![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How far away is it? Barnard's star or further?
cheres!!! S-S |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Starlight-Starbright wrote:
How far away is it? Barnard's star or further? cheres!!! S- http://www.hobrad.com/astnotes.htm "...(the nearest of the sunlike stars with planets, Epsilon Eridani, is 10.5 light-years from Earth), observation has been almost entirely indirect, based on radial velocity (the gravitational wobble or motion of the parent stars)." Gliese 876 at 15 ly appears to be the second closest. Also see, http://planetquest1.jpl.nasa.gov/atlas/atlas_search.cfm |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hello, in the case of Epsilon Eridani there are a few reports loosely referred to as UFO reports where the "Aliens" indicated that they originated from there. I think it was the Betty and Barney case in America. The psychiatrists and Christian leaders discredited the case as they usually do. However of a planetary system around this star just put some credence on the UFO report. I read that there is a planetary system of at least three planets orbiting Barnards star. However the measurements of the wobble were over a hundred years and Christian Scientists have used this as an excuse to point to optical defects in the telescope as the cause. Other obervations by modern instruments have confirmed the wobble but the integrating time has not been sufficient to sort out the number of planets. Only one Jupiter sized planet is suspected so far. The original measurements indicated that the other planets were lighter and in smaller orbits. Life on other planets means that "I am not immortal" so watch out for the Christian thought police. Chris. "Klaatu" wrote in message m... Starlight-Starbright wrote: How far away is it? Barnard's star or further? cheres!!! S- http://www.hobrad.com/astnotes.htm "...(the nearest of the sunlike stars with planets, Epsilon Eridani, is 10.5 light-years from Earth), observation has been almost entirely indirect, based on radial velocity (the gravitational wobble or motion of the parent stars)." Gliese 876 at 15 ly appears to be the second closest. Also see, http://planetquest1.jpl.nasa.gov/atlas/atlas_search.cfm |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris wrote:
Hello, in the case of Epsilon Eridani there are a few reports loosely referred to as UFO reports where the "Aliens" indicated that they originated from there. I think it was the Betty and Barney case in America. The psychiatrists and Christian leaders discredited the case as they usually do. However of a planetary system around this star just put some credence on the UFO report. I read that there is a planetary system of at least three planets orbiting Barnards star. However the measurements of the wobble were over a hundred years and Christian Scientists have used this as an excuse to point to optical defects in the telescope as the cause. Other obervations by modern instruments have confirmed the wobble but the integrating time has not been sufficient to sort out the number of planets. Only one Jupiter sized planet is suspected so far. The original measurements indicated that the other planets were lighter and in smaller orbits. Life on other planets means that "I am not immortal" so watch out for the Christian thought police. Chris. With the clever use of your favourite browser and the first result returned by Google, you would have found the following : http://www.solstation.com/stars/eps-erid.htm "The Star [Epsilon Eridani] This main sequence, orange-red dwarf (K2 V) is a relative young star that may be only 500 million to a billion years old. It may have about 85 percent of Sol's mass (RECONS), 84 percent of its diameter (Johnson and Wright, 1983, page 653), but only about 27.8 percent of its luminosity (Saumon et al, 1996, page 17). The European Space Agency has used ultraviolet spectral flux distribution data to determine stellar effective temperatures and surface gravities, including those of Epsilon Eridani." The star's young age of "only 500 million to a billion years" makes it an unlikely source of space-faring aliens! You need a bit more time for aliens to develop! If you are very lucky, there might be some primitive organisms growing on the soil or near undersea vents right now. Give them a few billion years more to develop into a radio-civilization and another few thousand and then, just maybe, if they haven't destroyed themselves or their planet, they might be visiting other planets! Good luck. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arnold wrote:
With the clever use of your favourite browser and the first result returned by Google, you would have found the following : http://www.solstation.com/stars/eps-erid.htm "The Star [Epsilon Eridani] This main sequence, orange-red dwarf (K2 V) is a relative young star that may be only 500 million to a billion years old. It may have about 85 percent of Sol's mass (RECONS), 84 percent of its diameter (Johnson and Wright, 1983, page 653), but only about 27.8 percent of its luminosity (Saumon et al, 1996, page 17). The European Space Agency has used ultraviolet spectral flux distribution data to determine stellar effective temperatures and surface gravities, including those of Epsilon Eridani." The star's young age of "only 500 million to a billion years" makes it an unlikely source of space-faring aliens! You need a bit more time for aliens to develop! If you are very lucky, there might be some primitive organisms growing on the soil or near undersea vents right now. Give them a few billion years more to develop into a radio-civilization and another few thousand and then, just maybe, if they haven't destroyed themselves or their planet, they might be visiting other planets! Good luck. I forgot to add that the same reasoning applies to claims of aliens coming from the Pleiades or other young stars or clusters. Another popular star for alien origins is Vega - remember Carl Sagan's 'Contact'? http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/~kaler/sow/vega.html "Several other stars similar to Vega (Fomalhaut, Denebola, Merak, for example) possess similar disks, and astronomers speculate that they may indicate the existence of planetary systems, though no planets have ever been detected. Even if they exist, it seems unlikely that life would have developed to any degree because of the short lifetimes of these hot stars." -- 25° 45' S 28° 12' E GMT+2 Join the Planetary Society http://www.planetary.org |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for that. Obvously it was the wrong star.
