So does anyone know what the cover up is about...

That John Maxson is selling in his book? There is no way I'm paying $36 for
this bit of fiction...

"Skippy" wrote in message
...
That John Maxson is selling in his book? There is no way I'm paying $36
for
this bit of fiction...



If he genuinely wanted to expose what he believes happened - he could do it
all on his website - and include annotated videos, high res images etc etc.

That he chooses not to explains his primary motive is attempting (and one
presumes failing ) to make money -NOT to highlight some bull**** story

Doug

"Skippy" wrote in message
...
That John Maxson is selling in his book? There is no way I'm paying $36
for
this bit of fiction...

I asked the same question a while back. I got no answers from the man
himself, and some inputs from people who have read the book. Here's the
whole thread:

http://tinyurl.com/kycn

Like most conspiracies, the motive for a "cover-up" is apparently a
convoluted, swiss-cheese-like mess based on dozens of bad assumptions,
propped up on poor reasoning, and duct-taped together with melodramatic
rantings couched in emotional language. I base this "libel and defamation"
on the second-hand evidence of others, because (as usual) the author didn't
explain himself. Not even a tiny bit.

"Terrence Daniels" wrote:

Like most conspiracies, the motive for a "cover-up" is apparently a
convoluted, swiss-cheese-like mess based on dozens of bad assumptions,
propped up on poor reasoning, and duct-taped together with melodramatic
rantings couched in emotional language. I base this "libel and defamation"
on the second-hand evidence of others, because (as usual) the author
didn't
explain himself. Not even a tiny bit.

Why don't we focus on the first hand evidence? No one here has any first
hand evidence Terrence and we are not going to get any without help from
someone more powerful than us. The first hand evidence, some it which is
splattered, damaged, and cut to fit, is buried in a long abandoned missile
silo in Florida; some is sitting in a repository somewhere near Houston
Texas; still other evidence lies on the bottom of the Atlantic ocean or in
solid waste landfills in Alabama and Utah. I heard but can't verify that
some of it may be sitting in a locker in southern California. It's kind of
spread out around the country.

If you wish to make your decisions based on second hand evidence, that's
okay by me, more power to you. I prefer as much as possible to obtain first
hand evidence. Some of what I have seen and you will soon have opportunity
to see is first hand evidence, but not perhaps in the sense one might
normally think about first hand evidence.

--

Daniel
Mount Charleston, not Charleston, SC

Being tired of lurking, on Sat, 23 Aug 2003 12:19:07 -0700, Charleston
posted:

"Terrence Daniels" wrote:

Like most conspiracies, the motive for a "cover-up" is apparently a
convoluted, swiss-cheese-like mess based on dozens of bad assumptions,
propped up on poor reasoning, and duct-taped together with melodramatic
rantings couched in emotional language. I base this "libel and defamation"
on the second-hand evidence of others, because (as usual) the author
didn't
explain himself. Not even a tiny bit.

Why don't we focus on the first hand evidence? No one here has any first
hand evidence Terrence and we are not going to get any without help from
someone more powerful than us. The first hand evidence, some it which is
splattered, damaged, and cut to fit, is buried in a long abandoned missile
silo in Florida; some is sitting in a repository somewhere near Houston
Texas; still other evidence lies on the bottom of the Atlantic ocean or in
solid waste landfills in Alabama and Utah. I heard but can't verify that
some of it may be sitting in a locker in southern California. It's kind of
spread out around the country.

If you wish to make your decisions based on second hand evidence, that's
okay by me, more power to you. I prefer as much as possible to obtain first
hand evidence. Some of what I have seen and you will soon have opportunity
to see is first hand evidence, but not perhaps in the sense one might
normally think about first hand evidence.

Frist hand evidence: I saw it from somebody who heard it.


--
Dr. Flonkenstein
Alcatroll Labs Inc. Flame, troll and
(TINAL) antispaem bots
development.

mhm 27x12 MEOW MEOW ARMY (TINMMA)
ICQ 2^4*3*13*234461

TNPJRL # -1
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll
Highpriest of the Romath Religion (TINRR)
Professor Kookology at BUNGMUNCH Univ. (TINBU)
Flonk leader #19
Wereldsman's hate lits #7

In article N6P1b.16739$cj1.5453@fed1read06,
"Charleston" wrote:

"Terrence Daniels" wrote:

Like most conspiracies, the motive for a "cover-up" is apparently a
convoluted, swiss-cheese-like mess based on dozens of bad assumptions,
propped up on poor reasoning, and duct-taped together with melodramatic
rantings couched in emotional language. I base this "libel and defamation"
on the second-hand evidence of others, because (as usual) the author
didn't
explain himself. Not even a tiny bit.

Why don't we focus on the first hand evidence? No one here has any first
hand evidence Terrence and we are not going to get any without help from
someone more powerful than us. The first hand evidence, some it which is
splattered, damaged, and cut to fit, is buried in a long abandoned missile
silo in Florida; some is sitting in a repository somewhere near Houston
Texas; still other evidence lies on the bottom of the Atlantic ocean or in
solid waste landfills in Alabama and Utah. I heard but can't verify that
some of it may be sitting in a locker in southern California. It's kind of
spread out around the country.

If you wish to make your decisions based on second hand evidence, that's
okay by me, more power to you. I prefer as much as possible to obtain first
hand evidence. Some of what I have seen and you will soon have opportunity
to see is first hand evidence, but not perhaps in the sense one might
normally think about first hand evidence.

Riiiiiiiight. Sure, Daniel. Whatever you say . . .

Put up or shut up.

--
Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D.
Reformed Aerospace Engineer
"Heisenberg might have been here."
~ Anonymous

Thanks!


"Terrence Daniels" wrote in
message k.net...
"Skippy" wrote in message
...
That John Maxson is selling in his book? There is no way I'm paying $36
for
this bit of fiction...

I asked the same question a while back. I got no answers from the man
himself, and some inputs from people who have read the book. Here's the
whole thread:

http://tinyurl.com/kycn

Like most conspiracies, the motive for a "cover-up" is apparently a
convoluted, swiss-cheese-like mess based on dozens of bad assumptions,
propped up on poor reasoning, and duct-taped together with melodramatic
rantings couched in emotional language. I base this "libel and defamation"
on the second-hand evidence of others, because (as usual) the author
didn't
explain himself. Not even a tiny bit.