![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From "Space Station Mission Opposed
Despite Safety Concerns of Some Experts, NASA Decided to Send New Crew" By Eric Pianin and Kathy Sawyer Washington Post Staff Writers Thursday, October 23, 2003; Page A01 "Two officials responsible for health and environmental conditions on the space station refused to approve the launch of the new crew, instead signing a dissent that warned about "the continued degradation" of the environmental monitoring and health maintenance systems and exercise equipment vital to the astronauts' well-being. NASA's flight team is unable to assess the quality of air or water and the radiation levels aboard the space lab because of a growing array of hardware problems that have not been corrected and that may constitute the kind of subtle, creeping risk that NASA officials have vowed to avoid based on the harsh lessons learned from the Feb. 1 Columbia shuttle accident, according to documents, minutes and interviews obtained by The Washington Post. The problems with monitoring environmental conditions aboard the space station have festered for more than a year, some NASA medical officials said. Space station astronauts have shown such symptoms as headaches, dizziness and "an inability to think clearly," according to a medical official who asked not to be named. The onboard sensors designed to provide real-time analysis of the air, water and radiation levels have been broken for months, which has made it impossible to determine at any given time whether there is a buildup of trace amounts of dangerous chemical compounds that could sicken the astronauts, or worse. Nigel J. Packham, a NASA environmental factors specialist, said at the meeting that while controls were in place to respond to large releases of gases such as oxygen, nitrogen and carbon dioxide, "no capability exists" to monitor trace contaminant accumulations that over time could pose serious risks to the astronauts working and living in close quarters, according to the minutes. There are more than 200 hazardous materials and chemicals aboard the space station that must be tracked and accounted for to protect the astronauts. The two-man crew scheduled to return from the space station on Monday will bring along a "solid sorbent air sampler" that will show NASA scientists the composition of the air aboard the station during one 24-hour period. NASA officials have promised to send up, through a Russian Progress supply craft, a replacement device for monitoring radiation levels, and said they intend to work out the problems with the exercise equipment and the defibrillator. But the results of the air sampling will not be known until December." --------- Sounds a little scary. Like they won't be able to tell if there is a slow decrease of O2 or slow build up of CO2, which could cause them to just go to sleep and stop breathing. Ellen |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Space Station crew reacts to successful China launch | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | October 15th 03 06:43 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |
NASA and "Oil" Culture burned Cops + Astronauts to death | inventor84 | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 2nd 03 11:41 PM |
Space Station Agency Leaders Look To The Future | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 30th 03 05:51 PM |