![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
I'm just starting out on the imaging front, and I'm very happy with RegiStax for processing planetary and lunar images. However, I'm really interested in imaging DSOs, and RegiStax doesn't seem to cut it in that department. At the moment, I'm limited to 15-second exposures which, if I understand correctly, need to be stacked differently in order to combine such faint images into something brighter. I've downloaded evaluation versions of Images Plus and Registar, but haven't had much luck with them. Images Plus tends to hang if I open more than a few large images at once, and Registar doesn't seem to want to register/align my rather noisy images. It gives me the feeling I'm doing something fundamentally wrong, as I've heard many good things about these products - if this is the case any pointers would be appreciated! I have a 2Ghz, 512Mb PC with both Windows XP and Linux on it, which I figured should be adequate, even if it's not super fast when it comes to this kind of application. I also have a dual processor Linux box, so something that would run on that would be ideal. Maybe some kind of plugin for the Gimp or something? So, basically, I was wondering what the rest of you use and/or recommend for aligning/stacking this sort of images. I already have plenty of tools for processing the resulting combined image, so I can do without those particular features. Cheers, Steve |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So, basically, I was wondering what the rest of you use and/or
recommend for aligning/stacking this sort of images. I already have plenty of tools for processing the resulting combined image, so I can do without those particular features. Hi: I don't do a whole lot of deep sky work, being mainly a planetary imager. But Registax has worked fine for me for the deep sky images I've taken of late. I suggest you might give it another try. If you want something else, take a look at Stellar Magic: http://home.att.net/~laser_diagnostics/newfile.html, which is free and effective. Then there's Iris http://www.astrosurf.com/buil/us/iris/iris.htm which is HIGHLY effective, but with a somewhat steep learning curve. Finally, another excellent choice is K3CCD Tools: http://www.pk3.org/Astro/, which is highly capable and easy to learn and use. Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers! Goto http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rod Mollise wrote:
So, basically, I was wondering what the rest of you use and/or recommend for aligning/stacking this sort of images. I already have plenty of tools for processing the resulting combined image, so I can do without those particular features. Hi: I don't do a whole lot of deep sky work, being mainly a planetary imager. But Registax has worked fine for me for the deep sky images I've taken of late. I suggest you might give it another try. Hi Rod, Whilst Registax works fine for the brighter objects, I'm after something that will stack some rather faint, short exposures into something resembling one longer exposure. Unless I'm missing an option somewhere, Registax only has one stacking algorithm which appears to be based on some sort of averaging function. I checked out the other programs you linked to, and they look like they'll do what I'm after. Given our weather at the moment, I should at least have plenty of time to try them out! Thanks, Steve |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rod Mollise" wrote
So, basically, I was wondering what the rest of you use and/or recommend for aligning/stacking this sort of images..... ......... Then there's Iris http://www.astrosurf.com/buil/us/iris/iris.htm which is HIGHLY effective, but with a somewhat steep learning curve. Guys, I've used IRIS for around 5 years and find it one of the best deep sky CCD image processing programs. It has features that can't be found in other programs. I've used CCDsoft and MaxIm, but I really like IRIS. One of the reasons it's difficult to learn is that it is so powerful. And Besides, the price is right! ![]() I also use AIP4WIN, mostly for color combine processing. AIP4WIN came with an excellent book on image processing. It is currently out-of-print, but a 2nd edition is due out shortly. I did see a copy of the old book/program on the shelf at High Point Scientific about two weeks ago. See: http://www.willbell.com/aip/index.htm Since you run Linux you might want to use the completely free program IRAF. This is the program used by most professional astronomers and it has a reputation for being difficult to learn and use. But, again, the price is right! Link: http://iraf.noao.edu/ George Normandin |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mac OS X Image Stacking/Processing Softwa Lynkeos 0.4 FREEWARE | Larry Stedman | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 1st 04 10:16 PM |
[OT] Ever Wonder What Tim Berners-Lee Uses? | Gareth Slee | Amateur Astronomy | 20 | October 1st 03 10:18 PM |
Mac image stacking software | Juan Hobenaro | Amateur Astronomy | 14 | October 1st 03 07:52 AM |
U. at Buffalo Engineer Creates Software to Detect and Find Leaksin ISS (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Space Station | 3 | September 8th 03 10:28 PM |