![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone have any updated information from the experiments in Europe
that seemed to suggest that they had been able to transmit information faster then the speed of light. I believe that it was in Germany and that they had encoded music into the test stream and were able to decode it at the receiver. Was that a case of misreading the results or did it actually happen? If it did happen, would a transmission of that type be detectable over a long distance? -- Ed http://www.geeks.org/~ed/Usenet_Servers.html strip to reply |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ed" wrote in message . 246... Does anyone have any updated information from the experiments in Europe that seemed to suggest that they had been able to transmit information faster then the speed of light. I believe that it was in Germany and that they had encoded music into the test stream and were able to decode it at the receiver. Was that a case of misreading the results or did it actually happen? If it did happen, would a transmission of that type be detectable over a long distance? -- Ed http://www.geeks.org/~ed/Usenet_Servers.html strip to reply That sounds like old news Ed. I remember there was a German researcher doing that lind of stuff maybe a few years ago (he may have improved his experiment, but...). At that time, while he seemed to be transmitting music "information" faster than c, the general consensus was (still is) that it is really not, the explanation lying in the exact technical definition of info, and his music signal essentially not being the entire signal curve or waveform (this is a vast simplification and I was never a real expert on this stuff.) Just did a quick google search on web sites with "ftl experiment" and found one particular reference with other references. see: http://www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de/~mpoes...k/FTL/tunnelin gftl.html The following is a quote from there on the type of experiment I remember (and which others have also done.) "So, has special relativity been disproved, now that FTL speeds have been measured? The first problem with this naive conclusion is that, while in special relativity neither information nor energy are allowed to be transmitted faster than light, but that certain velocities in connection with the phenomena of wave transmission may well excede light speed. For instance, the phase velocity of a wave or the group velocity of a wave packet are not in principle restricted below light speed. The speed connected with wave phenomena that, according to special relativity, must never exceed light speed, is the front velocity of the wave or wave packet, which roughly can be seen as the speed of the first little stirring that tells an observer "Hey, there's a wave coming". Detailled examinations of the differences between the velocities useful to describe waves can be found in the classic book Brillouin, L. 1960 Wave Propagation and Group Velocity. NY: Academic Press." Actually, discussions of this sort of expt. are still always found on the sci.physics newsgroup (usenet.) They usually end up with those insisting the expt. works being called "cranks" or "trolls" by the real physicists there. ![]() Cheers, ...tonyC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Tired" light | Marcel Luttgens | Astronomy Misc | 107 | December 21st 04 07:20 AM |
All technology outdated | betalimit | Policy | 0 | September 20th 04 03:41 PM |
Isn't the expansion of space faster than the speed of light? | ROM SPACE KNIGHT NURSE | Amateur Astronomy | 23 | September 5th 04 06:59 PM |
NASA Test of Light Speed Extrapolation | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 26 | February 12th 04 02:29 PM |
Correlation between CMBR and Redshift Anisotropies. | The Ghost In The Machine | Astronomy Misc | 172 | August 30th 03 10:27 PM |