![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was reading that NASA will be scrapping its Scramjet research
program after the next X43 test: http://www.e4engineering.com/story.a...d-a7bd9b6a4258 Is scram considered to be the weakest of the available technologies to get into orbit? I'd thought that this particular technology was supposed to be the most promising for usage by the commercial mainstream for rapid intercontinental transit, as well as high-speed intercontinental bombers and cruise missiles. Maybe NASA should sell its technology to Richard Branson, if nobody else will pursue it. It seems a shame to waste it. Or will the military take up the mantle? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Scram uses? | Brian Gaff | Space Shuttle | 69 | April 19th 04 09:51 PM |
Scram uses? | Jake McGuire | Technology | 8 | April 19th 04 01:39 AM |
Scram uses? | Jake McGuire | Policy | 7 | April 10th 04 01:55 AM |
Scram uses? | Andrew Higgins | Technology | 0 | April 3rd 04 10:59 PM |
Scram uses? | Andrew Higgins | Policy | 0 | April 3rd 04 10:59 PM |