New cosmological anomalies reported

Cosmic oddity casts doubt on theory of universe

The crazy fact about this anomaly is that my older brother,
Dr. Richard Shubert, predicted it many years ago. Presumably
there are, at least, several similar anomalies connected with
it.

http://www.everythingimportant.org/viewtopic.php?t=989

"Eugene Shubert" wrote in
message ups.com...
Cosmic oddity casts doubt on theory of universe

The crazy fact about this anomaly is that my older brother,
Dr. Richard Shubert, predicted it many years ago. Presumably
there are, at least, several similar anomalies connected with
it.

http://www.everythingimportant.org/viewtopic.php?t=989


Could those local anomalies projected to all local systems of the universe
effectively merge to produce some universal stereotypical then common to
all, outside-in facing against each and every local constituent input?

Brad

glbrad01 wrote:
"Eugene Shubert" wrote in

message ups.com...
Cosmic oddity casts doubt on theory of universe

The crazy fact about this anomaly is that my older brother,
Dr. Richard Shubert, predicted it many years ago. Presumably
there are, at least, several similar anomalies connected with
it.

http://www.everythingimportant.org/viewtopic.php?t=989


Could those local anomalies projected to all local systems of the
universe
effectively merge to produce some universal stereotypical then common
to
all, outside-in facing against each and every local constituent
input?

Brad

Take the easy route; stop trying to patch up/repair Big Bang, throw it
in the bin, and get some effort into finding the real reason for the
apparent shifting of light spectrums.

Jim G
c=c+v

wrote in message
oups.com...

glbrad01 wrote:
"Eugene Shubert" wrote in

message ups.com...
Cosmic oddity casts doubt on theory of universe

The crazy fact about this anomaly is that my older brother,
Dr. Richard Shubert, predicted it many years ago. Presumably
there are, at least, several similar anomalies connected with
it.

http://www.everythingimportant.org/viewtopic.php?t=989


Could those local anomalies projected to all local systems of the
universe
effectively merge to produce some universal stereotypical then common
to
all, outside-in facing against each and every local constituent
input?

Brad

Take the easy route; stop trying to patch up/repair Big Bang, throw it
in the bin, and get some effort into finding the real reason for the
apparent shifting of light spectrums.

Jim G
c=c+v


You're talking to the wrong person when it comes to patching up or
repairing the so-called Big Bang. The concept of the Big Bang and resulting
insanities are products of totally finite minds (the products of totally
finite dimensionality).

I don't need to apply any more effort to explaining apparent shifting of
light spectrums. I've finally after all these years realized that we can't
observe space in any way, shape, or form. That alone wipes out the
"space-time continuum" as it is pictured for us to be, sending it into the
realm of virtuality (virtual space-time continuum) rather than reality.
Also, light itself, as "light," is fully integrated with time and means
nothing whatsoever outside the context of "light-time" (light-second,
light-minute, light-hour, light-day, light-year). It has no independent
dimensions, no independent state, no independent existence, most
particularly no independent velocity, separate from time's. Light will
measure distance-time but not in only one dimension. It will measure two
dimensions of distance-time.

When a traveling light-time frame is one light second from any source,
that source has in the meantime advanced in time within its own entity one
second beyond origination of the light-time frame. This makes two dimensions
of distance extended from origination, going in differing directions from
origination. At light's two light seconds' point away from origination, the
source of origination is concurrently two seconds advanced in time from that
same origination of the light-time frame. An expanding universe in progress
in time. The light-time frame doesn't know space from Adam, it is a stilled
clock, a painting of a frame of time, dimensionally time-traveling,
extending away from origination in one direction of time equal to the
source's extending away from that same origination in quite a different
direction of time. Thus the light-time frame is constantly extending
geometrically its distance--in time--from a source that is itself traveling
the same speed--in time--away from the point of origination of that same
light-time frame. When it is one milllion [light years] advanced away from
point of origination (if it makes it that far unimpeded), the source will
concurrently be one million [years] advanced away from that same point of
origination of that particular light-time frame (unimpeded as its
conditional state makes no difference).

When, and if, it is 10 billion [light years] away...., the source will
concurrently be 10 billion [years] away....

Brad

wrote in message
oups.com...

glbrad01 wrote:
"Eugene Shubert" wrote in

message ups.com...
Cosmic oddity casts doubt on theory of universe

The crazy fact about this anomaly is that my older brother,
Dr. Richard Shubert, predicted it many years ago. Presumably
there are, at least, several similar anomalies connected with
it.

http://www.everythingimportant.org/viewtopic.php?t=989


Could those local anomalies projected to all local systems of the
universe
effectively merge to produce some universal stereotypical then common to
all, outside-in facing against each and every local constituent input?

Take the easy route; stop trying to patch up/repair Big Bang, throw it
in the bin, and get some effort into finding the real reason for the
apparent shifting of light spectrums.

Before getting too excited Jim, note the above article
is from a forum. Take a look at the list of subject
areas on the site:

http://www.everythingimportant.org/

Then ask yourself if this is likely to be an unbiased
scientific examination of the data.

George

George Dishman wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

glbrad01 wrote:
"Eugene Shubert" wrote
in

message
ups.com...
Cosmic oddity casts doubt on theory of universe

The crazy fact about this anomaly is that my older brother,
Dr. Richard Shubert, predicted it many years ago. Presumably
there are, at least, several similar anomalies connected with
it.

http://www.everythingimportant.org/viewtopic.php?t=989


Could those local anomalies projected to all local systems of
the
universe
effectively merge to produce some universal stereotypical then
common to
all, outside-in facing against each and every local constituent
input?

Take the easy route; stop trying to patch up/repair Big Bang, throw
it
in the bin, and get some effort into finding the real reason for
the
apparent shifting of light spectrums.

Before getting too excited Jim, note the above article
is from a forum. Take a look at the list of subject
areas on the site:

http://www.everythingimportant.org/

Then ask yourself if this is likely to be an unbiased
scientific examination of the data.

George

Regardless of the information route, it seems you would have to attack
the credibility of Case Western scientists, and the European Center for
Nuclear Research. Personally, I'd feel that "evidence" provided by the
likes of van D
or Franz H is more likely to be from a biased source/misinterpretted.
Jim G
c'=c+v

wrote in message
oups.com...


Regardless of the information route, it seems you would
have to attack the credibility of Case Western scientists,
and the European Center for Nuclear Research.

Not at all, I am not decrying the science at all. There
are dozens of papers on this subject and I have no doubt
there is something yet to be understood. What I am saying
is that the interpretation being put on the data by that
site (that the Earth is at the centre of the universe) is
certainly not warranted by the evidence.

Personally, I'd feel that "evidence" provided by the
likes of van D or Franz H is more likely to be from
a biased source/misinterpretted.

Perhaps, but I have been reading their contributions for
some time and what they say is almost always accurate and
unbiased in those posts where I know enough to be able to
judge.

George

In message , George Dishman
writes


Before getting too excited Jim, note the above article
is from a forum. Take a look at the list of subject
areas on the site:

http://www.everythingimportant.org/

Then ask yourself if this is likely to be an unbiased
scientific examination of the data.

It's been _posted_ to a forum, and it looks like a respectable bit of
science reporting which has appeared in other places beside the Globe
and Mail site. It's on Astronomy at
http://www.astronomy.com/default.aspx?c=a&id=2640, for instance.
Though I think in this case you're quite right to shoot the messenger.
Here's a link to the original article.
http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/serv...=normal&id=PRL
TAO000093000022221301000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=Yes
--
Support the DEC Tsunami Appeal http://www.dec.org.uk/.
Remove spam and invalid from address to reply.