A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Shuttle
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cronkite Has Lost It



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old September 12th 03, 04:47 PM
James Oberg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cronkite Has Lost It

Cronkite (Sept 6): "NASA 'Delusion' Hits White House, Pentagon"

JimO adds: Cronkite's ravings might have more 'gravitas' if he got the name
of NASA's Adminstrator correct. O'Keefe, not O'Neill.

http://interestalert.com/brand/sitei...02aaa031fa.alb
u&Sys=print&Fid=OPINIONS&Type=News&Filter=Opinions &S=siteia

Saturday, September 6, 2003

NASA 'Delusion' Hits White House, Pentagon


By Walter Cronkite
For the Journal


There were two news reports issued recently that, while quite different
in their subjects, make up a critical lesson for our times.

One report was from the Congressional Budget Office, which estimates
that, contrary to President Bush's assurances, the present budget deficit
will not level off at some $475 billion next year and then decline rapidly.
On the contrary, it might soar to a high of $5.8 trillion by 2013 if all of
Bush's tax cuts and other programs are enacted. And this doesn't count the
tens or even hundreds of billions of dollars we're now told the
reconstruction of Iraq will cost.

On the same day, we saw the report of the independent Columbia Accident
Investigation Board that described NASA as a "deluded agency" with a safety
culture "broken" by complacency and the need to stay on schedule and on
budget (a task President Bush had given to his appointee, NASA Administrator
Sean O'Neill).

The report found that NASA had become complacent, and schedule- and
budget-obsessed, and had not learned the lessons of the Challenger disaster
17 years ago. The budget pressures can be laid at the doors of various
presidents who, through the years, persuaded Congress to pinch NASA's budget
from a high (in 2002 dollars) of $25 billion in 1965 to $15 billion today.

These two reports tell a story that I can only call a flaw in our
national character: Our unspoken belief that we can have our cake and eat
it, too. Yes, we want a space program, but no, we don't want to go on paying
all that money for it.

The NASA that won the space race with the Russians, that put men on the
moon, landers on Mars and launched flybys of the outer planets, was, in
character and attitude, a military culture.

Not only did its astronauts come from the Navy and Air Force, but the
priorities of its managers were those of generals on the battlefield- of
good generals, anyway. Mission success and limiting losses were everything.
Since then, with NASA the imperative of mission success has been diluted by
cost effectiveness and schedule deadlines.

Space flight and military campaigns are unavoidably risky affairs in
which it is imperative that those responsible eliminate avoidable risks due
to haste, poor planning or funding inadequate to the task.

NASA is not the only "delusional agency" in Washington, as we've been
learning from the appalling mess in Iraq. The White House and the Pentagon
both qualify.

The estimated $475 billion at which the deficit is supposed to peak next
year does not include that terribly underestimated cost of pacifying and
rebuilding Iraq.

While NASA was making dangerous haste in meeting its underfunded shuttle
schedule, the Pentagon was preparing its "blitzkrieg-lite" for Iraq.

We cheered the plan's success in achieving an astonishingly quick
military victory. But the plan has proved inadequate in victory's aftermath
and is bleeding our troops and our treasury. Yes, indeed, there has been a
lot of delusion on display in Washington.

So what lessons do we draw from all this? No doubt there are many, but
the bottom line is to be found in the bottom line of our nation's financial
situation.

President Bush has dumped the Republicans' long-held claim that they are
the party of fiscal responsibility. With his tax cuts and Iraq policy (lest
we forget, both of which were agreed to by a goodly number of Democrats in
Congress), he is pushing the country deep into the hole.

We must face the fact that some of our proudest achievements and most
serious commitments- such as our leadership in space and our international
responsibilities on Earth- might have to be severely curtailed just to pay
our government's daily bills.

We are choking on the cake we have eaten.





----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Write to Walter Cronkite c/o King Features Syndicate, 888 Seventh Ave., New
York, NY 10019. E-mail: . Copyright, Walter Cronkite

Copyright © 2003 ABQJournal



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lost in Space: NASA Badly Needs a Mission That's Worth Dying For Scott M. Kozel Space Shuttle 16 September 10th 03 10:32 AM
Did challengers standdown uncover other lost vehicle issues? Hallerb Space Shuttle 0 July 28th 03 01:10 PM
If ISS were lost today Hallerb Space Shuttle 4 July 23rd 03 01:16 PM
Will more shuttles be lost? edward ohare Space Shuttle 4 July 16th 03 12:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.