Chris. "Arnold" wrote in message ... Chris wrote: Hello, in the case of Epsilon Eridani there are a few reports loosely referred to as UFO reports where the "Aliens" indicated that they originated from there. I think it was the Betty and Barney case in America. The psychiatrists and Christian leaders discredited the case as they usually do. However of a planetary system around this star just put some credence on the UFO report. I read that there is a planetary system of at least three planets orbiting Barnards star. However the measurements of the wobble were over a hundred years and Christian Scientists have used this as an excuse to point to optical defects in the telescope as the cause. Other obervations by modern instruments have confirmed the wobble but the integrating time has not been sufficient to sort out the number of planets. Only one Jupiter sized planet is suspected so far. The original measurements indicated that the other planets were lighter and in smaller orbits. Life on other planets means that "I am not immortal" so watch out for the Christian thought police. Chris. With the clever use of your favourite browser and the first result returned by Google, you would have found the following : http://www.solstation.com/stars/eps-erid.htm "The Star [Epsilon Eridani] This main sequence, orange-red dwarf (K2 V) is a relative young star that may be only 500 million to a billion years old. It may have about 85 percent of Sol's mass (RECONS), 84 percent of its diameter (Johnson and Wright, 1983, page 653), but only about 27.8 percent of its luminosity (Saumon et al, 1996, page 17). The European Space Agency has used ultraviolet spectral flux distribution data to determine stellar effective temperatures and surface gravities, including those of Epsilon Eridani." The star's young age of "only 500 million to a billion years" makes it an unlikely source of space-faring aliens! You need a bit more time for aliens to develop! If you are very lucky, there might be some primitive organisms growing on the soil or near undersea vents right now. Give them a few billion years more to develop into a radio-civilization and another few thousand and then, just maybe, if they haven't destroyed themselves or their planet, they might be visiting other planets! Good luck. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well there must be lots more stars to choose from. Do you know any
canditates stars about 4.5 Billion years old, main sequence like the sun that are near enough to be of any interest as possible origin stars of these alien reports. I doubt if the usual contactees have any atrononominal knowledge. The last contactee I heard of is now incarcerated in a mental hospital with a possible hole in her head and is learning new skill as on office clerk. Chris. "Arnold" wrote in message ... Arnold wrote: With the clever use of your favourite browser and the first result returned by Google, you would have found the following : http://www.solstation.com/stars/eps-erid.htm "The Star [Epsilon Eridani] This main sequence, orange-red dwarf (K2 V) is a relative young star that may be only 500 million to a billion years old. It may have about 85 percent of Sol's mass (RECONS), 84 percent of its diameter (Johnson and Wright, 1983, page 653), but only about 27.8 percent of its luminosity (Saumon et al, 1996, page 17). The European Space Agency has used ultraviolet spectral flux distribution data to determine stellar effective temperatures and surface gravities, including those of Epsilon Eridani." The star's young age of "only 500 million to a billion years" makes it an unlikely source of space-faring aliens! You need a bit more time for aliens to develop! If you are very lucky, there might be some primitive organisms growing on the soil or near undersea vents right now. Give them a few billion years more to develop into a radio-civilization and another few thousand and then, just maybe, if they haven't destroyed themselves or their planet, they might be visiting other planets! Good luck. I forgot to add that the same reasoning applies to claims of aliens coming from the Pleiades or other young stars or clusters. Another popular star for alien origins is Vega - remember Carl Sagan's 'Contact'? http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/~kaler/sow/vega.html "Several other stars similar to Vega (Fomalhaut, Denebola, Merak, for example) possess similar disks, and astronomers speculate that they may indicate the existence of planetary systems, though no planets have ever been detected. Even if they exist, it seems unlikely that life would have developed to any degree because of the short lifetimes of these hot stars." -- 25° 45' S 28° 12' E GMT+2 Join the Planetary Society http://www.planetary.org |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"S" == Starlight-Starbright writes:
