A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

AC & DC power sources in Apollo spacecraft



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 3rd 05, 08:02 AM
DaveDeWolfe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AC & DC power sources in Apollo spacecraft

I'm a little confused here. Did Apollo spacecraft use both AC and DC
power? If so, why? What about the LM?

I've also read a few histories of the Apollo 13 accident and was
wondering just how was the LM able to charge the CM's reentry
batteries? Was there a hard-wire connection between the two
spacecraft, or was this process another "jury-rigged" procedure like
adapting the carbon dioxide scrubbers??

Thanks, Dave

  #2  
Old January 3rd 05, 05:58 PM
Henry Spencer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com,
DaveDeWolfe wrote:
I'm a little confused here. Did Apollo spacecraft use both AC and DC
power? If so, why? What about the LM?


As rk has already posted, yes, there was AC power aboard, for motors.
It's just a whole lot easier to make good, reliable, efficient motors
if you can drive them with AC. Yes, the LM too.

I've also read a few histories of the Apollo 13 accident and was
wondering just how was the LM able to charge the CM's reentry
batteries? Was there a hard-wire connection between the two
spacecraft...


There was a hand-connected umbilical in the pressurized tunnel between
the two. It was meant for charging the LM's batteries from the CSM, and
some improvising had to be done to send power the other way, but the
hardware was already in place.
--
"Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer
-- George Herbert |
  #6  
Old January 4th 05, 01:24 AM
OM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 00:32:07 GMT, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote:

Easy, rather than pointing the LM down so the electricity flows downhill,
they put it on top so it would flow the other way.


....Someone give me a good reason why I shouldn't plonk Greg back into
Killfile Hell, please?

OM

--

"No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m
his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society

- General George S. Patton, Jr
  #7  
Old January 4th 05, 03:51 AM
gcash
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

OM om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org writes:

On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 00:32:07 GMT, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote:

Easy, rather than pointing the LM down so the electricity flows downhill,
they put it on top so it would flow the other way.


...Someone give me a good reason why I shouldn't plonk Greg back into
Killfile Hell, please?


Because sometimes he has a sense of humor? Hey, I thought it was funny.

And you (and others) have never learned "Please Do Not Feed The Troll"

It's far far better to silently plonk them and ignore them, than to give them
the attention they're whoring for. Lots of sad people live for the sound of a
"plonk", it's kind of like S&M, and it's usually the only attention they can
get.

I have an "anti-kill" file, it marks posts by certain people such as Henry or
Mary in bold as important, with a key I can hit to go directly to the next
one.

After that, I'll usually read the associated thread if it sounds interesting
from what Henry quoted. I figure if Henry thought it worth participating, it's
worth reading. I then just hit "mark all as read", and that's about it.

I can also mark certain subjects as interesting.

Of course hpywife-whatever, Bob Haller, etc, are in permanent killfile
hell. And all my sci.space.* killfiles are linked, so a plonk in one group
works for all.

Makes life much more bearable.

-gc

--
Christmas is weird. What other time of the year do you sit in front of
a dead tree and eat candy out of your socks?
-- (alt.gothic)
  #8  
Old January 4th 05, 07:42 PM
Andre Lieven
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


OM (om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org) writes:
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 00:32:07 GMT, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote:

Easy, rather than pointing the LM down so the electricity flows downhill,
they put it on top so it would flow the other way.


...Someone give me a good reason why I shouldn't plonk Greg back into
Killfile Hell, please?


Because that was funny. g

Andre
--
" I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
The Man Prayer, Red Green.
  #9  
Old January 4th 05, 04:00 AM
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote:

Easy, rather than pointing the LM down so the electricity flows downhill,
they put it on top so it would flow the other way.


Where's that damn hook when you need it? :-)

Pat

  #10  
Old January 4th 05, 05:01 AM
Henry Spencer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
OM om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org wrote:
...It was meant for charging the LM's batteries from the CSM, and
some improvising had to be done to send power the other way, but the
hardware was already in place.


...This begs explanation. Has NASA or any of the "Tiger Team" ever
given the full details on how the CSM/LM stack was reconfigured in
flight to allow the current to go the other way?


If memory serves, it was reportedly necessary to start with the CM
charging the LM, and then fiddle with details to reverse the flow.
But I've never seen further detail. Must read the paper rk turned up...
--
"Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer
-- George Herbert |
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apollo Buzz alDredge Misc 5 July 28th 04 10:05 AM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ darla Astronomy Misc 15 July 25th 04 02:57 PM
The apollo faq the inquirer Misc 4 April 15th 04 04:45 AM
The apollo faq the inquirer UK Astronomy 5 April 15th 04 04:45 AM
FA: Spacecraft Films Apollo 11 & Apollo 14 DVD Sets cp History 0 August 7th 03 12:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.