![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Back when Alan French asked for views at different apertures I started
thinking about selecting a short list of objects along with a list of apertures for use in creating such a set of sketches. Buried somewhere I have a set of (rough) Saturn sketches that were made with a variety of apertures; but I have no equivalent set for DSOs. Tonight I went out with Little-Red-Riding-Scope stopped down to a 2-inch aperture. After viewing a variety of DSOs at 11x I decided to scrap the project -- at least from a deep-sky point of view. I viewed M45, M31-32-110, M81-82, M57, M27, Albireo, M33, the Perseus Double Cluster, NGC 752, M36, M37, M38 and M1. I took no charts out with me, so I had to stick with objects I could find without charts. The last object (M1) was no more than 20 degrees above my horizon at the time of observation. In this age of widespread air pollution, light pollution, and light trespass I'm fortunate to have a pretty good backyard sky. Tonight's observations were made within 50 feet of my back door. The walls of my open-air observatory (the "Colosseum") blocked light trespass from my nearest neighbors. M31, the double cluster, M45, and M33 showed up quite nicely. The rest of the list would have benefitted from additional magnification, particularly M57 and M32. The recent thread on the Crab Nebula combined with tonight's observations got me thinking: What point is there to sketching deepsky objects at 2-inch, 3-inch, 4.5-inch, etc. apertures when sky conditions can make one person's 2-inch views superior to another person's 8-inch views? Seriously, I think it would be a disservice particularly to newbies who have no idea how good (or more likely, how bad) their skies really are. Let's face reality. Most people, amateur astronomers included, live in cities. My views from rural Montana are obsolete, outdated, unrealistic. They no longer reflect what most others might expect to see. So I gave up. Amateur astronomy has changed. Books and magazines concentrate more on urban astronomy and less on dark sky astronomy. My sky and I are headed for the same fate as the dinosaurs. It's time for a new generation of amateurs to define the hobby in their terms. The old ways are obsolete. Sketcher To sketch is to see. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
second scope - which one? Orion ShortTube 4.5 EQ or SkyQuest XT 4.5 | Jim Fedina | Amateur Astronomy | 15 | November 16th 04 01:41 PM |
**A FINE SEPTEMBER NIGHT (Sept. 9th) | David Knisely | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | September 26th 04 08:30 AM |
telescope newby question 101 | troll hunter | UK Astronomy | 12 | May 21st 04 09:23 PM |
Small scope Saturn | Pete Lawrence | Amateur Astronomy | 22 | December 18th 03 10:05 AM |
SMALL SCOPE + NICE BACKYARD = ENJOYABLE NIGHT! | David Knisely | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | October 27th 03 09:55 AM |