![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Optical telescopes would also be more useful, or at
least more easily serviced, than ones in orbit. Being on fixed ground would make large arrays more feasible than in space. Low gravity and vacuum should make large structures possible - but the day/night (sun/shadow) temperature extremes would present challenges. Stick it in a part of a deep crater that's always in shadow? (Might be easier near the poles I suppose.) Martin -- M.A.Poyser Tel.: 07967 110890 Manchester, U.K. http://www.fleetie.demon.co.uk |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Putting it too deep in a crater would limit the field of view. Even with one
in a crater at EACH pole they would be unable to view the (local) celestial equator unless they were high enough to no longer be in the permanent shadow that would be the reason for choosing those craters. "Fleetie" wrote in message ... Optical telescopes would also be more useful, or at least more easily serviced, than ones in orbit. Being on fixed ground would make large arrays more feasible than in space. Low gravity and vacuum should make large structures possible - but the day/night (sun/shadow) temperature extremes would present challenges. Stick it in a part of a deep crater that's always in shadow? (Might be easier near the poles I suppose.) Martin -- M.A.Poyser Tel.: 07967 110890 Manchester, U.K. http://www.fleetie.demon.co.uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What makes an ideal Moon base? | Ami Silberman | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | January 22nd 05 01:55 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | Astronomy Misc | 15 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | Misc | 10 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |
The Apollo FAQ (moon landings were faked) | Nathan Jones | UK Astronomy | 8 | February 4th 04 06:48 PM |
The Apollo Moon Hoax FAQ v4.1 November 2003 | Nathan Jones | Misc | 20 | November 11th 03 07:33 PM |