![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() SS1 gets dropped from 47,000 ft. From there it has enough gas to get to... 115km or so, which is to say around 100km higher. This suggests then the White knight trip is not used for a bit of extra altitude. So what is it for? To reduce under carriage requirements for horizontal TO? To avoid some kind of problem with vert TO? To avoid high MACH low altitude aerodynamic requirements, if full rocket is used from sea leavel, and a slow initial climb would require too much fuel? Please enlighten me! Gunn |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SpaceshipOne/ White Knight models | Pat Flannery | Space Shuttle | 2 | June 9th 04 08:09 PM |
SpaceshipOne/ White Knight models | Pat Flannery | Policy | 3 | June 9th 04 08:09 PM |
Rutans White Knight as IR observatory | Carsten Nielsen | Technology | 7 | February 29th 04 03:13 AM |
white knight: air-launched sst | gg | Technology | 4 | December 15th 03 11:23 PM |