![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone else have difficulty with pictures of planets appearing in
"reverse relief"? For example, in the December issue of S&T (page 22, the photo on left) craters and gullies appear to be mounds instead of depressions. Sometimes I can rotate the photo and get the image to "flip" and appear correctly. For me this seems to happen mostly on photos of Mars. The moon photos on pages 71 and 72 appear correctly. Can anyone explain this? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Will Parr wrote:
Does anyone else have difficulty with pictures of planets appearing in "reverse relief"? For example, in the December issue of S&T (page 22, the photo on left) craters and gullies appear to be mounds instead of depressions. Sometimes I can rotate the photo and get the image to "flip" and appear correctly. For me this seems to happen mostly on photos of Mars. The moon photos on pages 71 and 72 appear correctly. Can anyone explain this? It is a common effect. It happens most often when the scene is lit from "underneath." For scenes that are mostly flat surfaces with a bit of surface relief, an overlit surface looks the same as an underlit surface that is the same, except that hills and valleys are reversed. Since most scenes in our usual environment are lit from above, a scene that is lit from underneath can easily confuse us. Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Brian Tung wrote: Will Parr wrote: Does anyone else have difficulty with pictures of planets appearing in "reverse relief"? For example, in the December issue of S&T (page 22, the photo on left) craters and gullies appear to be mounds instead of depressions. Sometimes I can rotate the photo and get the image to "flip" and appear correctly. For me this seems to happen mostly on photos of Mars. The moon photos on pages 71 and 72 appear correctly. Can anyone explain this? It is a common effect. It happens most often when the scene is lit from "underneath." For scenes that are mostly flat surfaces with a bit of surface relief, an overlit surface looks the same as an underlit surface that is the same, except that hills and valleys are reversed. Since most scenes in our usual environment are lit from above, a scene that is lit from underneath can easily confuse us. Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt Is this something that can occur on a large scale. Like while you are flying a plane? Steve |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Sherman wrote:
Is this something that can occur on a large scale. Like while you are flying a plane? It can, at extreme lighting angles, when the view is dim. At dusk or dawn, if you view the terrain with the Sun illuminating the ground from behind your vantage point, you can sometimes see the effect. However, if the Sun is too bright, there are too many other visual cues and you won't see the effect. Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
16-17mm eyepiece, with eye relief? | Larry Stedman | Amateur Astronomy | 14 | July 8th 04 11:26 PM |
Eye relief on Nagler eyepieces | Tom Royer | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | April 1st 04 11:47 PM |
Eyepiece with good eye relief? | Malcolm Stewart | UK Astronomy | 3 | February 3rd 04 01:19 AM |
NASA Light-Emitting Diode Technology Brings Relief In Clinical Trials | Ron Baalke | Technology | 0 | November 14th 03 12:38 AM |