![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I get tired of reading relativistic projections of costs where someone
will take the costs of training and putting just one or two, or three or four, astronauts or cosmonauts into space per year and project precisely those same costs to mass transportation of thousands to millions into space. Everything concerning putting one or two, or three or four, astronauts or cosmonauts into space is individually planned and tooled, literally handcrafted, for each specific mission. The cost of handcrafting from the bottom-up, per micro-managed top-down planning, precise specifications and precise controls, for every single one or two, or three or four, humans, and the one lift and mission, will always be at least thousands of times greater than mass production costs no matter what the type vehicle or propulsion system involved. Under such a system, real advancement, and real lowering of costs, will be on a time scale that type of system has always followed, that of one advancement in a hundred, to one advancement in a thousand, years. Brad |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
cheap access to space - majority opinion | Cameron Dorrough | Technology | 15 | June 27th 04 03:35 AM |
Bechtel Nevada: Control of the World's Largest Nuclear Weapons Facilities | * | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 2nd 04 05:29 PM |
RTF safety costs 700 million | bob haller | Space Shuttle | 3 | April 4th 04 04:31 PM |
Heavy Lift launcher is allready here | serge | Policy | 27 | February 13th 04 06:03 PM |
Earth's birth date turned back: Formed earlier than believed (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 17th 03 11:28 PM |