What Motivates Balettie to Maintain His Libel?

Any deep-thinking shuttle engineer in this group (and I know
it claims to have some) should want to answer the subject
question, given any ethical or objective concern whatsoever.

If this damaging libel is representative of the moral fiber to be
found in JSC's Mission Control, why does Oberg defend it?

=========================================
"Chuck Stewart" wrote in message
...
John Maxson wrote:

At no point does The Betrayal of Mission 51-L state that
cryogenic cold-soaking of Challenger's left SRB caused
it to burn through, as Roger Balettie has falsely alleged
on the internet.
At no point does The Betrayal of Mission 51-L give the
reader the impression that a left-SRB burnthrough led to
a fracture in the ET at launch (and a pad fire), as Roger
Balettie has falsely claimed on the internet.

While technically true, and needing some correction,
=========================================

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)