Echelon monitoring report

On Thu, 12 May 2005 07:38:28 -0600, Art Deco wrote:

Don't panic!

Good advice.

http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/alexa/socks.html
http://www.petitmorte.net/cujo/kazoo/kazoo.html




http://www.insurgent.org & http://www.petitmorte.net & http://databasix.com
front operations for US Carlyle-Coutts Organized Crime Government
PNAC Bible Thumpers * Child Molesters * Child Snuff Film Makers *
Drug Runners * Prostitution * Blackmail * Murder *

full story he
http://johnnygosch.com/
http://www.rense.com/Datapages/ganndat.htm

- - - - - -=::Oo:::=- - - - - -

Carlyle & The CIA really do illegally employ psychologists to psyop, stalk and harass
newsgroups and they really do use psychotronic weaponry & remote neural monitoring on newsgroup participants
to mood alter and influence them for mind control.

Jim Glass aka 'Andrea Chen' Dr. Christopher "Kit" Green, Dr. Leslie Packer, David Green (paid by bin Laden to post to Usenet)
Dean Humphries, Kevin Cannon, and Kimberly Barnard
http://www.insurgent.org and http://www.petitmorte.net

- - - - - -=::Oo:::=- - - - - -

-Agent BlueBird(tm)
Brother Blue, B:.B:.,33°,8=3
Dr. Blue Resonant Human, Ph.D.
Interdimensional Intelligence Analyst
Sacerdotal Knights of National Security
USENET Meme Acquisition and Propagation Directorate
"An Equal Opportunity Mystickal Fraternity and Stuff"
http://web.archive.org/web/199804242...otherblue.org/

- - - - - -=::Oo:::=- - - - - -

paid by bin Laden & Carlyle to post to usenet:




Datel Systems Incorporated (NET-DATEL-NET)
4444 Convoy Street #300
San Diego, CA 92111

Netname: DATEL-NET
Netnumber: 199.201.129.0

Coordinator:
Davis, Morgan (MD92)
619-637-3637

Domain System inverse mapping provided by:

NS.DATEL.COM 199.201.129.97
NS.CTS.COM 192.188.72.18
NCTAMSEP.NAVY.MIL 138.183.254.2

Record last updated on 18-May-94.

Database last updated on 16-Jan-98 04:10:59 EDT.

- - - - - -=::Oo:::=- - - - - -
* * "The Earth is the cradle of the Mind,
*
* Jim Glass * But you cannnot stay in the cradle
forever." *
* Member of Technical Staff * - Konstantin E. Tsiolkovsky
*
* Systems Architecture
*********************************************** **
* Rocketdyne Division * *
* Rockwell International * The opinions expressed here *
* Mail Stop IB-59 * are my own and do not reflect *
* 6633 Canoga Avenue * those of my employer! *
* P.O. Box 7922 * *
* Canoga Park, CA 91309-7922 * (But then, you knew that!) *
* (818) 586-0375 * *

On Fri, 13 May 2005 00:25:03 +0100, Ray Vingnutte
wrote:

On 12 May 2005 18:10:05 -0500
Dan wrote:

In article ,
Ray Vingnutte wrote:

Um, sorry, but a website is not convincing evidence. It looks
like tinfoil hat stuff to me. Looking at the list of newsgroups
this post is going to, I can see that's all it is.

You could always put words like, hijack, president, nuclear, etc etc
in a mock email to a friend or someone making it sound like a real
and genuine threat and see if anything happens to you ;-)

I have. Nothing happens.

This story first appeared in the 80's, only then it was "they
monitored all phone conversations" for such words. We used to say
things like assassinate, President, conspiracy, explosives, etc. etc.
on the phone all the time.

Nothing ever happened.

How do you know nothing happened, all you can possibly think you know is
that no one took any interest perhaps, decided you weren't worth a visit
or follow up ;-)

Echelon manages to spy on anyone they chose, perchance why was it that
'national security' at the NSA/Echelon did noting about 911.

Would it have something to do with Dick Cheney's wife being on the board of
directors of Lockheed, or that The British Throne owns Lockheed?

That was in the 80's and not in the paranoid early 00's. I can believe
they may do it for big bucks business or government contracts as in a
way that would make sense to do it. Collecting masses of information on
the whole populace is another matter.


