![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() nightbat wrote: nightbat wrote " wrote: http://education.guardian.co.uk/high...458852,00.html nightbat Humble nightbat already scientifically answered there could not be any point originating everywhere Big Bang due to mathematical proof that energy cannot be created nor destroyed. Sorry, therefore no original Big Bang nor no Big Crunch per posted reference folks, next case. And for gravity waves see oc. the nightbat Well nightbat, there need not have been a point singularity prior to the Big Bang. It may rather have been a quark soup of the gravastar variety. If energy has been compressed from a previous universe, then no energy needs to be created in rebounding bang. The idea of the structure of galaxies coming from early quantum fluctuations is not a new idea. Trying to detect these fluctuations in the form of gravity waves is. But first we have to figure out how to detect gravity waves. Were the quantum fluctuations truly random, or were they a way for information to seep through from that earlier universe? Could earlier information have come through the Big Bang similar to how Hawking envisions information coming back out of a "black hole"? Double-A |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What are Quasars made of? | Paul Hollister | Astronomy Misc | 17 | March 9th 05 04:42 AM |
The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | September 9th 04 06:30 AM |
The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory | Br Dan Izzo | Astronomy Misc | 8 | September 7th 04 12:07 AM |
Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult? | Yoda | Misc | 102 | August 2nd 04 02:33 AM |
A dialogue between Mr. Big BANG and Mr. Steady STATE | Marcel Luttgens | Astronomy Misc | 12 | August 6th 03 06:15 AM |