The mind of Einstein

Here is some dinner time reading to contemplate.

http://lorentz.phl.jhu.edu/AnnusMira...es/eins_lq.pdf

http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/

http://lorentz.phl.jhu.edu/AnnusMira.../eins_diss.pdf

http://lorentz.phl.jhu.edu/AnnusMira...s_brownian.pdf

http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

enjoy!

"Mike" wrote in message news:RtX9e.43455$yV3.22742@clgrps12...
Here is some dinner time reading to contemplate.

http://lorentz.phl.jhu.edu/AnnusMira...es/eins_lq.pdf

http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/

http://lorentz.phl.jhu.edu/AnnusMira.../eins_diss.pdf

http://lorentz.phl.jhu.edu/AnnusMira...s_brownian.pdf

http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

enjoy!

Enjoy indeed !,I think it is absolutely hilarious but for those who
have yet to enjoy the technical ins and outs of the most freakish
concept ever to appear on the planet,there is always the dumbed down
version of a great work of fiction that supersedes the Da Vinci Code
for value.

http://www.bartleby.com/173/


To really enjoy the hocus pocus,take a step back to Newton.The
pre-Copernican average 24 hour day derived from the Equation of time
correction translates into constant rotation at 15 degrees per hour
and 24 hours for a full rotation within a Copernican/Keplerian
heliocentric framework.

Newton after correctly identifying the Equation of Time,forgets that
the average 24 hour day translates into constant axial rotation
corresponding to 24 hours/360 degrees and adopts Flamsteed's false
'proof' for constant axial rotation at 23 hours 56 min 04 sec.

http://hypertextbook.com/facts/1999/JennyChen.shtml

What a big mistake with really big consequences!!.



As for Albert,well he is a complete astronomical cretin ,given that he
not only ties rotation to the 'fixed star' but he attributes the value
as the 24 hour astronomical day it is enough.


http://www.bartleby.com/173/4.html

So what if nobody is big enough to call a halt to the mess created by
Flamsteed,theorists such as Newton and Albert would'nt be capable of
knowing what went wrong and merrily built their opinions on the wrong
value for the Earth's axial rotation which in turn affects it
relationship to orbital motion.

A sign of an astronomer is to know how the Pre- Copernican average 24
hour day and the Equation of Time correction translates into that
independent and constant axial rotation of 15 degrees per hour and 24
hours exactly in total for a full rotation.

Newton got it badly wrong and while calling people vulgar for not
knowing how the equable 24 hour day relates to the natural unequal day
via the Equation of Time correction,he himself gets it wrong.Why
anyone would want to continue with the dumbest mistake ever witnessed
I do not know but as a relentless comedy,the relativistic opinion is
the homocentric fruit of that dumb mistake made by Flamsteed.


http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~...ongitude2.html

Let everyone really enjoy the mind of Einstein 10 years after H.G.
Wells wrote of the 4th dimension and maybe someday they will suffer
the horror of knowing how it energed from a single and simple error or
oversight that was made 300 years earlier.

http://www.classic-novels.com/author...chine001.shtml

You have been tilting at this windmill - forever. Next you will need knee
replacement and welfare!





Oriel36 wrote:

"Mike" wrote in message news:RtX9e.43455$yV3.22742@clgrps12...
Here is some dinner time reading to contemplate.

http://lorentz.phl.jhu.edu/AnnusMira...es/eins_lq.pdf

http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/

http://lorentz.phl.jhu.edu/AnnusMira.../eins_diss.pdf

http://lorentz.phl.jhu.edu/AnnusMira...s_brownian.pdf

http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

enjoy!

Enjoy indeed !,I think it is absolutely hilarious but for those who
have yet to enjoy the technical ins and outs of the most freakish
concept ever to appear on the planet,there is always the dumbed down
version of a great work of fiction that supersedes the Da Vinci Code
for value.

http://www.bartleby.com/173/

To really enjoy the hocus pocus,take a step back to Newton.The
pre-Copernican average 24 hour day derived from the Equation of time
correction translates into constant rotation at 15 degrees per hour
and 24 hours for a full rotation within a Copernican/Keplerian
heliocentric framework.

Newton after correctly identifying the Equation of Time,forgets that
the average 24 hour day translates into constant axial rotation
corresponding to 24 hours/360 degrees and adopts Flamsteed's false
'proof' for constant axial rotation at 23 hours 56 min 04 sec.

http://hypertextbook.com/facts/1999/JennyChen.shtml

What a big mistake with really big consequences!!.

As for Albert,well he is a complete astronomical cretin ,given that he
not only ties rotation to the 'fixed star' but he attributes the value
as the 24 hour astronomical day it is enough.

http://www.bartleby.com/173/4.html

So what if nobody is big enough to call a halt to the mess created by
Flamsteed,theorists such as Newton and Albert would'nt be capable of
knowing what went wrong and merrily built their opinions on the wrong
value for the Earth's axial rotation which in turn affects it
relationship to orbital motion.

A sign of an astronomer is to know how the Pre- Copernican average 24
hour day and the Equation of Time correction translates into that
independent and constant axial rotation of 15 degrees per hour and 24
hours exactly in total for a full rotation.