Dan

On Thu, 12 May 2005 23:30:18 GMT
"hi ho, hi ho" wrote:

On Fri, 13 May 2005 00:25:03 +0100, Ray Vingnutte
wrote:

On 12 May 2005 18:10:05 -0500
Dan wrote:

In article ,
Ray Vingnutte wrote:

Um, sorry, but a website is not convincing evidence. It
looks like tinfoil hat stuff to me. Looking at the list of
newsgroups this post is going to, I can see that's all it is.

You could always put words like, hijack, president, nuclear, etc
etc in a mock email to a friend or someone making it sound like a
real and genuine threat and see if anything happens to you ;-)

I have. Nothing happens.

This story first appeared in the 80's, only then it was "they
monitored all phone conversations" for such words. We used to say
things like assassinate, President, conspiracy, explosives, etc.
etc. on the phone all the time.

Nothing ever happened.

How do you know nothing happened, all you can possibly think you know
is that no one took any interest perhaps, decided you weren't worth a
visit or follow up ;-)

Echelon manages to spy on anyone they chose, perchance why was it that
'national security' at the NSA/Echelon did noting about 911.

I may be wrong but did I not see someone(don't ask me who I can't
remember) but someone high up say yes mistakes were made, but then with
hindsight that can apply to almost anything.

And if they really do store and save as much as they can then most of
that info will only likely be of use in a retrospective way anyway.


Would it have something to do with Dick Cheney's wife being on the
board of directors of Lockheed, or that The British Throne owns
Lockheed?

Couldn't possibly comment ;-) I have no idea what you're on about there.


That was in the 80's and not in the paranoid early 00's. I can
believe they may do it for big bucks business or government contracts
as in a way that would make sense to do it. Collecting masses of
information on the whole populace is another matter.


Dan

On Fri, 13 May 2005 01:30:47 +0100, Ray Vingnutte
wrote:

On Thu, 12 May 2005 23:30:18 GMT
"hi ho, hi ho" wrote:

On Fri, 13 May 2005 00:25:03 +0100, Ray Vingnutte
wrote:

On 12 May 2005 18:10:05 -0500
Dan wrote:

In article ,
Ray Vingnutte wrote:

Um, sorry, but a website is not convincing evidence. It
looks like tinfoil hat stuff to me. Looking at the list of
newsgroups this post is going to, I can see that's all it is.

You could always put words like, hijack, president, nuclear, etc
etc in a mock email to a friend or someone making it sound like a
real and genuine threat and see if anything happens to you ;-)

I have. Nothing happens.

This story first appeared in the 80's, only then it was "they
monitored all phone conversations" for such words. We used to say
things like assassinate, President, conspiracy, explosives, etc.
etc. on the phone all the time.

Nothing ever happened.

How do you know nothing happened, all you can possibly think you know
is that no one took any interest perhaps, decided you weren't worth a
visit or follow up ;-)

Echelon manages to spy on anyone they chose, perchance why was it that
'national security' at the NSA/Echelon did noting about 911.

I may be wrong but did I not see someone(don't ask me who I can't
remember) but someone high up say yes mistakes were made, but then with
hindsight that can apply to almost anything.

How precisely is Dick Cheney, The Secret Service and the CIA attacking the
USA a mistake?

And if they really do store and save as much as they can then most of
that info will only likely be of use in a retrospective way anyway.


Would it have something to do with Dick Cheney's wife being on the
board of directors of Lockheed, or that The British Throne owns
Lockheed?

Couldn't possibly comment ;-) I have no idea what you're on about there.

Everyone in the world knows, except those living under a rock.

Of course Dick and the CIA require a lot of lap dog traitors to keep
covering up for them.


That was in the 80's and not in the paranoid early 00's. I can
believe they may do it for big bucks business or government contracts
as in a way that would make sense to do it. Collecting masses of
information on the whole populace is another matter.


Dan

"Music will always brighten the day,
An oboe, the most beautiful
Instrument."
~ William Byrd

"Oboes sing themselves
Serene ...

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:29:18 -0600, Art Deco wrote:

Echelon is owned by the Rothschilds.

Exposing the Global Surveillance System - http://mediafilter.org/echelon/

Exposing the Global Surveillance System - http://www.ncoic.com/echelon1.htm

Exposing the Global Surveillance System -
http://www.hamradio-online.com/1996/dec/echelon.html