A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old January 29th 05, 05:19 PM
Nora Baron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem

Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Change A^abu to Abuc below


Right.


A^abu are globally constant "phases" canonically conjugate to the Sab


space-time rotation Lie algebra generators of O(1,3). When O(1,3) is
locally gauged then the spin connection coefficients are arbitrary
functions in which the torsion tensor field of Gennady Shipov is the
compensating field. This is beyond 1916 GR.

That is

A^abc are globally constant "phases" canonically conjugate to the Sab


space-time rotation Lie algebra generators of O(1,3). When O(1,3) is
locally gauged then the spin connection coefficients are arbitrary
functions in which the torsion tensor field of Gennady Shipov is the
compensating field. This is beyond 1916 GR.


Yes, this second version of the paragraph makes total sense,
whereas the first version was utterly impenetrable gibberish.
I must confess that after reading the first paragraph, I thought,
"Who is this nitwit Shipov, and why is he stealing radishes from
my garden?" Whereas now I see that Gennady Shipov is the greatest
genius of all time and his torsion tensor field is among the very
finest of torsion tensor fields available in retail outlets around
the world. I do not begrudge him a single radish. As for 1916
GR, yes. Totally beyond. As AE himself would have said, das
ist klar! It is Jack's terse but brilliant addition of the phrase
'That is' which explains all and causes the scales to fall from
one's eyes.


Of course A^abu is a VARIABLE, but only because of the T4

compensating
field Bu^a in

eu^a = (Kronecker Delta)u^a + Bu^a

since

A^abu(x) = eu^b(x)A^abc



Now here by contrast, we see the sad effect of trying to water
down the truth for the mass market, and it brings nothing but
humiliation to the author. Making Zielinski's breathtaking oeuvre
accessible to the average pro wrestling fan is simply not necessary
OR sufficient, and unlikely to bring trinkgeld into one's coffers,
eh? So why bring it up? Spare us your apologies. I do hope
sci.military appreciates the implications however.

Nora B.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Big Bang Busted in Science Classes for High Schools G=EMC^2 Glazier Misc 488 July 18th 04 07:18 PM
How Did the Jarosite Form at Meridiani? Sir Charles W. Shults III Astronomy Misc 127 April 1st 04 03:11 PM
ODDS AGAINST EVOLUTION (You listenin', t.o.?) Lord Blacklight Astronomy Misc 56 November 21st 03 02:45 PM
Space Calendar - August 28, 2003 Ron Baalke History 0 August 28th 03 05:32 PM
Blackholes Don't Tilt G=EMC^2 Glazier Misc 60 August 19th 03 02:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.