Newton got it badly wrong and while calling people vulgar for not
knowing how the equable 24 hour day relates to the natural unequal day
via the Equation of Time correction,he himself gets it wrong.Why
anyone would want to continue with the dumbest mistake ever witnessed
I do not know but as a relentless comedy,the relativistic opinion is
the homocentric fruit of that dumb mistake made by Flamsteed.

http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~...ongitude2.html

Let everyone really enjoy the mind of Einstein 10 years after H.G.
Wells wrote of the 4th dimension and maybe someday they will suffer
the horror of knowing how it energed from a single and simple error or
oversight that was made 300 years earlier.

http://www.classic-novels.com/author...chine001.shtml

The windmills are all yours ,I am enjoying the astronomical freedom
accorded by bypassing 3 centuries worth of trash to get to the
Copernican/Keplerian insights and to experience them in their original
glorious form by actually going outside and putting their precepts into
observational perspective.500 years later you freaks only acknowledge
sunrise,sunset,the constellation ect which are a throwback to
geocentricity and for people who know no better.

What !, are you going to dazzle me with your 'every valid point is the
center of the universe' or some other stupid and silly relativistic
notion,all that tells me is that you never experienced the majesty of
the Copernican/Keplerian insight,this insight alone seperates the
theortical slaves of mathematicians from real astronomers.

At least denominational Christianity has fought the tendency of people
to believe that the Da Vinci code is something other than pure fiction
while weakminded men accepted Albert's version of H.G. Wells 'Time
Machine' as something real.No offense but it does not get any worse
than a type of slavery to fiction,sort of like the whole world is in
the middle of a star trek convention without knowing it.

How do you like your position as the scavengers of empirical trickle
down physics,a scheme to keep the celebrities fed and going to
conventions and with nothing absolutely nothing to do with the noble
discipline of Kepler,Copernicus and Roemer.

"although they have extracted from them the apparent motions, with
numerical agreement, nevertheless . . . . They are just like someone
including in a picture hands, feet, head, and other limbs from
different places, well painted indeed, but not modeled from the same
body, and not in the least matching each other, so that a monster would
be produced from them rather than a man. Thus in the process of their
demonstrations, which they call their system, they are found either to
have missed out something essential, or to have brought in something
inappropriate and wholly irrelevant, which would not have happened to
them if they had followed proper principles. For if the hypotheses
which they assumed had not been fallacies, everything which follows
from them could be independently verified." De revolutionibus, 1543

That is exactly what happened with Newton,he managed to extend and
shorten Sun/Earth distances but you cannot set that framework in motion
because it is a monster which is in direct conflict with Keplerian
motion.I enjoy the freedom of understanding what Newton did badly and
that is the difference between cataloguing freaks who pretend to
accomplish astronomy and real astronomers.

I will admire any person who attempts to recover the dignity of
astronomy and the magnificent heritage from this lousy relativistic
racket,that is the only reward.

MMMMmmmmm.....
No "PGP Signed" on this post either (he typed, referring to another
min-type posting). Boy you are getting sloppy min. Or am I mistaken?
If so we can refer to you as mini-min...

Erik
socalsw

On 2 May 2005 11:26:40 -0700, "Erik" wrote:

MMMMmmmmm.....
No "PGP Signed" on this post either (he typed, referring to another
min-type posting). Boy you are getting sloppy min. Or am I mistaken?
If so we can refer to you as mini-min...

This guy isn't Min. Even Min is clever enough to be able to tell time.

_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com

hence the mini.

Erik
socalsw

Funny,funny,funny.

Do you know that the Earth has a single and independent axial motion
therefore you do NOT have a choice in determining the value for that
motion or that it is relative to this or relative to that.Once you get
over that shock you will eventually enjoy how our ancestors used
exquisite reasoning using the Sun as a reference for the pre-Copernican
average 24 hour day or constant axial rotation as an independent motion
in the Copernican/Keplerian heliocentric framework

Then you can really enjoy the National Maritime Museum's attempt to
justify the utterly stupid notion that men have a choice in the matter
,but it is not half as funny as Wikipedia.

"Each solar day the Earth rotates 360=BA with respect to the Sun.
Similarly the Earth rotates 360=BA with respect to the background stars
in a sidereal day. During each solar day, the motion of the Earth
around the Sun means the Earth rotates 361=BA with respect to the
background stars."

http://www.nmm.ac.uk/server/show/nav.00500300l005001000

I personally like the creative version found in Wikipedia where 23
hours 56 min 04 sec 'wraps around' as 24 hours but then again you
humorless freaks don't know a joke when you see it.

"When one moves eastward 15=B0 in longitude, sidereal time is larger by
one hour (note that it wraps around at 24 hours). "

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidereal_time

The oldest building in Europe is Newgrange which is much older than
Stonehenge,for the last 5200 years it accurately marks the annual
cycle.You freaks could'nt build such monuments because you tied the
Earth's axial and orbital motion to a calendrical average which
requires an adjustment every 4 years.You are not fit to comment on my
astronomical heritage so go back to your mathematical theorists who
will send you on wild goosechases looking for Isaac's and Albert's
exotic and nonexistent garbage.

I had a look at your website and especially your vacuous comments on
the Eygptians.

http://www.cloudbait.com/archaeo/egypt.html

An astronomer must also be a geometer,you unfortunate creatures had
this faculty beaten out of you by theorists who have sucked the virtue
out of astronomy and left a shell conception which takes the name of
astronomy and astronomer.

http://www.metrum.org/measures/dimensions.htm

Whatever drives you freaks to adopted the principles which inflict
cartoon conceptions of the Earth's motions on humanity,the loss of
discussion is my fate,nobody has courage enough to leave the novelistic
dross and get back into the intricacies of astronomy and geometry.

Perhaps you think the insults mean something to me,they don't,only the
awful silence is the insult .

And yet, you keep posting. Seriously, you are a cacophony of one note
with the intellectual capacity of a dart, mini-min. I think I will
stick with the voodoo physics that has resulted in space flight and
exploration (gee, that cartoon physics seems to have worked just fine
for them...) I am now bored of you.


Erik
socalsw