![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok - on the 14th of April Mars and Neptune will be very close
together. I hope to use the opportunity to actually "see" Neptune. I have a 4 inch reflector. My biggest objective gives a 135X magnification. Do I have a snowballs of identifying it? All previous attempts have left me in doubt as to whether I actually saw the damned thing or not. Please assume the worst when thinking of drives - I have nothing fancy so cannot point the scope in anything that claims to be a reasonable facsimile of an RA and Decl. Eugene L Griessel www.dynagen.co.za/eugene He who does not bellow the truth, when he knows the truth Makes himself the accomplice of liars and forgers. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I hope to use the opportunity to actually "see" Neptune. I
have a 4 inch reflector. My biggest objective gives a 135X magnification. Do I have a snowballs of identifying it? At mag 7.9 you should see it. At 2.2 " dia it will be ..small.. about 1/3 the size of Mars :-) -- http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/jc_atm/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 13:51:10 GMT, (Eugene
Griessel) wrote: Ok - on the 14th of April Mars and Neptune will be very close together. I hope to use the opportunity to actually "see" Neptune. I have a 4 inch reflector. My biggest objective gives a 135X magnification. Do I have a snowballs of identifying it? All previous attempts have left me in doubt as to whether I actually saw the damned thing or not. Please assume the worst when thinking of drives - I have nothing fancy so cannot point the scope in anything that claims to be a reasonable facsimile of an RA and Decl. Neptune is quite obvious even at fairly low magnification (well under your 135X). It is bright, obviously extended, and uniquely colored. With your scope it is an easy target... if you can actually find it in the first place. Make sure you have a good chart that shows it in relation to plenty of stars (I'd suggest a computer generated chart). It may take you a while to navigate to the correct position, but once there you should know you have found it. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris L Peterson wrote:
Neptune is quite obvious even at fairly low magnification (well under your 135X). It is bright, obviously extended, and uniquely colored. With your scope it is an easy target... if you can actually find it in the first place. Make sure you have a good chart that shows it in relation to plenty of stars (I'd suggest a computer generated chart). It may take you a while to navigate to the correct position, but once there you should know you have found it. Thanks - with Mars being only 1degree 18 minutes away I think I should have a reasonable starting point this time. Where I am Neptune should be almost due north - so I hope to pin it down this time! Eugene L Griessel www.dynagen.co.za/eugene Hard work has a future payoff. Laziness pays off NOW! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ο "Eugene Griessel" έγραψε στο μήνυμα
... Ok - on the 14th of April Mars and Neptune will be very close together. I hope to use the opportunity to actually "see" Neptune. I have a 4 inch reflector. My biggest objective gives a 135X magnification. Do I have a snowballs of identifying it? All previous attempts have left me in doubt as to whether I actually saw the damned thing or not. Please assume the worst when thinking of drives - I have nothing fancy so cannot point the scope in anything that claims to be a reasonable facsimile of an RA and Decl. I caught a glimpse of it at a much lower magnification, last year from the dark skies in Antiparos, with a pair of Apogee 20x100 aligned with my Tasco on an equatorial mount. My search time was in the ballpark of 15-20 minutes, using Cartes du Ciel and field circles calculated for all my instruments. I do remember going back and forth between EP and program screen a lot, but once I located it it was an easy target. I could not see a disk with the Tasco, since its diameter was much smaller than the resolution limit of the telescope, but it was definitely identifiable, and blue. Try your lowest magnification in order to find it first, then up as needed. Eugene L Griessel www.dynagen.co.za/eugene He who does not bellow the truth, when he knows the truth Makes himself the accomplice of liars and forgers. -- I. N. Galidakis http://users.forthnet.gr/ath/jgal/ Eventually, _everything_ is understandable |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks - with Mars being only 1degree 18 minutes away I think I should
have a reasonable starting point this time. Where I am Neptune should be almost due north - so I hope to pin it down this time! I'll be watching for your report of success! As you say, with Mars there to point the way, you'll find it. Clear Skies Chuck Taylor Do you observe the moon? Try http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lunar-observing/ Are you interested in understanding optics? Try http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ATM_Optics_Software/ ************************************ Eugene L Griessel www.dynagen.co.za/eugene Hard work has a future payoff. Laziness pays off NOW! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eugene Griessel wrote:
Ok - on the 14th of April Mars and Neptune will be very close together. I hope to use the opportunity to actually "see" Neptune. I have a 4 inch reflector. My biggest objective gives a 135X magnification. Do I have a snowballs of identifying it? Yes, easy. You probably won't clearly resolve the disk with 4", but the color should give it away. To me it looks like a dull little English pea color. Mike |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:24:19 -0600, Mike Jones
