![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm sure somebody will explain it better than I can but here goes...
The 'big bang' wasn't an explosion of matter *into* space, rather it was the expansansion of space itself - and it's still expanding today. There is no 'outside' of the universe, as in the same way there is nowhere north of the north pole (as Hawking once put it), so it is unlikely the expansion is being fed from an external source. However, it is possible there is a driving force behind the expansion of the universe. We have recently discovered the universe is expanding faster and faster rather than slowing down, so it is assumed there is a 'dark energy' accelerating matter further apart over large distances - a sort of anti-gravity. Dark matter is the term used to describe the extra amount of matter we can't detect through our telescopes but we can tell is there from the way galaxies rotate. It appears there should be more matter than we can currently see, so the stuff we can't see we call dark matter. I think that's roughly correct, anyway! Paul. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | September 9th 04 06:30 AM |
The Gravitational Instability Theory on the Formation of the Universe | Br Dan Izzo | Policy | 6 | September 7th 04 09:29 PM |
The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory | Br Dan Izzo | Astronomy Misc | 8 | September 7th 04 12:07 AM |
The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory | Br Dan Izzo | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 31st 04 02:35 AM |
Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult? | Yoda | Misc | 102 | August 2nd 04 02:33 AM |