts, it is hard to make
for a wide range of scopes, so it isn't common as an aftermarket item.

IMO the split ring mount is one of the easier to build equatorials, but
nevertheless, any large, stable mount is a major construction project.
I've never seen plans; if I were going to make one I'd design it from
scratch.

_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
  #3  
Old August 29th 05, 08:02 AM
David Nakamoto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I thought JMI was still marketing one. Have they quit producing that line? I
wanted one for years but couldn't afford the one I wanted. I know it had some
problems with astrophotography early on, but they solved those problems.

--- Dave
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pinprick holes in a colorless sky
Let inspired figures of light pass by
The Mighty Light of ten thousand suns
Challenges infinity, and is soon gone




"Ernie Dunbar" wrote in message
...
I've been looking at equatorial mounts for large aperature telescopes
- especially newtonians - and it seems to me that the most stable are
split-ring mounts. But noone really makes them, so I have to wonder
about their usefulness. Are they stable enough for astrophotography?
How easy are they to build? And where can I find plans for doing so?



  #4  
Old August 29th 05, 03:54 PM
Jim Attfield
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 17:20:55 -0700, Ernie Dunbar
wrote:

I've been looking at equatorial mounts for large aperature telescopes
- especially newtonians - and it seems to me that the most stable are
split-ring mounts. But noone really makes them, so I have to wonder
about their usefulness. Are they stable enough for astrophotography?
How easy are they to build? And where can I find plans for doing so?


Ernie (and others),

I was interested in this too and was given this link (with plans and
other links) by a kind person at the skyquest-telescopes group so I
repay my debt of gratitude by passing it on - hope it is useful!
http://www.geocities.com/joe_pearson...ing_index.html

Jim

  #5  
Old August 29th 05, 10:52 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

A well built split ring mount is among the most stable kinds of mounts
possible, and might be the most stable mounts that trackt he stars with
a single movement around a single axis.

The only real issue with SRM is that they are not as compact as a DOB
mount. A 20" DOB can be put into a 26" Square foot print, the smallest
SRM I know of takes about 33" round footprint for the same mirror
diameter. There are a lot of vehicles that can absorb a 26" square
footprint that cannot absorb a 33" round footprint. This relagates many
users to simply use a DOB with a computer controller for tracking.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Keck Telescope Images of Uranus Reveal Ring, Atmospheric Fireworks Ron Misc 0 November 11th 04 06:12 PM
Keck Telescope Images of Uranus Reveal Ring, Atmospheric Fireworks Ron Astronomy Misc 0 November 11th 04 06:12 PM
RAT NOTES - TEC 200 F9 Triplet Apochromat - 09/01/04 Ratboy99 Amateur Astronomy 22 September 5th 04 05:38 PM
[Fwd: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 205)] Sam Wormley Amateur Astronomy 5 April 16th 04 10:20 PM
Small scope Saturn Pete Lawrence Amateur Astronomy 22 December 18th 03 10:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.