A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why is the White Knight required?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old October 18th 04, 01:23 PM
Chris Gunn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why is the White Knight required?


SS1 gets dropped from 47,000 ft.

From there it has enough gas to get to... 115km or so, which is to say
around 100km higher.

This suggests then the White knight trip is not used for a bit of
extra altitude. So what is it for?

To reduce under carriage requirements for horizontal TO?
To avoid some kind of problem with vert TO?
To avoid high MACH low altitude aerodynamic requirements, if full
rocket is used from sea leavel, and a slow initial climb would require
too much fuel?


Please enlighten me!


Gunn
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SpaceshipOne/ White Knight models Pat Flannery Space Shuttle 2 June 9th 04 08:09 PM
SpaceshipOne/ White Knight models Pat Flannery Policy 3 June 9th 04 08:09 PM
Rutans White Knight as IR observatory Carsten Nielsen Technology 7 February 29th 04 03:13 AM
white knight: air-launched sst gg Technology 4 December 15th 03 11:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.