metal optics, superluminal tunneling effects, spin formula in electrodynamics

"Josef Matz" wrote in message
...
This is a collection on discussions on superluminal effects, spin effects
and metall optics discussions. Some notes are in german and others written
in english.
The references to Nimtz home page and another link to rotating blood cells
in a light field are given.
Answers are given for frequently asked questions on the top 3 topics:
1. Frustrated internal total reflection (Nimtz experiment) - superluminal
behaviour
2. Spin flux formula for electromagnetic waves
3. Energy formulas in metal optics


The Nimtz Experiment (Overlightvelocities of the tunneling waves between
two
prisms when total reflection condition is fulfilled) has nothing to do
with
special relativity or even relativistic quantum mechanics. It is a general
effect. It has to do with the possibilty of having complex field vectors
in
classical electrodynamics. It is an outcome of the full theory for the
complex refraction index n. It is also outcome of the fact that light can
travel with lower velocities than the velocity of light and light becomes
absorbed when going through matter. It is the follow of the fact, that in
matter fields are complex and the propagation vektor k is complex.

If somebody of the quantummechanics guys has an better explanation, please
tell me. It is an irony of history that it has not been found how the
complex index works (the theory has no energyfluxes at all) and because
one
thought that Quantum mechanics will solve all problems this theory has
been
put aside. Sometimes you find in the books that the theory is fully
ununderstandable and a reference to a book from 1939 Stratton.

Fact is there exist no energy fluxes in Strattons theory but the theory
might exist somwhere else. But i think this is not the case. I wanted to
make my promotion in 1992 in this field. Therefore i know the outcome. I
was
not allowed to work on such an topic.

That is because your professors knew what the outcome would be, and did not
want anything controvorsial.


The nimtz experiment is true and can be explained by the full theory of
complex index.

And in our books is a mistake while treating staples of different index.
Thats the cause why no energy fluxes exist in this theory.

Prof. Nimtz at the University of cologne and i assume many of his
colleagues
in the world measured microwaves to transmit the vacuum gap between two
prisms with nearly infinite velocities when the
total reflection condition is fulfilled. It tunnels between the two
surfaces
and hereby makes an instantaneous hop = nearly infinite velocity. Also a
signal like mozart music can be repeatet and therfore signaling with
nearly infinite velocities is possible.

Sensation !

Overlight velocities can be explained whenever you see the imaginary
component of a complex valued wave take precedence over the real component.
Imaginary valued vompomnents can still result in observable real work, so it
is not a surprise the effects of FTL action can still be observed.


What are our present theories worth if they can´t predict and describe
such
a simple experiment ?
I fear that something fundamental is wrong in what we call true physics.


It is not that the present theories concerning quantum behavior are wrong.
No. It is rather that they are incomplete because they assume that any
quantum action is caused by a balanced matte wave. there are many examples
where this is not so - one component of the wave may indeed take precedence
over the other component, resulting in alternate behaviours.... when the
real component of the probability wave is superior, a quantum event is
measured. Measurement is a static solution to wthe wave equation. When the
imaginary component is superior, interesting FTL effects can be seet to
occure. Under natural conditions, such as under total internal reflection,
the speed of photons can be infinite - or rather that speed is whatever the
experiment is designed to measure.

I propose Prof. Nimtz to get the noble price.

Deservedley so.






A last remark: I read that Nimtz tried to treat the results of his
experiments in an official way. But the German Physical Society does not
support this.

Small wonder. Most of the conventional physics socities are comprised of
Csientists - Scientist Poseurs. But when the results of experiment rise up
to slap them in the face they can not deny them. Truth wins eventually.



Greysky

www.allocations.cc
Learn how to build a FTL radio.

"Greysky" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
. ..

"Josef Matz" wrote in message
...
This is a collection on discussions on superluminal effects, spin
effects
and metall optics discussions. Some notes are in german and others
written
in english.
The references to Nimtz home page and another link to rotating blood
cells
in a light field are given.
Answers are given for frequently asked questions on the top 3 topics:
1. Frustrated internal total reflection (Nimtz experiment) -
superluminal
behaviour
2. Spin flux formula for electromagnetic waves
3. Energy formulas in metal optics


The Nimtz Experiment (Overlightvelocities of the tunneling waves between
two
prisms when total reflection condition is fulfilled) has nothing to do
with
special relativity or even relativistic quantum mechanics. It is a
general
effect. It has to do with the possibilty of having complex field vectors
in
classical electrodynamics. It is an outcome of the full theory for the
complex refraction index n. It is also outcome of the fact that light
can
travel with lower velocities than the velocity of light and light
becomes
absorbed when going through matter. It is the follow of the fact, that
in
matter fields are complex and the propagation vektor k is complex.

