![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Terrence Daniels" wrote in
thlink.net: From: Michael Shaffer When do you guys think the shuttle will be back in action? I really miss seeing the launches. ![]() Me too. I get chills at SSME start. The ELV launches with the Mars rovers have been keeping me going, but I can't drive down to the local golf club and watch them go by like I can with the launches to the station. The current plan is for STS-114 to launch with Exp-9 on March 11, 2004. That's news to me, how confident are they of that date? So they can finish the re-work of the bipod area (already in work, I know), flight-qualify the bolt catcher assemblies, and whatever else the CAIB suggests, and be ready to go that soon? The bipod ramp fix might be ready by December. Pacing items appear to be RCC inspection and development of in-flight RCC inspection/repair capability. -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jorge R. Frank" wrote in message
... The bipod ramp fix might be ready by December. Pacing items appear to be RCC inspection and development of in-flight RCC inspection/repair capability. And they've already got a strategy in place for in-flight inspections, and they're testing the big "flashlight" in the pool, right? Will the new bipod design be for new hardware only, or can it be retro-fitted to already-manufactured tanks? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Terrence Daniels" wrote in
thlink.net: "Jorge R. Frank" wrote in message ... The bipod ramp fix might be ready by December. Pacing items appear to be RCC inspection and development of in-flight RCC inspection/repair capability. And they've already got a strategy in place for in-flight inspections, Dunno what you mean by "in-place", but NASA has been working on in-flight inspection since late February, and they've gotten to the point of starting serious hardware and procedures development. and they're testing the big "flashlight" in the pool, right? Flashlight? Haven't heard of that. Will the new bipod design be for new hardware only, or can it be retro-fitted to already-manufactured tanks? I believe the latter, but I'm not 100% sure. -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jorge R. Frank" wrote in message
... Dunno what you mean by "in-place", but NASA has been working on in-flight inspection since late February, and they've gotten to the point of starting serious hardware and procedures development. That's what I meant. They've been working on it for a while and they generally know what they're going to do about the issue. Flashlight? Haven't heard of that. I should have said "arm extension" but "flashlight" came to mind because that's how I thought of it, from the previous discussion on the subject... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Terrence Daniels" wrote in
arthlink.net: "Jorge R. Frank" wrote in message ... Flashlight? Haven't heard of that. I should have said "arm extension" but "flashlight" came to mind because that's how I thought of it, from the previous discussion on the subject... OK, gotcha. There are a number of boom concepts being compared. I expect a selection fairly soon (say August 1 or so). -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
NASA Team Believed Foam Could Not Damage Space Shuttle | Scott M. Kozel | Space Shuttle | 9 | July 25th 03 08:33 AM |
Space Shuttle Mission Management Team Transcripts Released | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 21st 03 11:19 PM |
Japanese Test Space Shuttle Crashes in Sweden | Rusty B | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 2nd 03 03:58 PM |
Columbia Accident Investigation Board Issues Preliminary Recommendation Four: Launch and Ascent Imaging | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 1st 03 06:45 PM |