![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Which eyepiece would you consider to be the "sleeper" in your
collection (i.e. the one that doesn't retail for much money but is one heck of a performer)? I think the Antares W70 8.6mm is mine. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Oct 2004 10:42:40 -0700, BigKhat wrote:
Which eyepiece would you consider to be the "sleeper" in your collection (i.e. the one that doesn't retail for much money but is one heck of a performer)? I think the Antares W70 8.6mm is mine. 9mm UltraWide from ScopeStuff. . .it is the best value out there. -- Martin "Photographs From the Universe of Amateur Astronomy" http://home.earthlink.net/~martinhowell |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I think the Antares W70 8.6mm is mine. 9mm UltraWide from ScopeStuff. . .it is the best value out there. Mine: 9mm Ultrawide from Adorama. Wide field of view and quite sharp to the edge even in a fast scope. Some users seem to have diffculties with black out, I don't. According to a post here a while back by Jim Henson of Scopestuff, the 66 degree Ultrawide and the W-70 have the same optical specs. jon |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BigKhat" wrote in message m... Which eyepiece would you consider to be the "sleeper" in your collection (i.e. the one that doesn't retail for much money but is one heck of a performer)? I think the Antares W70 8.6mm is mine. The University Optics orthoscopic, in either the original or HD version. I tested them both against some very big name planetary eyepieces a couple of months ago and found them to have only a tiny amount more flare, with comparable resolution and contrast--at 1/3 to 1/4 the price. Their barlow is also very highly rated, but it's closer in price to the bigger names. Bob |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Schmall" wrote in message ... "BigKhat" wrote in message m... Which eyepiece would you consider to be the "sleeper" in your collection (i.e. the one that doesn't retail for much money but is one heck of a performer)? I think the Antares W70 8.6mm is mine. The University Optics orthoscopic, in either the original or HD version. I tested them both against some very big name planetary eyepieces a couple of months ago and found them to have only a tiny amount more flare, with comparable resolution and contrast--at 1/3 to 1/4 the price. Their barlow is also very highly rated, but it's closer in price to the bigger names. Bob Ditto. Best bang for the buck out there. Tom |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like my UO 16mm Koenig but I think it favours the longer focal length
scopes.(f8? and higher) Best regards, Bill "BigKhat" wrote in message m... Which eyepiece would you consider to be the "sleeper" in your collection (i.e. the one that doesn't retail for much money but is one heck of a performer)? I think the Antares W70 8.6mm is mine. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Becker" wrote in message ... I like my UO 16mm Koenig but I think it favours the longer focal length scopes.(f8? and higher) Best regards, Bill Or, on the other hand, I'll take my 16.3mm Telescopics Galoc in a heartbeat in that range... The on-axis images are simply stunning... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:40:57 -0700, "Jan Owen"
wrote: "Bill Becker" wrote in message ... I like my UO 16mm Koenig but I think it favours the longer focal length scopes.(f8? and higher) Best regards, Bill Or, on the other hand, I'll take my 16.3mm Telescopics Galoc in a heartbeat in that range... The on-axis images are simply stunning... 12mm Brandon, circa 1985-ish. Owned a Pentax SMC orth 12mm and this thing beat it on the Moon. So I kept it. Ever notice how in each eyepiece line, there seems to be a "ringer" at some particular f.l.? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Which eyepiece would you consider to be the "sleeper" in your
collection (i.e. the one that doesn't retail for much money but is one heck of a performer)? I think the Antares W70 8.6mm is mine. Hi: Well, it's in a whole other price category from some that have been mentioned...but the TV 27 Panoptic is cheaper than quite a few of the new ones, and...well...I've just never seen a better eyepiece in this focal length. Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers! Goto http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
my TMB monos!
BigKhat wrote: Which eyepiece would you consider to be the "sleeper" in your collection (i.e. the one that doesn't retail for much money but is one heck of a performer)? I think the Antares W70 8.6mm is mine. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FOV and f ratio | Matt St. Helens | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | October 3rd 04 02:59 AM |
AFOV (Apparent Field of View) | Sean O'Dwyer | Misc | 4 | July 7th 04 04:10 AM |
AFOV | Mike Thomas | Amateur Astronomy | 20 | July 1st 04 04:59 PM |
Bands of Saturn. How many of them can be counted (really!) with 7" scope? | ValeryD | Amateur Astronomy | 294 | January 26th 04 08:18 PM |
*Review: Astrosystems 30mm WIDE SCAN III Eyepiece | David Knisely | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | August 8th 03 05:53 AM |