If somebody of the quantummechanics guys has an better explanation,
please
tell me. It is an irony of history that it has not been found how the
complex index works (the theory has no energyfluxes at all) and because
one
thought that Quantum mechanics will solve all problems this theory has
been
put aside. Sometimes you find in the books that the theory is fully
ununderstandable and a reference to a book from 1939 Stratton.

Fact is there exist no energy fluxes in Strattons theory but the theory
might exist somwhere else. But i think this is not the case. I wanted to
make my promotion in 1992 in this field. Therefore i know the outcome. I
was
not allowed to work on such an topic.

That is because your professors knew what the outcome would be, and did
not
want anything controvorsial.

No they did not know. But the Prof. i took my main lessons in theory did not
believe in complex dielectricity constants, indeed.
My experimental professor was not living anymore in the beginning 90s. I
think he would have fun on that nice symmetries and there
exist more symmetries which must have a meaning.
Indeed i calculated overlightvelocities in the early 90s and spend a lot of
private money to find the energy conservation law by a computer program.
Unsuccessful that time indeed. But when i read about the Nimtz experiment in
1998 in the science paper "Physik in unserer Zeit" (Physics in our times)
i was remembered and it took a while to find the answers on my old question.

Yes its presented here. What is missing are the formulas for the group
velocities in metals, indeed. This would complete the theory.
There are principals for, but they are not complete presently.


The nimtz experiment is true and can be explained by the full theory of
complex index.

And in our books is a mistake while treating staples of different index.
Thats the cause why no energy fluxes exist in this theory.

Prof. Nimtz at the University of cologne and i assume many of his
colleagues
in the world measured microwaves to transmit the vacuum gap between two
prisms with nearly infinite velocities when the
total reflection condition is fulfilled. It tunnels between the two
surfaces
and hereby makes an instantaneous hop = nearly infinite velocity. Also a
signal like mozart music can be repeatet and therfore signaling with
nearly infinite velocities is possible.

Sensation !

Overlight velocities can be explained whenever you see the imaginary
component of a complex valued wave take precedence over the real
component.
Imaginary valued vompomnents can still result in observable real work, so
it
is not a surprise the effects of FTL action can still be observed.

Ok. But it is energy and signal transport which is observed !!! now we can
meat.



What are our present theories worth if they can´t predict and describe
such
a simple experiment ?
I fear that something fundamental is wrong in what we call true physics.


It is not that the present theories concerning quantum behavior are wrong.
No. It is rather that they are incomplete because they assume that any
quantum action is caused by a balanced matte wave. there are many examples
where this is not so - one component of the wave may indeed take
precedence
over the other component, resulting in alternate behaviours.... when the
real component of the probability wave is superior, a quantum event is
measured. Measurement is a static solution to wthe wave equation. When the
imaginary component is superior, interesting FTL effects can be seet to
occure. Under natural conditions, such as under total internal reflection,
the speed of photons can be infinite - or rather that speed is whatever
the
experiment is designed to measure.


The velocities obey very strictly rules. No, they can not take any value.
But the rest sounds ok.

I propose Prof. Nimtz to get the noble price.

Deservedley so.






A last remark: I read that Nimtz tried to treat the results of his
experiments in an official way. But the German Physical Society does not
support this.

Small wonder. Most of the conventional physics socities are comprised of
Csientists - Scientist Poseurs. But when the results of experiment rise up
to slap them in the face they can not deny them. Truth wins eventually.


Yes thats my opinion also. We should clearify if Nimtz is right or not. It
is a revolutionary discovery.
On the other hand i indeed do not understand Nimtz why not more measurement
material is presented.

Important time is lost and all of use would have benifit, if it is true. And
my opinion is: it is true and comes out
from the completed index theory.
Thanks for your comments


Greysky

www.allocations.cc
Learn how to build a FTL radio.