![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How much has the Polar Shift caused by the recent 9.0 earthquake affected the
circa 2000 star charts? Jerry |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jerry Pool wrote:
How much has the Polar Shift caused by the recent 9.0 earthquake affected the circa 2000 star charts? You need to shift all of your object coordinates by one-half of a millionth of an arcsecond. Better update your charts ASAP! While I marvel at the innumeracy of the press and the public during this current game of urban myth "telephone," let me make a couple of points: 1. The shift is predicted by a numerical model developed by Richard Gross at JPL. This is not a measurement, it's the prediction of a model. 2. Part of the reason it hasn't been measured is because the model's predictions are too small to measure with current technology. Example: The model predicts a speed-up in the Earth's rotation of 2.7 microseconds. The earth's rotational period can't be measured to an accuracy any better than 20 microseconds. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqinthenews/2004/usslav/neic_slav_faq.html But, you know, just to be on the safe side, I recommend that you buy replacements for all of your charts and charting software as soon as possible. Mojo -- Morris Jones * Monrovia, CA http://www.whiteoaks.com Old Town Astronomers: http://www.otastro.org |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jerry Pool wrote:
How much has the Polar Shift caused by the recent 9.0 earthquake affected the circa 2000 star charts? Take the data at its source, at the IERS : http://hpiers.obspm.fr/eop-pc/produc...bined/C04.html And you can check that nothing special happened to the pole position on 12/26 : http://minilien.com/?YVyrReO6D6 By the way bulletin C has just fallen : "NO positive leap second will be introduced at the end of June 2005." while it seemed the current value of UTC-UT1 could have justified it, http://dulle.free.fr/alidade/leap_second.php (in french but the plot is self explanatory) but the trend of UT1-TAI over the last few years might have been a good reason to delay any positive leap second as much as possible. -- francois meyer http://dulle.free.fr/alidade/galerie.php?maxim=12 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How much has the Polar Shift caused by the recent 9.0 earthquake affected
the circa 2000 star charts? At least a few places to the right of the least significant digit in the most accurate catalogs. The pole position is always moving in a fairly random way, and this tectonic event didn't have a significant effect on the orientation of the axis. _______________________________________________ __ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com Thanks Chris Jerry http://hometown.aol.com/nlpjp/index.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Image viewer | Pete Lawrence | UK Astronomy | 15 | December 17th 04 09:21 PM |
question about the red shift and the velosity of the galaxies | andreas | UK Astronomy | 2 | September 25th 04 05:01 PM |
Polar Shift & Earth's Crust | Mad Scientist | Misc | 13 | August 12th 04 10:48 PM |
Underwater Cities Evidence For An Ancient Polar Shift | Mad Scientist | Misc | 10 | July 26th 04 09:22 PM |
Water ice discovered at South Polar Cap of Mars. | MarkMcDonald | Space Science Misc | 1 | February 14th 04 01:10 AM |