wrote: Eugene Griessel wrote: Ok - on the 14th of April Mars and Neptune will be very close together. I hope to use the opportunity to actually "see" Neptune. I have a 4 inch reflector. My biggest objective gives a 135X magnification. Do I have a snowballs of identifying it? Yes, easy. You probably won't clearly resolve the disk with 4", but the color should give it away. To me it looks like a dull little English pea color. Mike This colour thing; I've always seen Uranus as greenish, Neptune as blue, which seems to be borne out by the observations of these planets via space probles. However, older people have mentioned that Neptune has seemed green to them, possibly indicating a discolouration of the cornea with age. It's somewhat like when people describe high surface brightness planetary nebula, you often get different opinions on just what colour they see. -Rich |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RichA wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:24:19 -0600, Mike Jones wrote: Eugene Griessel wrote: Ok - on the 14th of April Mars and Neptune will be very close together. I hope to use the opportunity to actually "see" Neptune. I have a 4 inch reflector. My biggest objective gives a 135X magnification. Do I have a snowballs of identifying it? Yes, easy. You probably won't clearly resolve the disk with 4", but the color should give it away. To me it looks like a dull little English pea color. Mike This colour thing; I've always seen Uranus as greenish, Neptune as blue, which seems to be borne out by the observations of these planets via space probles. However, older people have mentioned that Neptune has seemed green to them, possibly indicating a discolouration of the cornea with age. It's somewhat like when people describe high surface brightness planetary nebula, you often get different opinions on just what colour they see. -Rich I'm 53 and fortunately my corneas are still BK7-clear. I think it's more a case of slight differences in individual scotopic response and perception. Neptune appears somewhere between cyan and green (aquamarine?) to me in my 16", but more like just pea-green in my 4" and 6" refractors. I'll agree on Uranus, it's slightly more toward the green. But in smaller apertures I get them at about the same chromaticity. Would be interesting if the OP would report back to SAA on his own perceptions. Interesting that color sensitivity also affects variable star estimates. My old bud Mike Marcario had the most red-sensitive eyes of anyone I ever knew. He would always get deep-red stars like V Hydra a half magnitude or more brighter than the rest of us 3 or 4 guys, using Ron Royer's 12.5" scope. We always agreed on others like SS Cygni to within 0.1 magnitude, it was just the red ones he saw brighter. Mike |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 10:08:02 -0600, Mike Jones
wrote: RichA wrote: On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:24:19 -0600, Mike Jones wrote: Eugene Griessel wrote: Ok - on the 14th of April Mars and Neptune will be very close together. I hope to use the opportunity to actually "see" Neptune. I have a 4 inch reflector. My biggest objective gives a 135X magnification. Do I have a snowballs of identifying it? Yes, easy. You probably won't clearly resolve the disk with 4", but the color should give it away. To me it looks like a dull little English pea color. Mike This colour thing; I've always seen Uranus as greenish, Neptune as blue, which seems to be borne out by the observations of these planets via space probles. However, older people have mentioned that Neptune has seemed green to them, possibly indicating a discolouration of the cornea with age. It's somewhat like when people describe high surface brightness planetary nebula, you often get different opinions on just what colour they see. -Rich I'm 53 and fortunately my corneas are still BK7-clear. I think it's more a case of slight differences in individual scotopic response and perception. Neptune appears somewhere between cyan and green (aquamarine?) to me in my 16", but more like just pea-green in my 4" and 6" refractors. I'll agree on Uranus, it's slightly more toward the green. But in smaller apertures I get them at about the same chromaticity. Would be interesting if the OP would report back to SAA on his own perceptions. I remember Walter Scott Houston said that prior to getting new corneas (cataract operation?) he saw various objects as greenish, but after the operation, they appeared bluish. He attributed it to an increase in the blue-ultraviolet throughput of the artificial corneas. Also, viewing objects lower to the horizon in polluted areas like cities where you have both air pollution and light pollution of whatever spectrum to contend with can alter the perceived colours of objects. -Rich |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kooks of Alt.Astronomy Prove How Stupid They Are | Mad Scientist | Misc | 29 | August 11th 04 08:03 AM |
Stupid Question | Paul Maskell | UK Astronomy | 3 | November 14th 03 03:06 PM |
Another Stupid Question | Flying _Naked_People | Misc | 138 | October 25th 03 12:26 PM |
Stupid Naked Apes In This Newsgroup | Flying _Naked_People | Misc | 16 | September 8th 03 01:52 AM |
Question about alignment & pointing north, level | Mike | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | September 7th 03 12:04 AM |