![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So you've all probably read that the latest Mach10 flight was
successful. The statements from NASA's O'Keefe seem to indicate that this technology will be used to advance commercial flight, as well as cheaper access to space. So in light of these post-Nov16 statements from NASA, will there be a future for scram? Some of you have said it's easier to get into space with a rocket, but some of the news coverage I was reading said scram could at least be used for a lower-stage booster. Could scram be suitable for heavy payloads in particular? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Success of the 1,688th launch of Soyuz | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 26th 04 03:22 PM |
Atlas Consecutive Success Claim | ed kyle | Policy | 4 | February 8th 04 12:46 AM |
Success of the 1685th Launch of Soyuz | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 2 | February 1st 04 05:44 AM |
Congratulations to NASA: Beagle 2 Team Still Hopes To Repeat MarsLanding Success (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 4th 04 06:45 PM |
localizing gamma ray bursts via interplanetary-spacecraft | Craig Markwardt | Astronomy Misc | 1 | July 16th 03 10:02 AM |