![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If money were no object, what would it take to build a moon base fit for
human habitation? Nasa is looking into just that, using the Hubble Space Telescope to hunt for suitable locations. And what if they build on one of the millions of plots already "sold" by entrepreneurs? Much more from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4177064.stm |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nick wrote:
If money were no object, what would it take to build a moon base fit for human habitation? Nasa is looking into just that, using the Hubble Space Telescope to hunt for suitable locations. And what if they build on one of the millions of plots already "sold" by entrepreneurs? Much more from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4177064.stm For starters the Hubble Space Telescope can't image the Moon - its too bright! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wasn't it John Ruddy who wrote:
For starters the Hubble Space Telescope can't image the Moon - its too bright! Whatever makes you think that? http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/newsdesk/archive/releases/1999/14/ -- Mike Williams Gentleman of Leisure |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
- And on Sat, 27 Aug 2005 06:47:07 +0100, it was spake thus said in message John Ruddy :
Nick wrote: If money were no object, what would it take to build a moon base fit for human habitation? Nasa is looking into just that, using the Hubble Space Telescope to hunt for suitable locations. And what if they build on one of the millions of plots already "sold" by entrepreneurs? Much more from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4177064.stm For starters the Hubble Space Telescope can't image the Moon - its too bright! Sorry John, see the thread from earlier this week http://groups.google.com/group/uk.sc...ae1ba68d ebbd |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wrong.
Hubble can't image the sun, and that's because the optics will overheat and be distorted. Regards Colin Dawson. www.cjdawson.com "John Ruddy" wrote in message ... Nick wrote: If money were no object, what would it take to build a moon base fit for human habitation? Nasa is looking into just that, using the Hubble Space Telescope to hunt for suitable locations. And what if they build on one of the millions of plots already "sold" by entrepreneurs? Much more from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4177064.stm For starters the Hubble Space Telescope can't image the Moon - its too bright! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 09:27:21 GMT, "Colin Dawson"
wrote: Wrong. Hubble can't image the sun, and that's because the optics will overheat and be distorted. So they'd lead you believe. The real reason is that there's no one up there to fit the Baader filter. -- Pete http://www.digitalsky.org.uk Recent images http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/recent/recent_images.html ** Last update June 24 2005 ** |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll go. :-)
"Pete Lawrence" wrote in message ... On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 09:27:21 GMT, "Colin Dawson" wrote: Wrong. Hubble can't image the sun, and that's because the optics will overheat and be distorted. So they'd lead you believe. The real reason is that there's no one up there to fit the Baader filter. -- Pete http://www.digitalsky.org.uk Recent images http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/recent/recent_images.html ** Last update June 24 2005 ** |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | Astronomy Misc | 15 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |
The apollo faq | the inquirer | Misc | 4 | April 15th 04 04:45 AM |
significant addition to section 25 of the faq | heat | Misc | 1 | April 15th 04 01:20 AM |
The Apollo FAQ (moon landings were faked) | Nathan Jones | UK Astronomy | 8 | February 4th 04 06:48 PM |
NEWS: The allure of an outpost on the Moon | Kent Betts | Space Shuttle | 2 | January 15th 04 12:56 AM |