![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Synta is now the proud owner of Celestron.
They probably bought in because the patents and technology to make SCT correctors is essential to reproduce that business in MAINLAND CHINA! So the next time a tank rolls over some democracy protester in Tianamen Square, picture a C8 mounted on the front of it! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RichA" wrote in message ... Synta is now the proud owner of Celestron. They probably bought in because the patents and technology to make SCT correctors is essential to reproduce that business in MAINLAND CHINA! So the next time a tank rolls over some democracy protester in Tianamen Square, picture a C8 mounted on the front of it! Start by getting your data right. Synta is a _Taiwanese_ company, not a Chinese company. They do have a manufacturing plant in China, and are already the largest manufacturer of OEM optics in the world. They helped design some of the newer Celestron scopes over the last few years, and so there is little 'new' that they are going to find out. In fact the 'owners', are a seperate company in the US, that is itself owned by Synta (SW Technology Corporation). Best Wishes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rich, there is no point in preaching to the American consumer. They
only care about price ... not quality, not pollution, not worker rights, not human rights or the fact that giving away the industrial base will eventually bite them in the ass. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Our American culture, IMHO is too Euro-centric. Most Americans cannot
differentiate between any Asian counry or culture. This is a good example. Do not get me wrong, I am as anti-communist as any sensible person. But do not confuse Taiwan with the PRC. Taiwan is not a communist country. Reminds me of when I came back from a trip to Japan and my coworkers asked me if I saw the Great Wall...sheesh. Matthew Ota California Buddahead |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:26:27 -0400, RichA wrote:
Synta is now the proud owner of Celestron. They probably bought in because the patents and technology to make SCT correctors is essential to reproduce that business in MAINLAND CHINA! So the next time a tank rolls over some democracy protester in Tianamen Square, picture a C8 mounted on the front of it! sniffsniff . . . sniff . . . Hmmm. Smells like Troll Bait! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matthew Ota" wrote in message oups.com... Our American culture, IMHO is too Euro-centric. Most Americans cannot differentiate between any Asian counry or culture. This is a good example. Do not get me wrong, I am as anti-communist as any sensible person. But do not confuse Taiwan with the PRC. Taiwan is not a communist country. *Reminds me of when I came back from a trip to Japan and my coworkers asked me if I saw the Great Wall...sheesh.* Matthew Ota California Buddahead *Umm..there really isn't any excuse for that. Like you said...sheesh. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I ever had the way to vist Japan, I'd like to see the Neko temple and
bring back a JBT or two. "Matthew Ota" wrote in message oups.com... Our American culture, IMHO is too Euro-centric. Most Americans cannot differentiate between any Asian counry or culture. This is a good example. Do not get me wrong, I am as anti-communist as any sensible person. But do not confuse Taiwan with the PRC. Taiwan is not a communist country. Reminds me of when I came back from a trip to Japan and my coworkers asked me if I saw the Great Wall...sheesh. Matthew Ota California Buddahead |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 14:54:25 GMT, "Roger Hamlett"
wrote, in part: "RichA" wrote in message .. . Synta is now the proud owner of Celestron. They probably bought in because the patents and technology to make SCT correctors is essential to reproduce that business in MAINLAND CHINA! So the next time a tank rolls over some democracy protester in Tianamen Square, picture a C8 mounted on the front of it! Start by getting your data right. Synta is a _Taiwanese_ company, not a Chinese company. They do have a manufacturing plant in China, and are already the largest manufacturer of OEM optics in the world. But since Synta has a manufacturing plant in _Mainland_ China - I believe that must be what you meant, since Taiwan _is_ part of China, although not being part of the People's Republic of China, and thus any Synta manufacturing plant in Taiwan would be in China (just as a manufacturing plant in Munich and a manufacturing plant in Dresden would both have been in Germany even *before* the Berlin Wall came down) - then the technology for making Schmidt-Cassegrain telescopes *could* sneak into Red China because of this. Of course, SCTs have been around for enough years that the patents have expired. Schmidt *himself* successfully kept his secret of how to make correctors, but it has since become general knowledge: http://www.quadibloc.com/science/opt02.htm Also, cheap Maksutov telescopes are already being made in China. It's true that cheap SCTs would be even cheaper - given that *labor* may be cheap in China, but optical glass also uses raw materials... sand may be pretty cheap, but *Barium* costs real money - but is the difference really a big deal, particularly as Maksutovs are percieved as being better quality? John Savard John Savard http://www.quadibloc.com/index.html _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 120,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All this time I thought the "C" stood for Quality.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Savard wrote:
But since Synta has a manufacturing plant in _Mainland_ China - I believe that must be what you meant, since Taiwan _is_ part of China, That's a pretty misleading way to put it. Taiwan in no way considers itself to be part of anything larger--at least, not at the present moment. It would only consider the proposition of becoming part of a larger China if the mainland ceases what Taiwan considers to be unreasonable aggression. The mainland, of course, does consider Taiwan to be part of it. But it's not quite the plain factual matter your words suggest. Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Celestron vs Celestron Pacific | Mean Mr Mustard | Amateur Astronomy | 31 | April 23rd 05 10:09 AM |
Orange Country Register: Celestron Down, Meade Sinking | RMOLLISE | Amateur Astronomy | 38 | April 6th 05 04:24 AM |
Brief Review of Celestron ED80 | Jason Martin | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | October 25th 04 11:54 PM |
Celestron settles with Meade | Edward | Amateur Astronomy | 24 | July 14th 04 08:48 PM |
Has anyone done a comparison of the Photon Instruments 127mm refractor with the Celestron and Meade 6" refractors? | Bob Midiri | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 6th 03 06:13 PM |