Death of the Theory of the Evolution of Man

Ed Conrad wrote:



The theory of the evolution of man is the greatest conspiracy
against truth in the history of science, quite likely in the history
of the world.

================================================ ====

~~ MAN AS OLD AS COAL ~~
Evolution May Crumble in the Wake of Startling New Evidence


================================================== =

ALL SPECIMENS FOUND BETWEEN
PENNSYLVANIA'S ANTHRACITE VEINS

(Strata geologically dated at a minimum of 280 million years)


or it is a time travel experiment that went (will?) go wrong.

kegwasher

Thank you for introducing some humour to the newsgroup - it's been taken far
too seriously lately!

Ed Conrad wrote:



The theory of the evolution of man is the greatest conspiracy
against truth in the history of science, quite likely in the history
of the world.

================================================= ===

~~ MAN AS OLD AS COAL ~~
Evolution May Crumble in the Wake of Startling New Evidence


================================================== =

ALL SPECIMENS FOUND BETWEEN
PENNSYLVANIA'S ANTHRACITE VEINS

(Strata geologically dated at a minimum of 280 million years)

These are just some of the specimens of petrified bones, teeth
and/or soft organs -- some human -- that were discovered between
two anthracite veins in Northeastern Pennsylvania over the past two
decades..

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z11calv.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z8femur.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-013F.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z5gall.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/newtibia.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/skullb.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z9lung.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified\MVC-013F.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/Dfoot.jpg

And one more for good measu

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/pp/MVC-022S.JPG

The Scientific Establishment has long contended that neither man nor
any large land animal existed back in the Carboniferous Period -- 280
million years ago.

But here's the evidence that disproves many of its theories, including
the evolution of man mulit-millions later.

================================================== ==

But, now, a word from our sponso, Truth Inc.:

http://edconrad.com/canals/hooton.gif

================================================== ==

The following specimen was identified as a petrified human calvarium,
a skull with the eyesockets broken off, by the late Wilton Krogman,
one of the world's foremost human anatomists and the author
of "The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine."

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z11calv.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/krogwskull.jpg

Moments after this photo was taken of Krogman holding the specimen,
an associate -- a medical doctor -- walked into his office at the
Cooper Clinic in Lancaster, Pa., and he encouraged him to see "the
oldesthuman skull ever found."

Two other photos of the specimen:

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/MVC-006S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/MVC-007S.JPG

A CATscan revealed a second protrusion not visible to the naked
eye and it is located precisely where it would be expected to be
found in a human cranium.

That report follows:

http://www.edconrad.com/images/catcalv.jpg

This specimen also tested positive for the presence of Haversian
canals under microscopic scrutiny.

Additionally, American Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va.,
found "a composition of dried blood intermingled with a few
small crystals resembling calcium oxalate dihydrate."

The laboratory's official report follows:

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-012S.JPG

=============================================

Another petrified human skull was found a year later embedded in
a boulder weighing an estimated 3,000 pounds.

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/skulla.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/skullb.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/other1.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z2_2.jpg

The Smithsonian was sent a photograph and Raymond Rye, musem
specialist, replied in writing: "The object ... does resemble the
outline of a human skull ... We must do a microscopic study
of the outer rind to determine if it has the structure of bone."

http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/rr072782.gif

The Smithsonian was sent granules, then replied: "X-ray analysis
of the material reveals it to be quartz, the most abundatnt material
o the earth's crust. So, although the enigmatic object exposed
in the boulder may resemble a hominid skull, its mineral compostion
is definitely not that of bone."

http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/rr090982.gif

The fact is, "x-ray analysis" is NOTan appropriate test to identify
the presence or absence of cellular structure (tiny circles known
as Haversian canals).

Later, a microcopic photo of granules removed from the specimen
revealed the presence of Haversian canals.

Here's one of those microscopic photos of the cell structu

http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/proof1.jpg

================================================= ===

This is a petrified human femur still in shale, a near-cousin to coal,
that also was unearthed from between anthracite veins. Portions of
the bulb ends have broken off.

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z8femur.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z6femur.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/z7femur.jpg

Since a femur measures approximately one-fourth of a human
being's height, the femur belonged to someone at least 7 1/2-foot
tall.

================================================= ====

The following specimen was identified as a portion of a tibia by
Krogman and was subjected to one of the greatest cover-ups
in the history of science.

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/newtibia.jpg

Andrew Macrae, then of Calgary University, performed fraudulent
testing when entrusted to examine its cellular structure and publish
the microscopic photos on his web page. He instead posted microscopic
photos of a rock or a concretion.

Macrae undoubtedly was advised and assisted by Paul Myers, then
of Temple University in Philadelphia and now at the University of
Minnesota.

When charged with participating in the scam, Myers adamantly denied
it. Then, when I suggested officials of Temple University check on
their long-distance telephone calls during the time that Macrae was
"testing" the specimen in the summer of 1996, Myers suddenly admitted
in the talk.origins news group that he had made many phone calls
to Calgary University around that time, on other business.

It didn't end there. Myers later admitted in talk.origins that he had
actually FLOWN to Calgary one weekend during that time period and had
spent time at the university. He said he didn't even have a chance to
say hello to Macrae, claiming he was there on other business.

