A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Relative distances



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 21st 04, 02:59 PM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Relative distances

We think of our parrel universe sa being out side the horizon of our
universe (yes). It is parrel to our universe and only a centermeter
devided by 1 with 33 zeros after it. We call this area of seperation a
membrane. Talking this over with Treb we came to the same conclusions.
Our two universes are exactly the same in size,and motion. The spacetime
is flowing at the exact same rate. Direction of spin are oposite,and
polarity is reversed because his electron is positive(positron) We
both realize should this membrane break down and our two anti-universes
touch it would be the end. It could be a new beginning. It would be a
big bang. Bert Two hours to type this web breaking down

  #2  
Old August 23rd 04, 03:10 PM
Benign Vanilla
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
We think of our parrel universe sa being out side the horizon of our
universe (yes). It is parrel to our universe and only a centermeter
devided by 1 with 33 zeros after it. We call this area of seperation a
membrane. Talking this over with Treb we came to the same conclusions.
Our two universes are exactly the same in size,and motion. The spacetime
is flowing at the exact same rate. Direction of spin are oposite,and
polarity is reversed because his electron is positive(positron) We
both realize should this membrane break down and our two anti-universes
touch it would be the end. It could be a new beginning. It would be a
big bang. Bert Two hours to type this web breaking down


What if there are more then two branes?

BV.


  #3  
Old August 23rd 04, 03:11 PM
Benign Vanilla
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
We think of our parrel universe sa being out side the horizon of our
universe (yes). It is parrel to our universe and only a centermeter
devided by 1 with 33 zeros after it. We call this area of seperation a
membrane. Talking this over with Treb we came to the same conclusions.
Our two universes are exactly the same in size,and motion. The spacetime
is flowing at the exact same rate. Direction of spin are oposite,and
polarity is reversed because his electron is positive(positron) We
both realize should this membrane break down and our two anti-universes
touch it would be the end. It could be a new beginning. It would be a
big bang. Bert Two hours to type this web breaking down


BTW, kudos on the new thread for this topic. Keep it up!

BV.


  #4  
Old August 23rd 04, 07:01 PM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi BV More than two universes out there is so very right. Nature loves
to create universes for they are so easy to create.(two at a time
continuously My best quotation. It goes like this. "Nature creates
universes as it does flakes of snow in an endless storm" I could add
they both are very symmetrical,and are flat. In the planck time of
10-^43 two universes are created continuously. BV think of the membrane
as the film of a bubble. Some pop and produce only gamma rays. Some pop
and become big bangs,and expand into entire universes such as ours Bert

  #5  
Old August 23rd 04, 09:32 PM
nightbat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nightbat wrote

Benign Vanilla wrote:

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
We think of our parrel universe sa being out side the horizon of our
universe (yes). It is parrel to our universe and only a centermeter
devided by 1 with 33 zeros after it. We call this area of seperation a
membrane. Talking this over with Treb we came to the same conclusions.
Our two universes are exactly the same in size,and motion. The spacetime
is flowing at the exact same rate. Direction of spin are oposite,and
polarity is reversed because his electron is positive(positron) We
both realize should this membrane break down and our two anti-universes
touch it would be the end. It could be a new beginning. It would be a
big bang. Bert Two hours to type this web breaking down


What if there are more then two branes?

BV.


nightbat

Ha, ha, ha, ha, well BV, two Bert " branes " are better then
one. Ha, ha, ha, ha. How is SpiderBertman doing because super action
heroes need all the support they can get? There is evidence of only one
Universe Bert, no matter what your sci fi bright book friends think or
speculate otherwise. I hope the spider bite swelling has gone down and
that you are feeling much better. Stars do have a form of sex (plasma
sharing ) in space but they don't use protective membranes, ha, ha, ha,
ha. ha.

No wonder Dr. Einstein enjoyed talking with you those few minutes before
going to his speech at Harvard, you have a way Bert. I'm also glad to
hear your wife liked my defined new term for your personal tool, ha, ha,
ha, please send her my respectful regards.


ponder on,
the nightbat

  #6  
Old August 24th 04, 12:54 PM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi BV With multiple universes we can have very intriguing thoughts.
Since I have gravity creating universes out of the cosmic vacuum in
pairs,multiple universes fit well. Gravity creates these universes in
Planck size area, 10-^43.after that Guth'[s inflation increases their
size in trillionth of a second to the size of a beach ball,and space
expansion takes over from there. BV going back to branes think of these
tiny forming universe as bubbles. BV when you take your Friday bubble
bath look a the bubbles,for it is like looking at a universe from the
outside in. If one pops it is Guth's theory in action. Bert

  #7  
Old August 24th 04, 02:01 PM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi nightbat My hand took 3 days to get better. Florida has lots of
killer bugs(snakes to) nightbat if you only have your
mind set on one universe that is naive thinking in our spacetime. You
can't like string theory,big bangs or black holes.That I find very sad.
Best to think in every direction. I would like to think my sci fi
friends are Clarke,Asminov,Sagan etc Einstein had given his
talk,and the 15 minutes I had with him was before he was picked up to go
back to Princeton .Treb,and I agree two branes are better than one.
Reality is each of us has two brains and they are separated by a
membrane(brane) Bert

