![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We think of our parrel universe sa being out side the horizon of our
universe (yes). It is parrel to our universe and only a centermeter devided by 1 with 33 zeros after it. We call this area of seperation a membrane. Talking this over with Treb we came to the same conclusions. Our two universes are exactly the same in size,and motion. The spacetime is flowing at the exact same rate. Direction of spin are oposite,and polarity is reversed because his electron is positive(positron) We both realize should this membrane break down and our two anti-universes touch it would be the end. It could be a new beginning. It would be a big bang. Bert Two hours to type this web breaking down |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... We think of our parrel universe sa being out side the horizon of our universe (yes). It is parrel to our universe and only a centermeter devided by 1 with 33 zeros after it. We call this area of seperation a membrane. Talking this over with Treb we came to the same conclusions. Our two universes are exactly the same in size,and motion. The spacetime is flowing at the exact same rate. Direction of spin are oposite,and polarity is reversed because his electron is positive(positron) We both realize should this membrane break down and our two anti-universes touch it would be the end. It could be a new beginning. It would be a big bang. Bert Two hours to type this web breaking down What if there are more then two branes? BV. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... We think of our parrel universe sa being out side the horizon of our universe (yes). It is parrel to our universe and only a centermeter devided by 1 with 33 zeros after it. We call this area of seperation a membrane. Talking this over with Treb we came to the same conclusions. Our two universes are exactly the same in size,and motion. The spacetime is flowing at the exact same rate. Direction of spin are oposite,and polarity is reversed because his electron is positive(positron) We both realize should this membrane break down and our two anti-universes touch it would be the end. It could be a new beginning. It would be a big bang. Bert Two hours to type this web breaking down BTW, kudos on the new thread for this topic. Keep it up! BV. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi BV More than two universes out there is so very right. Nature loves
to create universes for they are so easy to create.(two at a time continuously My best quotation. It goes like this. "Nature creates universes as it does flakes of snow in an endless storm" I could add they both are very symmetrical,and are flat. In the planck time of 10-^43 two universes are created continuously. BV think of the membrane as the film of a bubble. Some pop and produce only gamma rays. Some pop and become big bangs,and expand into entire universes such as ours Bert |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nightbat wrote
Benign Vanilla wrote: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... We think of our parrel universe sa being out side the horizon of our universe (yes). It is parrel to our universe and only a centermeter devided by 1 with 33 zeros after it. We call this area of seperation a membrane. Talking this over with Treb we came to the same conclusions. Our two universes are exactly the same in size,and motion. The spacetime is flowing at the exact same rate. Direction of spin are oposite,and polarity is reversed because his electron is positive(positron) We both realize should this membrane break down and our two anti-universes touch it would be the end. It could be a new beginning. It would be a big bang. Bert Two hours to type this web breaking down What if there are more then two branes? BV. nightbat Ha, ha, ha, ha, well BV, two Bert " branes " are better then one. Ha, ha, ha, ha. How is SpiderBertman doing because super action heroes need all the support they can get? There is evidence of only one Universe Bert, no matter what your sci fi bright book friends think or speculate otherwise. I hope the spider bite swelling has gone down and that you are feeling much better. Stars do have a form of sex (plasma sharing ) in space but they don't use protective membranes, ha, ha, ha, ha. ha. No wonder Dr. Einstein enjoyed talking with you those few minutes before going to his speech at Harvard, you have a way Bert. I'm also glad to hear your wife liked my defined new term for your personal tool, ha, ha, ha, please send her my respectful regards. ponder on, the nightbat |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi BV With multiple universes we can have very intriguing thoughts.
