A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Shuttle
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

International Space Agency



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 26th 05, 07:12 PM
Victoria
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default International Space Agency

Dear sci.space.shuttle

This post is to set the record straight, and to correct the great deal
of incorrect and extremely old & outdated information which is
displayed on this sci.space.policy news group when the search term
"International Space Agency" is entered into the google search box, for
google news groups. Much of these posts which are displayed when
"International Space Agency" is entered in Google Search, is as old as
1990??!!, and also posts which have absolutely nothing what so ever to
do with "International Space Agency". This incorrect and outdated
information is being routinely displayed in the top listings in both
the "Sorted by relevance" and "Sort by date" when the term
"International Space Agency" is entered into Google Search Box.

As this is now doing great damage to the International Space Agency
(ISA) Organization, Trademarked & Copyrighted (1986-2005) Name & Public
Identity, and is causing great confusion to the general public who are
searching for the "International Space Agency" on google, and then
getting this incorrect, outdated, and at times, plagiarized information
and materials.

Also, this false, outdated, and incorrect information is being used by
propaganda professionals, antagonists, and anarchists, who have been
routinely and systematically using this information to deceive the
unsuspecting public, and to slander the good name of the International
Space Agency (ISA) Organization.

Please see this updated and correct information about the International
Space Agency (ISA) Organization, Thanks.

This is the present International Space Agency (ISA) Organization,
Google News Group:
http://groups.google.com/group/Inter...ace-Agency-ISA
http://www.international-space-agenc...ncies_400w.jpg

This is the official International Space Agency (ISA) Organization, Web
Gate:
http://www.international-space-agency.org
http://www.international-space-agenc...ncies_400w.jpg

Ad-Astra! "To The Stars!"
In Peace For All Humanity! So Say We All!

Sincerely, Best Regards,
Mrs. Victoria Scott, Ph.D.
Public Affairs Officer
International Space Agency, I.S.A.
International Space Administration
http://www.international-space-agency.org
http://www.international-space-agenc...ncies_400w.jpg
http://www.international-space-agenc..._250w_250h.jpg


International Space Agency, I.S.A.
Diplomatic Offices - Washington, D.C.
Website: http://www.isa-hq.org
Phone: (202) 917-0209

International Space Agency, I.S.A.
Administrative Offices - Omaha, Nebraska
Website: http://www.isa-hq.net
Phone: (402) 299-2799

  #2  
Old August 26th 05, 07:46 PM
Derek Lyons
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Victoria" wrote:

Dear sci.space.shuttle


Dear Victoria - there is little confusion as almost nobody but you
writes about your 'agency'. (I place 'agency' in scare quotes with
deliberation - you misrepresent yourself as something you are not.)

D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL
  #3  
Old August 26th 05, 08:27 PM
John Doe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Derek Lyons wrote:

"Victoria" wrote:


Dear Victoria - there is little confusion as almost nobody but you
writes about your 'agency'.


And we know that the real name of the international space agency will be
Starfleet. It will eventually become part of a greater organisation
called the Federation. And this won't happen for at least another 150 years.

And you'll notice that they killed the Star Trek franchise just when
they were about to document how the Federation gets formed. The current
government clearly has no intentions of being part of some international
agency where it doesn't have 100% control and they probably arranged for
the Star Trek franchise to be killed to prevent that from happening.

One producer tried to rescue Enterprise, and being Cuban born, he
probably resisted the "suggestions" to cannabalise the franchise and
tried his best to counter the damage done by the previous producer who
was intent on killing it to please the current government.


And yes, I see black shuttlecraft hovering above me. There are here even
before I post this. :-) :-) :-) :-)
And tin foil hats don't protect against phasers and transporters.
  #4  
Old August 27th 05, 07:58 PM
Brian Gaff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Chuckle.... What harm could it do to put her point in a faq though..

PS never even heard of the organisation myself, so maybe organisation is the
wrong term?

Brian

--
Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email:
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________


"John Doe" wrote in message ...
Derek Lyons wrote:

"Victoria" wrote:


Dear Victoria - there is little confusion as almost nobody but you
writes about your 'agency'.


And we know that the real name of the international space agency will be
Starfleet. It will eventually become part of a greater organisation
called the Federation. And this won't happen for at least another 150
years.

And you'll notice that they killed the Star Trek franchise just when
they were about to document how the Federation gets formed. The current
government clearly has no intentions of being part of some international
agency where it doesn't have 100% control and they probably arranged for
the Star Trek franchise to be killed to prevent that from happening.

One producer tried to rescue Enterprise, and being Cuban born, he
probably resisted the "suggestions" to cannabalise the franchise and
tried his best to counter the damage done by the previous producer who
was intent on killing it to please the current government.


And yes, I see black shuttlecraft hovering above me. There are here even
before I post this. :-) :-) :-) :-)
And tin foil hats don't protect against phasers and transporters.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
International Space Agency Victoria History 34 August 30th 05 07:06 PM
Space Calendar - July 27, 2005 [email protected] History 0 July 27th 05 05:13 PM
JimO writings on shuttle disaster, recovery Jim Oberg Policy 0 July 11th 05 06:32 PM
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) Stuf4 Policy 145 July 28th 04 07:30 AM
European high technology for the International Space Station Jacques van Oene Space Station 0 May 10th 04 02:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.