Here are two additional photos of the portion of the petrified tibia,
known as EC96-001 for Macrae's fraudulent testing purposes.

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossil/z15tib2.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossil/z15tib1.jpg

In addition, a scanning electronic microscope (SEM) was used
to examine the interior surface features of this specimen to compare
it with cadaver bone at the same power magnification. These are
the photos at 2,000-times magnification..

http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/bones.jpg

(They would look incredibly similiar if the grains were lying in
exactly the same direction.)

The photo on the left in the following photo is what Macrae posted
on his web page, claiming it was the cell structure of EC96-001 which
Krogman had identified as a portion of a tibia. The next two photos
show its true cell structure.

http://www.edconrad.com/canals/ts_compare1.jpg
http://edconrad.com/canals/slide1.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/canals/0505160x.jpg

It was just one of several fraudulent maneuvers perpetrated by members
of the Scientifiic Establishment over the past 22 years when the first
specimen -- the large petrified skull -- was discovered in June
1981.

Additionally, American Medical Laboratories performed calculus
analysis by crystallography on EC96-001 and determined that it
"consisted predominately of dried blood and protein."

That report follows:

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-006S.JPG

==============================================

Here is an assorment of miscellaneous specimens, primarily portions
of petrified mandibles (jaw bones), found between the same coal veins:

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-001S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-002S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-003S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-004S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-005S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-007S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-008S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-009S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-010S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-011S.JPG

==============================================

Here's a petrified human lung, also found between the coal veins.

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-015S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-016S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-017S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-018S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-019S.JPG

(For comparison, check Grey's Anatomy.)

A lung is a soft organ and some say soft organs can never
petrify. Howver, it has been established conclusively that
soft organs can indeed be subjected to the petrification process.

============================================

Here's a petrified gall bladder and, incredibly, a CATscan revealed
the presence of a gall stone inside.

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z5gall.jpg

This is one of the specimens that also was tested by American
Medical Laboratories via calculus analysis by crystallography.

It revealed the specimen "consists of a few small pieces of dried
blood," adding that "none of the constituents normally found
in urinary calculi are present." (which comes as no surprise since
the specimen it tested is petrified).

That report follows:

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-010S.JPG

============================================
Here are a pair of petrified fetuses.The large one, which has been
transformed to a coal-like substance, measures 6 1/2 inches
in length.

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-010S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-011S.JPG

Here'ss a portion of a dinosaur foot embedded in slate (or shale):

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-012S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-013S.JPG

It should be noted that a third "toe" was later found embedded
in the slate, part of a third "toe." A video tape exists showing
the slow removal of the slate and it being buried just beneath
the surface of the slate slab.

=============================================

And, now, another word from our sponsor, Truth Inc.:

http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/headline.gif

==============================================


The following is the very first discovery of petrified bone in
coal-bearing Carboniferous strata in June 1981.

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/first.jpg

It resembled a giant skull and the Smithsonian expressd an interest
in examining it personally. However, when it was taken there,
its experts dismissed it as a rock or concretion without any testing
whatsoever.

To make matters worse, none of its three of its "experts" -- an
anthropologist, a paleontologist and a geologist -- mentioned that
a microscopic study of its cell structure would accurately identify
whether it is bone.

When the three Smithsonian "experts" concurred that the specimen
was a rock or a concretion, they were asked if they would like to keep
it to break open the jawlike area and see if it contains teeth. They
laughed at the suggestion and the specimen returned to Shenandoah, Pa.

About a month later, a pair of inclusions were found inside the
jaw-like area and, when Krogman saw an enlargefd photo of one of them,
he identified it as a premolar because he could see "a pair of cusps."

Here's where the object was found inside the jaw area:

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-014S.JPG

The photo below shows the premolar still attached, with a dime
used to indicate size.

http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/z1.jpg

Krogman suggested an infrared scan be performed and it was done
at American Medical Laboratories. Here's the result of the test:

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/graph.gif

The laboratory stated that its infrared scan determined that there
were "absorbances at approximately 9.8 and 12.8 micrometers,
appearing similiar to some phosphates."

Later interpretation of the scan determined that the object is
bone or tooth in origin, definitely not a rock or a concretion.

http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/compatible.gif

Last but not least,a microscopic study ofthe specimen's cell structure
revealed the presence of Haversian canals.

============================================

Here's a petrified handcrafted wooden handle which has been
transformed to anthracite. It also was found between the same two
coal veins.

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-001S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-002S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-004S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-003S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-005S.JPG

============================================

Here's a portion of petrified bone still embedded in slate,
confirming that the bone is older than the material in which
it was encased. Obviously, that material had to be fluid or in a
near-fluid state at the time for this to happen.

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-014S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-015S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-016S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-017S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-018S.JPG

============================================

Here's a giant canine tooth, found between the same coal veins:

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-009S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-007S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-008S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-006S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-010S.JPG

(Please note that this giant petrified tooth was accidentally dropped
on the sidewalk in Hazleton, Pa.. The tip broke off but fits together
almost perfectly.)