Since I have gravity creating universes out of the cosmic vacuum in pairs,multiple universes fit well. Gravity creates these universes in Planck size area, 10-^43.after that Guth'[s inflation increases their size in trillionth of a second to the size of a beach ball,and space expansion takes over from there. BV going back to branes think of these tiny forming universe as bubbles. BV when you take your Friday bubble bath look a the bubbles,for it is like looking at a universe from the outside in. If one pops it is Guth's theory in action. Bert |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi nightbat My hand took 3 days to get better. Florida has lots of
killer bugs(snakes to) nightbat if you only have your mind set on one universe that is naive thinking in our spacetime. You can't like string theory,big bangs or black holes.That I find very sad. Best to think in every direction. I would like to think my sci fi friends are Clarke,Asminov,Sagan etc Einstein had given his talk,and the 15 minutes I had with him was before he was picked up to go back to Princeton .Treb,and I agree two branes are better than one. Reality is each of us has two brains and they are separated by a membrane(brane) Bert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nightbat wrote
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: Hi nightbat My hand took 3 days to get better. Florida has lots of killer bugs(snakes to) nightbat if you only have your mind set on one universe that is naive thinking in our spacetime. You can't like string theory,big bangs or black holes.That I find very sad. Best to think in every direction. I would like to think my sci fi friends are Clarke,Asminov,Sagan etc Einstein had given his talk,and the 15 minutes I had with him was before he was picked up to go back to Princeton .Treb,and I agree two branes are better than one. Reality is each of us has two brains and they are separated by a membrane(brane) Bert nightbat I know I differ from your sci fi theoretical book friends Bert, but someone has to lead the crowd in the right direction. It was usually the unknown Maverick of the time that made the breakthrough into the non intuitive or intricate complexity of field dynamics. I have always steered you right despite all the others short of oc's explained larger theoretical vision Bert, and even before Mr. Hawking's reversal agreeing now with my original postulate of a deep gravity depression ability to theoretically disperse back into this same Universe. I have tried to guild you when you were veering a little off, prodding you to stay with it, and enjoyed and complemented you when you were theoretically right on. Your basic spin is in is correct, so enlarge upon it and relate it to how all energy and matter is attempting to renormalize in a disturbed overlapping field. Remember Newton's laws, and of Einstein's field curved pointing metric. And that the cause of gravity force is the default effect of a system in chaotic non uniform momentum attempting to base field neutralize. The actual unified base field frame has not or ever been present in all of our space time to reference to therefore presenting the previous stumbling block to unified field theory understanding. Glad to hear you're feeling much better, and big E when you got to chat with him was shortly on his way to Princeton not Harvard, ok. always ponder on, the nightbat |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nightbat wrote in message ...
nightbat wrote G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: Hi nightbat My hand took 3 days to get better. Florida has lots of killer bugs(snakes to) nightbat if you only have your mind set on one universe that is naive thinking in our spacetime. You can't like string theory,big bangs or black holes.That I find very sad. Best to think in every direction. I would like to think my sci fi friends are Clarke,Asminov,Sagan etc Einstein had given his talk,and the 15 minutes I had with him was before he was picked up to go back to Princeton .Treb,and I agree two branes are better than one. Reality is each of us has two brains and they are separated by a membrane(brane) Bert nightbat I know I differ from your sci fi theoretical book friends Bert, but someone has to lead the crowd in the right direction. It was usually the unknown Maverick of the time that made the breakthrough into the non intuitive or intricate complexity of field dynamics. I have always steered you right despite all the others short of oc's explained larger theoretical vision Bert, and even before Mr. Hawking's reversal agreeing now with my original postulate of a deep gravity depression ability to theoretically disperse back into this same Universe. I have tried to guild you when you were veering a little off, prodding you to stay with it, and enjoyed and complemented you when you were theoretically right on. Your basic spin is in is correct, so enlarge upon it and relate it to how all energy and matter is attempting to renormalize in a disturbed overlapping field. Remember Newton's laws, and of Einstein's field curved pointing metric. And that the cause of gravity force is the default effect of a system in chaotic non uniform momentum attempting to base field neutralize. The actual unified base field frame has not or ever been present in all of our space time to reference to therefore presenting the previous stumbling block to unified field theory understanding. Glad to hear you're feeling much better, and big E when you got to chat with him was shortly on his way to Princeton not Harvard, ok. always ponder on, the nightbat I wonder what secrets of the Universe Einstein whispered into Bert's ear during that precious 15 minutes that served to so enlighten him? Whatever Einstein told him must have given his thinking a certain "spin"! Double-A |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Double A Einstein was very kind to me. He was dying,and I was only a
young lad. Irma Ring the lady I( was building a deck for) told Einstein I loved science. He asked me if I was going to be a carpenter all my life. I told him about G=EMC^2. We talked about inertia and gravity. Einstein Double A did not spin me into thinking science. It was the spinning of a gyro. Bert |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Discovery of DW 2004 validates the Sollog PDF Formula for Planetary Distances | hermesnines | Misc | 0 | February 23rd 04 08:28 PM |
Relative Distance & Mass of the Sun and Earth | JeffP | Misc | 5 | January 11th 04 05:17 PM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |
Sun's position relative to the planets? | Matthew F Funke | Science | 5 | July 15th 03 02:34 PM |