![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Quick question here that I've thought about in the past and always
assumed what the answer was but would like to hear some thoughts: Do we know of any stars that exist outside of the influence of a galaxy? If so, which direction are they moving? Are they stars that once existed within the influence of a galaxy or are there nebula/gas clouds that are stellar nursury? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are they stars that once
existed within the influence of a galaxy or are there nebula/gas clouds that are stellar nursury? What's a stellar nursury? _______ Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me! A HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo"http://journal s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo/A |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Southern Hospitality wrote: Quick question here that I've thought about in the past and always assumed what the answer was but would like to hear some thoughts: Do we know of any stars that exist outside of the influence of a galaxy? No. As far as I know, no intergalactic stars have been observed. If so, which direction are they moving? Are they stars that once existed within the influence of a galaxy or are there nebula/gas clouds that are stellar nursury? Star formation occurs in relatively dense clouds. The density of intergalacric matter is far too low to allow star formation All the best Jurgen |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
J.Barsuhn wrote:
Southern Hospitality wrote: Quick question here that I've thought about in the past and always assumed what the answer was but would like to hear some thoughts: Do we know of any stars that exist outside of the influence of a galaxy? No. As far as I know, no intergalactic stars have been observed. If so, which direction are they moving? Are they stars that once existed within the influence of a galaxy or are there nebula/gas clouds that are stellar nursury? Star formation occurs in relatively dense clouds. The density of intergalacric matter is far too low to allow star formation All the best Jurgen In principle, I think a star could be ejected from a galaxy after being formed. A low mass star could (theoretically at least) go in crazy trajectory after a close encounter with a much heavier star. I don't know if this could happen in practice, though... - Alex |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alexander Avtanski wrote:
J.Barsuhn wrote: Southern Hospitality wrote: Quick question here that I've thought about in the past and always assumed what the answer was but would like to hear some thoughts: Do we know of any stars that exist outside of the influence of a galaxy? No. As far as I know, no intergalactic stars have been observed. If so, which direction are they moving? Are they stars that once existed within the influence of a galaxy or are there nebula/gas clouds that are stellar nursury? Star formation occurs in relatively dense clouds. The density of intergalacric matter is far too low to allow star formation All the best Jurgen In principle, I think a star could be ejected from a galaxy after being formed. A low mass star could (theoretically at least) go in crazy trajectory after a close encounter with a much heavier star. I don't know if this could happen in practice, though... - Alex Great! My assumption was that all stars are formed within galaxies. I had also thought that any star that was spotted in intergalactic space would likely have been the result of some past event that flung it outside of it's original home. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Alexander Avtanski
writes J.Barsuhn wrote: Southern Hospitality wrote: Quick question here that I've thought about in the past and always assumed what the answer was but would like to hear some thoughts: Do we know of any stars that exist outside of the influence of a galaxy? No. As far as I know, no intergalactic stars have been observed. If so, which direction are they moving? Are they stars that once existed within the influence of a galaxy or are there nebula/gas clouds that are stellar nursury? Star formation occurs in relatively dense clouds. The density of intergalacric matter is far too low to allow star formation All the best Jurgen In principle, I think a star could be ejected from a galaxy after being formed. A low mass star could (theoretically at least) go in crazy trajectory after a close encounter with a much heavier star. I don't know if this could happen in practice, though... The other way that intergalactic stars could appear is if their galaxy was torn apart, as is happening to the Magellanic Clouds near the Milky Way, and such stars have actually been observed. Look at http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/newsdesk/archive/releases/1997/02/, for instance. Intergalactic stars have also been seen in the Fornax cluster. -- What have they got to hide? Release the ESA Beagle 2 report. Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
S.H There is no star,no particles,or energy,and no light ray that is
not under the influence of gravity. Gravities force goes to infinity. Gravity is the intrinsic force of the universe. All things have inertia,and inertia and gravity are the same thing.. Going with GR all space is curved. You can't get out of space. Bert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: S.H There is no star, no particles, or energy, and no light ray that is not under the influence of gravity. Gravity's force goes to infinity. But at great distances is it negative or positive? Is positive gravity the dark energy that is driving the universal expansion? Gravity is the intrinsic force of the universe. All things have inertia, and inertia and gravity are the same thing.. Going with GR all space is curved. But how is it curved? That is the question. Is it curved only on small scales, like a rubber sheet with many depressions? Or does it have large scale curviture? Is it a sphere-like curve, closed on itself? Or a saddle like curve, open and boundless? Or is it in fact flat on large scales? The longest range observations have indicated that it is at least very close to being flat. You can't get out of space. Bert But Bert, isn't Treb outside of space? Double-A |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Double-A Tomorrow I'll answer your complete post(to many buds at this
spacetime) I will say "Treb" who is not part of our dimensions is not removed from a space that I'm sure we share. Treb's space is just a "folding" in space fabric. He is closer to me than you are Double-A What is close? Instantaneous takes away distance. The speed of light takes away a time lapse. Gravity takes away time,or controls its flow. the speed of a photon,and gravity in its strongest form(black hole) are equivalent to bringing time to zero. If time is zero,than space is zero Bert |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
S.H There is no star,no particles,or energy,and no light ray that is not under the influence of gravity. Gravities force goes to infinity. Gravity is the intrinsic force of the universe. All things have inertia,and inertia and gravity are the same thing.. Going with GR all space is curved. You can't get out of space. Bert My apologies for being too general. I understand that gravity does have a long reach but my question was more geared towards identifying whether or not a star could form outside of a galaxy. I had always assumed they would not and that the only reason why a star would be found outside of a galaxy would be due to the rending that occurs during the merger of two or more galaxies. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A method to improve color planetary imaging? | Robert Clark | Astronomy Misc | 4 | June 16th 04 05:44 PM |
Death to psychotronic weaponry (part 2) | Vierlingj | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 13th 04 05:44 PM |
Scientists Develop Cheap Method for Solar System Hunt | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | November 20th 03 03:55 PM |
Scientists Develop Cheap Method for Solar System Hunt | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | November 20th 03 03:55 PM |
Scientists Develop Cheap Method for Solar System Hunt (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 20th 03 06:53 AM |