  #8  
Old August 24th 04, 03:24 PM
nightbat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nightbat wrote

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:

Hi nightbat My hand took 3 days to get better. Florida has lots of
killer bugs(snakes to) nightbat if you only have your
mind set on one universe that is naive thinking in our spacetime. You
can't like string theory,big bangs or black holes.That I find very sad.
Best to think in every direction. I would like to think my sci fi
friends are Clarke,Asminov,Sagan etc Einstein had given his
talk,and the 15 minutes I had with him was before he was picked up to go
back to Princeton .Treb,and I agree two branes are better than one.
Reality is each of us has two brains and they are separated by a
membrane(brane) Bert


nightbat

I know I differ from your sci fi theoretical book friends Bert,
but someone has to lead the crowd in the right direction. It was usually
the unknown Maverick of the time that made the breakthrough into the non
intuitive or intricate complexity of field dynamics. I have always
steered you right despite all the others short of oc's explained larger
theoretical vision Bert, and even before Mr. Hawking's reversal agreeing
now with my original postulate of a deep gravity depression ability to
theoretically disperse back into this same Universe. I have tried to
guild you when you were veering a little off, prodding you to stay with
it, and enjoyed and complemented you when you were theoretically right
on. Your basic spin is in is correct, so enlarge upon it and relate it
to how all energy and matter is attempting to renormalize in a disturbed
overlapping field. Remember Newton's laws, and of Einstein's field
curved pointing metric. And that the cause of gravity force is the
default effect of a system in chaotic non uniform momentum attempting to
base field neutralize. The actual unified base field frame has not or
ever been present in all of our space time to reference to therefore
presenting the previous stumbling block to unified field theory
understanding.

Glad to hear you're feeling much better, and big E when you got to chat
with him was shortly on his way to Princeton not Harvard, ok.


always ponder on,
the nightbat

  #9  
Old August 24th 04, 07:36 PM
Double-A
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nightbat wrote in message ...
nightbat wrote

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:

Hi nightbat My hand took 3 days to get better. Florida has lots of
killer bugs(snakes to) nightbat if you only have your
mind set on one universe that is naive thinking in our spacetime. You
can't like string theory,big bangs or black holes.That I find very sad.
Best to think in every direction. I would like to think my sci fi
friends are Clarke,Asminov,Sagan etc Einstein had given his
talk,and the 15 minutes I had with him was before he was picked up to go
back to Princeton .Treb,and I agree two branes are better than one.
Reality is each of us has two brains and they are separated by a
membrane(brane) Bert


nightbat

I know I differ from your sci fi theoretical book friends Bert,
but someone has to lead the crowd in the right direction. It was usually
the unknown Maverick of the time that made the breakthrough into the non
intuitive or intricate complexity of field dynamics. I have always
steered you right despite all the others short of oc's explained larger
theoretical vision Bert, and even before Mr. Hawking's reversal agreeing
now with my original postulate of a deep gravity depression ability to
theoretically disperse back into this same Universe. I have tried to
guild you when you were veering a little off, prodding you to stay with
it, and enjoyed and complemented you when you were theoretically right
on. Your basic spin is in is correct, so enlarge upon it and relate it
to how all energy and matter is attempting to renormalize in a disturbed
overlapping field. Remember Newton's laws, and of Einstein's field
curved pointing metric. And that the cause of gravity force is the
default effect of a system in chaotic non uniform momentum attempting to
base field neutralize. The actual unified base field frame has not or
ever been present in all of our space time to reference to therefore
presenting the previous stumbling block to unified field theory
understanding.

Glad to hear you're feeling much better, and big E when you got to chat
with him was shortly on his way to Princeton not Harvard, ok.


always ponder on,
the nightbat



I wonder what secrets of the Universe Einstein whispered into Bert's
ear during that precious 15 minutes that served to so enlighten him?

Whatever Einstein told him must have given his thinking a certain
"spin"!

Double-A
  #10  
Old August 25th 04, 12:07 AM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Double A Einstein was very kind to me. He was dying,and I was only a
young lad. Irma Ring the lady I( was building a deck for) told Einstein
I loved science. He asked me if I was going to be a carpenter all my
life. I told him about G=EMC^2. We talked about inertia and gravity.
Einstein Double A did not spin me into thinking science. It was the
spinning of a gyro. Bert

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discovery of DW 2004 validates the Sollog PDF Formula for Planetary Distances hermesnines Misc 0 February 23rd 04 08:28 PM
Relative Distance & Mass of the Sun and Earth JeffP Misc 5 January 11th 04 05:17 PM
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light ralph sansbury Astronomy Misc 8 August 31st 03 02:53 AM
Sun's position relative to the planets? Matthew F Funke Science 5 July 15th 03 02:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.