S How far away is it? Barnard's star or further? I think it would be the planets orbiting epsilon Eridani, which is about 3.2 pc distant (~ 10 light years). -- Lt. Lazio, HTML police | e-mail: No means no, stop rape. | http://patriot.net/%7Ejlazio/ sci.astro FAQ at http://sciastro.astronomy.net/sci.astro.html |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Starlight-Starbright;
http://www.hobrad.com/astnotes=AD.htm "...(the nearest of the sunlike stars with planets, Epsilon Eridani, is 1= 0=2E5 light-years from Earth), observation has been almost entirely indirect, based on radial velocity (the gravitational wobble or motion of the parent stars)." Gliese 876 at 15 ly appears to be the second closest. Also see, http://planetquest1.jpl.nasa.g=ADov/...las_search.cfm Obviously this 10.5 LY exoplanet factor imposes a slight butt-sucking packet handshake drawback of 21 and some odd years at best. I wonder what the average to/from Venus packet is worth. Actually I believe that's going to be somewhat of a nearly free local ET area code call, especially when at times (roughly every 19 months) Venus is merely 105~110 times as far off as our moon. At least upon Venus there's been no shortage of green energy for whatever locals and/or ET's that managed to build their complex community, established multiple reservoirs, a rather massive/substantial and long bridge, a fairly nifty tarmac and I do firmly believe a few rigid airships to boot (if your planet had been getting itself geothermally hotter by as much as 1=B0K per year, wouldn't you?). (actually 0.1=B0K shift/year from a tropical 300=B0K to 725=B0K is more than likely unless that geothermal energy was something stirred up by way of a fairly massive and unfortunate encounter with the likes of Jupiter) Because of the easily available spare and squeaky clean energy (of mostly dry CO2 and S8 offering the near surface differentials of 4+bar/km and 10=B0K/km), and the rather toasty matter of fact that it's everywhere and entirely green/renewable energy at that, clearly represents that almost nothing about Venus is all that insurmountable for the average exoskeletal nocturnal sorts of their locals, although visiting ETs with sufficient applied technology could certainly be quite human like, especially doable compared to the rather pathetic sub-frozen, continually TBI and easily pulverised likes of Mars. ~ This is about a basic Township, Bridge & Tarmac upon Venus: http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm China/Russian LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator) http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm A few alternative topics from wizard Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris,
If you're out and about looking for the best ever and most local UFO park-n-ride, look no further than the tarmac that's situated upon Venus, or are you as intellectually blind as well as dumb and dumber and thus easily dumbfounded and snookered to boot? What exactly is it about Venus that you do not understand? BTW; Venus isn't quite as old as Earth (could be at least a billion years newer), at least not for it's being within the orbit and as geologically active (atmospheric building phase) as it is. ~ This is about a basic Township, Bridge & Tarmac upon Venus: http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm China/Russian LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator) http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm A few alternative topics from wizard Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nearest exoplanet | Starlight-Starbright | Astronomy Misc | 47 | July 6th 05 05:10 PM |
Is This Speck of Light an Exoplanet? (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 10th 04 03:44 PM |
Astronomers Discover the Nearest Young Planet-Forming Star | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 27th 04 12:19 AM |
ESO begins era or incredible exoplanet discoveries. | Jason H. | SETI | 0 | February 22nd 04 06:07 AM |
Astronomers find nearest galaxy to the Milky Way (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 7th 03 02:30 PM |