![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's really unbelievable that there are some 48,000 posts in SAA most of
which are pure garbage. Why can't any house cleaning be done? Luckily I can choose how many downloaded messages I get. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() CarboHolic wrote: It's really unbelievable that there are some 48,000 posts in SAA most of which are pure garbage. Why can't any house cleaning be done? Luckily I can choose how many downloaded messages I get. 48,001 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 17:35:40 GMT, "CarboHolic" wrote:
It's really unbelievable that there are some 48,000 posts in SAA most of which are pure garbage. Your post hasn't help the statistics, has it? Looking through the unfiltered messages in my newsreader, it appears that the vast majority are perfectly topical. I don't see much garbage at all, especially if you throw away the posts of just a handful of known trolls. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
CarboHolic:
It's really unbelievable that there are some 48,000 posts in SAA most of which are pure garbage. That's your opinion. I read every one of them every day, and I cherish them all. Why can't any house cleaning be done? No cyberdusters? Luckily I can choose how many downloaded messages I get. Oh. Then what's the problem? Do these 48,000 posts all exist on floppies at your house, and are you spending 24/7 popping in floppies as requests come in? Davoud -- usenet *at* davidillig dawt com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sounds like you don't understand the UseNet newsgroups.
There is no central location where these messages are kept so you have no single point that you can "repair" the newsgroup. In addition, this is a nonmoderated group so there is not anybody that can delete improper posts. As to the 48K posts, that is all that your newsgroup server has at the moment for the last x number of days in it's memory. There are a lot more than that that have been posted to the group over the many years that it has been around. -- Bob May Losing weight is easy! If you ever want to lose weight, eat and drink less. Works every time it is tried! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're right. A lotta' junk posts in here. Out you GO!
PLONK! -- Jan Owen To reach me directly, remove the Z, if one appears in my e-mail address... Latitude: 33.662 Longitude: -112.3272 "CarboHolic" wrote in message news:MRIZc.60609$jZ5.48134@clgrps13... It's really unbelievable that there are some 48,000 posts in SAA most of which are pure garbage. Why can't any house cleaning be done? Luckily I can choose how many downloaded messages I get. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message MRIZc.60609$jZ5.48134@clgrps13, CarboHolic
writes It's really unbelievable that there are some 48,000 posts in SAA most of which are pure garbage. I see fewer than 1000 posts in the past week, and mostly on topic. Although I suspect my news server of losing a few messages I doubt if it is all that wide of the mark. Your server may have a years worth of articles or be defective. Why can't any house cleaning be done? Luckily I can choose how many downloaded messages I get. I don't see any obvious evidence of hip crime style flooding attacks against s.a.a though a few other Usenet groups that I subscribe to have previously taken hits running at 20000 posts/hour until the miscreants were terminated. The junk posts usually persist for a few hours until third party bulk cancels catch up with the garbage. If you are unlucky you may see them. If you are seeing huge numbers of persistent but obviously random dross posts in s.a.a it is time to beat up on *your* ISP's newsmaster. It looks OK from here. Regards, -- Martin Brown |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jan Owen" uttered the magic word:
PLONK! And from out of nowhere appeared!: http://tinyurl.com/669js HTH? Chris.B |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jan Owen" wrote in message news:B5LZc.192724$sh.168332@fed1read06... You're right. A lotta' junk posts in here. Out you GO! PLONK! -- Jan Owen You're a mean spirited goof |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob May" wrote in message ... Sounds like you don't understand the UseNet newsgroups. There is no central location where these messages are kept so you have no single point that you can "repair" the newsgroup. In addition, this is a nonmoderated group so there is not anybody that can delete improper posts. As to the 48K posts, that is all that your newsgroup server has at the moment for the last x number of days in it's memory. There are a lot more than that that have been posted to the group over the many years that it has been around. Sounds like my ISP should do the housecleaning. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
KSetiSpy question | Eric | SETI | 12 | November 23rd 03 05:51 PM |
2/3 inch High Performance CCD Needed | Naveed ur Rahman | CCD Imaging | 1 | October 2nd 03 06:55 PM |
Chinese KT-1 launch failure? Translation needed | Gunter Krebs | Policy | 5 | September 25th 03 10:11 PM |