![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, now I've done it. I put too many ventillation holes in the mirror cell
end of my Starfinder Dob, and the star test now shows a poorly supported mirror. Not to worry though, I'll fix it. This is just a caution that anyone considering the Alan Adler fan modification might want to consider. Turns out there is a point at which the sonotube becomes sufficiently weak to deform the Meade Starfinder particle board mirror cell. As I see it, I have two "good" options here... first, fix it with a (good and cheap) replacement mirror cell... something I have been considering all along. The Meade mirror cell bolts into the sonotube in 4 positions, and the mirror is glued to particle board. I've wanted to replace it to reduce weight, but I've been equally reluctant as it will affect the balance point. My concern is that the balance point will move sufficiently far up the tube, that I will have to replace the base as well. At that point, I'm getting into enough cost, that I might as well go with option two, order a T-Scope truss conversion kit from Ed Taychert (I would _love_ to do this). ---------- As a third, "hack" option... interestingly, 3 points make a plane. The idea that the mirror cell is bolted in 4 points might work okay for other designs, but I got to thinking that, had the particle board been supported in only three positions, any "sag" from a weekend area in the sonotube might not have caused deformation, only miscollimation. I suppose I could try to prove that theory by mounting the particle board cell by simply driving three sheet rock screws in at 120 degree intervals and then pulling the original bolts... but, then, I've never had a better excuse to either rebuild the sonotube to reduce weight, or just go all out for the truss conversion. Stephen Paul |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stephen Paul wrote:
Well, now I've done it. I put too many ventillation holes in the mirror cell end of my Starfinder Dob, and the star test now shows a poorly supported mirror. Not to worry though, I'll fix it. I find it hard to believe that a weak tube could deform that thick Meade particle board cell, but I suppose it could happen. I know these are obvious questions, but it doesnt hurt to ask: Did you let the mirror stabilize before the star test? Have you removed the mirror from the cell lately? It's good practice to remove and reglue the mirror every so often because the wood will eventually warp, pinching the mirror. I had this problem twice with my old starfinder 10" dob. Dont forget to use stacks of dimes or something else to create a sufficient air gap when gluing the mirror to the cell. -tom |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stephen Paul wrote:
Well, now I've done it. I put too many ventillation holes in the mirror cell end of my Starfinder Dob, and the star test now shows a poorly supported mirror. Not to worry though, I'll fix it. This is just a caution that anyone considering the Alan Adler fan modification might want to consider. Turns out there is a point at which the sonotube becomes sufficiently weak to deform the Meade Starfinder particle board mirror cell. I followed the instructions given in the same article with my 12.5 inch Starfinder and had NO problems. The 5 exhaust holes are about an inch in diameter and spaced perhaps a wee bit more than an inch from each other. This installation can be seen at: http://home.earthlink.net/~martinhowell Once in the site, click on "Installation of fan. . ." -- Martin |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "vic20owner" wrote in message ... Stephen Paul wrote: Well, now I've done it. I put too many ventillation holes in the mirror cell end of my Starfinder Dob, and the star test now shows a poorly supported mirror. Not to worry though, I'll fix it. I find it hard to believe that a weak tube could deform that thick Meade particle board cell, but I suppose it could happen. I know these are obvious questions, but it doesnt hurt to ask: Did you let the mirror stabilize before the star test? Have you removed the mirror from the cell lately? It's good practice to remove and reglue the mirror every so often because the wood will eventually warp, pinching the mirror. I had this problem twice with my old starfinder 10" dob. Dont forget to use stacks of dimes or something else to create a sufficient air gap when gluing the mirror to the cell. Thanks for the feedback Tom. I keep the scope in the garage which is considerably cooler than the outside temps these days, so I suppose it could be that the mirror was too cold. I've had the same results twice now though, and once persistently over a period of more than a few hours wth the fan running full speed. So, although I could certainly be wrong, I'm not convinced that it's thermal issues. The star test looks pretty much exactly like that in Suiter's book, Figure 2.5 on page 27. In the past, tube currents would have the classic plume on one side, where this is definitely a triangular shaped pattern the closer you get to focus. If you go far enough out of focus, the Fresnel rings begin to appear circular. I first noticed this effect after drilling the three inch hole and installing the cooling fan. Before the fan, I had no such issues, even though, and unlike Alan Adler's mod, I've had eight 1 inch holes, about two and a half inches apart, drilled in the tube for quite a while. That said, I _am_ basing my conclusion solely on the difference in results after adding the fan, and fan on or off makes no difference. Of all that you have suggested, the mirror mounting itself being deformed seem the most reasonable. Certainly, looking at the sonotube, it doesn't _look_ like there are too many holes in it. Well, anyway, I ordered a UO mirror cell today, so this weekend's project will be ridding myself of the enclosed particle board setup. If for no other reason, than to get better convection. Stephen Paul |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Martin R. Howell" wrote in message ink.net... I followed the instructions given in the same article with my 12.5 inch Starfinder and had NO problems. The 5 exhaust holes are about an inch in diameter and spaced perhaps a wee bit more than an inch from each other. As indicated in my other response... I have 8 holes, 2 and a half inches apart. ;-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Making Black Holes Go 'Round on the Computer (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 31st 04 10:38 PM |
Big Bang & Black Holes -- worse conceptual problem thanmatter/antimatter asymetry? | [email protected] | Research | 0 | May 13th 04 11:25 AM |
Latest updates to the Meade Starfinder 12.5" | Stephen Paul | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | April 26th 04 01:47 AM |
Big black holes sing bass | Cathy | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | September 11th 03 04:48 AM |
Link between Black Holes and Galaxies Discovered in Our Own Backyard(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 17th 03 07:36 PM |