![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please, oh please don't take this as anything more than a passing thought.
I'm sure there's a major flaw in this suggestion that someone will point out and that's in part why I'm putting the idea out there. Light travels at a finite speed. When we look at a galaxy, we are seeing it at many different points in time, as the part of the galaxy that is closest to us can be millions of light years closer than the far end, thus the light from the far end takes millions more years to reach us. Basically what I am saying is, in *some* cases, could the reason that some galaxies appear to have spiral arms be because they are rotating, and the length of the arm is thousands of light years long, therefore the closest part will appear farthest in the direction of rotation and the farther back the arm you go, the farther back in time you go causing it to look like a spiral arm? Whew....I hope somebody understands that..... - Jeff http://www.planetary.org $30 a year and you're part of the team sending the first solar sail into space...... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message yzD5d.158175$XP3.131357@edtnps84, Jeff Hammersmark
writes Please, oh please don't take this as anything more than a passing thought. I'm sure there's a major flaw in this suggestion that someone will point out and that's in part why I'm putting the idea out there. Light travels at a finite speed. When we look at a galaxy, we are seeing it at many different points in time, as the part of the galaxy that is closest to us can be millions of light years closer than the far end, thus the light from the far end takes millions more years to reach us. Basically what I am saying is, in *some* cases, could the reason that some galaxies appear to have spiral arms be because they are rotating, and the length of the arm is thousands of light years long, therefore the closest part will appear farthest in the direction of rotation and the farther back the arm you go, the farther back in time you go causing it to look like a spiral arm? No, because we see galaxies face on and they show spiral arms - that's when they are best seen. Galaxies are a few thousand (not million) light years across. Spiral arms are an illusion in the sense that they aren't permanent things that go round a galaxy, but they aren't that sort of illusion. -- What have they got to hide? Release the ESA Beagle 2 report. Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I realize that spiral arms really do exist and I know that galxies that we
see face on prove it, I was just thinking of a situation where it isn't face on - more at an angle. Could this situation create an illusion of spiral arms or a spiral pattern which isn't actually there? Also, galaxies are of course not millions of light years across (I guess I was confusing that with light years away) but if you want to get technical, they are usually more than just a few thousand light years across - Tens to hundreds of thousands would probably be a more accurate description of their sizes. "Jonathan Silverlight" wrote in message ... In message yzD5d.158175$XP3.131357@edtnps84, Jeff Hammersmark writes Please, oh please don't take this as anything more than a passing thought. I'm sure there's a major flaw in this suggestion that someone will point out and that's in part why I'm putting the idea out there. Light travels at a finite speed. When we look at a galaxy, we are seeing it at many different points in time, as the part of the galaxy that is closest to us can be millions of light years closer than the far end, thus the light from the far end takes millions more years to reach us. Basically what I am saying is, in *some* cases, could the reason that some galaxies appear to have spiral arms be because they are rotating, and the length of the arm is thousands of light years long, therefore the closest part will appear farthest in the direction of rotation and the farther back the arm you go, the farther back in time you go causing it to look like a spiral arm? No, because we see galaxies face on and they show spiral arms - that's when they are best seen. Galaxies are a few thousand (not million) light years across. Spiral arms are an illusion in the sense that they aren't permanent things that go round a galaxy, but they aren't that sort of illusion. -- What have they got to hide? Release the ESA Beagle 2 report. Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff Hammersmark wrote:
Light travels at a finite speed. When we look at a galaxy, we are seeing it at many different points in time, as the part of the galaxy that is closest to us can be millions of light years closer than the far end, thus the light from the far end takes millions more years to reach us. Basically what I am saying is, in *some* cases, could the reason that some galaxies appear to have spiral arms be because they are rotating, and the length of the arm is thousands of light years long, therefore the closest part will appear farthest in the direction of rotation and the farther back the arm you go, the farther back in time you go causing it to look like a spiral arm? For features to change their apparent shape because of the time-lag between the arrival of the light from the 'foreground' parts of the galaxy and the 'background', they'd have to be moving extremely fast -- a substantial fraction of c -- which doesn't agree with other observations, like the red- (or blue-) shift variation from one side to the other. Our models of galactic motion already have trouble explaining how galaxies manage to hold together with rotational periods in the hundreds of millions of years (hence the posited "dark matter" to give them more gravity); the discrepancy would be that much worse if their rate of rotation were orders of magnitude faster. Moreover most spiral galaxies' arms can be seen to 'wrap' all the way around the hub, or even several times around, which I don't think can be reconciled with a time-lag explanation. Finally, we see plenty of spirals 'face-on' or nearly so, in which case all the light we see must have been emitted at about the same time, give or take a few thousand years. -- Odysseus |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff Hammersmark" wrote in message news:ZME5d.116052$KU5.112508@edtnps89... I realize that spiral arms really do exist and I know that galxies that we see face on prove it, I was just thinking of a situation where it isn't face on - more at an angle. Could this situation create an illusion of spiral arms or a spiral pattern which isn't actually there? Jeff, For that to be the case, the radius of the galaxy (in light years) would have to be a fairly high proportion of the rotation period (in years). I'm not saying its impossible, but I'm not aware that there have been any such examples. For example, our Galaxy has a diameter of some 100,000 Ly, but its rotation period is something like 250 - 300 Million years. In the time that light takes to travel across the radius of the galaxy, the galaxy rotates something like one fiftieth of a degree. It would be an interesting exercise to work out the mass of the galaxy that would rotate with a period of (let us say) 1 million years. However, I don't expect we'll ever find any which are the size of the Galaxy, but can rotate so rapidly. It's a good question though - don't be afraid to ask more like that. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | September 9th 04 06:30 AM |
The Gravitational Instability Theory on the Formation of the Universe | Br Dan Izzo | Policy | 6 | September 7th 04 09:29 PM |
The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory | Br Dan Izzo | Astronomy Misc | 8 | September 7th 04 12:07 AM |
The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory | Br Dan Izzo | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 31st 04 02:35 AM |
Three Dusty Beauties: New Portraits of Spiral Galaxies NGC 613, NGC1792 and NGC 3627 (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 4 | January 27th 04 09:40 PM |