9/11/01+3

Peter J Ross wrote:




You're certainly correct


Dale very often is, saucerhead. I can't quite work out why he's trying
to take your saucerhead screed seriously, but I had the same problem
with his replies to the Hillbilly troll. Personally I wish he wouldn't
do it. Leaving you and Racist Hammy and Nutty McNutt to babble
incoherently at each other while being ignored by the rest of the
world (except for an occasional poke with a sharp stick) would be a
much more amusing plan, in my opinion. Who knows what wonderful
delusions the three of you might come up with?

You've got a point. But - every now and then - blatant stupidity has to
be taken head-on, even if the opponent has a very small head. And there
are benefits: after this round with the idiot, I received an e-mail from
a stanger who had read the "debate' (if one can call a battle between a
Chrysler and a baby carriage a debate), and was interested in my sources
of information, because he was (he said) developing his poliical ideas
along the same lines. so, I suppose there is an informational side to
these - admittedly - near-to-worthless exchanges. I suppose we can't
assume that just because it is obvious to us that these little curd
piles aren't to be taken seriously, it is obvious to everyone.


Nevertheless, Dale is a good person, and you're just a saucerhead,
saucerhead, so it still sucks to be you, doesn't it?


Good? Possibly not. I just aim to be awake.

dmh

"Dale" wrote in message ...


Peter J Ross wrote:




You're certainly correct


Dale very often is, saucerhead. I can't quite work out why he's trying
to take your saucerhead screed seriously, but I had the same problem
with his replies to the Hillbilly troll. Personally I wish he wouldn't
do it. Leaving you and Racist Hammy and Nutty McNutt to babble
incoherently at each other while being ignored by the rest of the
world (except for an occasional poke with a sharp stick) would be a
much more amusing plan, in my opinion. Who knows what wonderful
delusions the three of you might come up with?

You've got a point. But - every now and then - blatant stupidity has to
be taken head-on, even if the opponent has a very small head. And there
are benefits: after this round with the idiot, I received an e-mail from
a stanger



who had read the "debate' (if one can call a battle between a
Chrysler and a baby carriage a debate), and was interested in my sources
of information,



because he was (he said) developing his political ideas
along the same lines. so, I suppose there is an informational side to
these - admittedly - near-to-worthless exchanges. I suppose we can't
assume that just because it is obvious to us that these little curd
piles aren't to be taken seriously, it is obvious to everyone.



"I NEVER told the buried gold
Upon the hill that lies,
I saw the sun, his plunder done,
Crouch low to guard his prize.

He stood as near, as stood you here,
A pace had been between
Did but a snake bisect the brake,
My life had forfeit been.

That was a wondrous booty,
I hope 't was honest gained
Those were the finest ingots
That ever kissed the spade.

Whether to keep the secret
Whether to reveal
Whether, while I ponder
Kidd may sudden sail

Could a Shrewd advise me
We might e'en divide
Should a Shrewd betray me
"Atropos" decide! "









Nevertheless, Dale is a good person, and you're just a saucerhead,
saucerhead, so it still sucks to be you, doesn't it?


Good? Possibly not. I just aim to be awake.

dmh