![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Offshore CEO" wrote in message
news ![]() On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 20:56:59 -0800, Ron Webb wrote: Lots of problems left, including the 117 day long "days". There are books on this subject, but I can't find a referance at the moment. This is probably the biggest problem. AFAIK we do not have plant or animal life that can live with days that long, and the human psyche is not up to it, either. I am still of the opinion that the most livable places in the solar system are those where the length of a day is at most 50 hours, any more than that and life gets upset. Building greenhouses on Mars or even asteroids is probably the easiest way into space. Lots of sunlight, in intervals short enough. We know how to build greenhouses and a cubic kilometer of ice and carbon should be enough mass to compensate for a slightly unbalanced biosystem, for a very long time... Diatoms do not get upset about too long of day, and I do believe the solar spectrum worth of 400~450 nm is getting sufficiently into and even somewhat effectively through them relatively cool clouds of Venus. Diatoms should very much like photons of 425 nm. There's sufficient buoyancy as to sustain a Venus form of advanced/mutated diatom as flying much like a micro rigid airship, either by having a lighter gas (perhaps H2) interior or perhaps just a sufficient amount of vacuum could make such a silica diatom quite aeromatic, especially if there's sufficient winds aloft as to help promote that flight of such micro silica airships. Speaking of "Terraforming" the likes of Venus, of which I believe this notion is way outside of even the most advance human capability, not to mention the terawatts of resources. However, as per terraforming our moon isn't such a bad nor insurmountable notion. Terraforming the Moon; this notion is merely pulverising it with a few tonnes worth of dry-ice(CO2) per year, plus a few other heavy elements (radon if need be) that'll stick around long enough to create a usable terminal velocity(Vt). Once able to access the moon via conventional methods of reentry and deployments, then we're into the hollow rilles and/or geode pockets for a little personal protection from the lunar surface environment that'll need some further work before it's breathable (if ever). At least robotics well become affordably doable and thereby enabling the next logical phase of helping to establish the LSE-CM/ISS lobby or base camp abodes. There's a couple of slight details that'll need your expertise, and if you need some ideas and/or notions as to what those might represent, just ask and you will receive. Regards, Brad Guth / BBC h2g2 U206251 http://guthvenus.tripod.com/update-242.htm -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GUTH Venus is way too hot for even Bad Astronomy | Jon G | Policy | 29 | January 2nd 07 03:25 AM |
Space Calendar - January 28, 2005 | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | January 31st 05 09:33 AM |
Long post, transit of Venus 1882 | John Carruthers | UK Astronomy | 13 | March 22nd 04 05:54 PM |
Space Calendar - January 27, 2004 | Ron | History | 6 | January 29th 04 07:11 AM |
Space Calendar - July 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | July 24th 03 11:26 PM |