These specimens and the honest testing results prove, beyond
the shadow of a doubt, that man and large land animals had existed
while coal was being formed.

This is NOT theory and rhetoric, which is what the pseudoscientists
have used to brainwash the common man. It is physical evidence,
which is what science is supposed to be all about.

================================================= =

Here's another petrified fetus, this one still embedded in slate (or
shale.

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-012S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-013S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-014S.JPG

=============================================== ==

And, now, another word from our sponsor, Truth Inc.

http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/quotesnew.gif

=============================================== =

The following is a portion of a giant prehistoric scorpion that was
identified as such by Wilton Krogman.

When Krogman examined this specimen found between coal veins,
he revealed that he had performed countless disections of scorpions
in college before attaining status as one of the world's most
respected uthorities on human anatomy.

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-006S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-007S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-008S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-013S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-011S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-007S.JPG

This specimen was discovered in two pieces that fit together
perfectly.

It must be emphasized that this particular specimen was the
subject of another cover-up by members of the Scientific
Establishment -- at Penn State University.

Penn State actually batted three-for-three with its attempted
cover-ups: First, its Department of Paleontology (Roger Cuffey);
Second, its Department of Anthropology (Robert Eckardt). Third,
its Department of Entomology (Charles Pitts).

========================================

To those questioning if some of the specimens are petrified bone,
Yerkes Regional Primate Research Denter at Emory University
in Atlanta, Ga. -- which Krogman described as "the most prestigious
institution of its kind in the world" --.determined that it is,
indeed, B-O-N-E.

Jeremy Dahl, one of its bone experts who examined and tested it,
even put it in writing and signed his name..

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/YERKES1.TIF
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/YERKES2.TIF
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/YERKES3.TIF

It should also be pointed out that Dahl had examined the specimen's
cell structure because a slice had been removed from it while in
Yerkes' possession (for microccopic study of the cell structure)..

=============================================== ==

Here's another petrified hominid jaw:

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-010S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-011S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-004S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-002S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-003S.JPG

=============================================== =

This is a piece of petrified wood that had been transformed into
a coal-like material. It was handcarved and found between those
two anthracite veins.

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-001S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-002S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-003S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-004S.JPG

==========================================

Here are three photos of a strange object embedded in slate:

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslate1.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslate2.jpg

==========================================

Here's another soft organ that had petrified:

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-008S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-011S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-010S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-009S.JPG

=============================================

Here are what appear to be petrified eggs:

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-021F.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-022F.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-023F.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-024F.JPG

==========================================

Here are other specimens of petrified bone embedded in slate.

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-014S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-015S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-018S.JPG

===========================================

Here are two strange specimens, almost similiar. What makes them
so intriguing is that they were found between anthracite veins some
40 miles apart -- one near Shenandoah and the other near Wilkes-Barre.

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-016S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-017S.JPG

===============================================

he late, great Raymond Dart, MD., relished the opportunity to examine
some of the specimens after Krogman informed him about them.

This photo shows Dart holding what Krogman identified as a calvarium,
a human cranium with the eye sockets broken off.

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/dart.jpg

Here's Raymond Dart's letter:

===========================================

28 October, 1983

Dear Mr. Conrad:

This is being written as a follow-up to our meeting here in
Philadelphia on Saturday, Oct. 15, during which I had the
opportunity to examine many of the rock-like objects you
had discovered in the coal fields of Pennsylvania, near
Shenandoah.

In my opinion, the vast majority bear the contour of bone
and may well be petrified bone.

I was particularly intrigued by one of your specimens which
I agree bears a distinct resemblance to a dainosaur head
or a homind skullcap, heavily petrified.

Based on our vast ignorance about vulconology, as regards
both anatomy and anthropology, I am of the opinion that your
findings definitely warrant intense investigation by that subject's
foremost experts, especially here in America where so many
volcanic disturbances occur even today.

Yours sincerely,
Raymond A. Dart (signed)

Raymond A. Dart, M.D.
Institute of Man
The Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential
8801 Stenton Avenue
Philadelphia, Pa. 19118

Here's a photo of Raymond Dart with Ed Conrad (the photo was
taken by a house painter who had to come down off a ladder
to do so.)

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/wdart.jpg

===============================================

That man co-existed with dinosaurs -- back while anthracite was being
formed -- gains credence with these photos of a petrified dinosaur
foot embedded in slate.

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z3dino.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/Dfoot.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossil/MVC-039S.JPG

===========================================

Here's a portion of another hominid jaw:

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-010S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-011S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-004S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-002S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-003S.JPG

===========================================

More specimens of petrified bone embedded in slate:

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbon...atemystery.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/other2.jpg

======================================

Another petrified fetus, still embedded in slate:

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-001S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-002S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-003S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-004S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-005S.JPG

==============================================

Another specimen embedded in slate:

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslate1.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslate2.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslate5.jpg

A horse? The Easter bunny? Then, again, it might be the head
of a petrified jackass.

And, IF it is, it would be only appropriate.

The Scientific Establishment -- with its worldwide brood of arrogant,
self-serving tenured bureaucratic fossils -- has long been treating
John Q. Public, and his kids, like a jackass. promoting fairy tales
and molesting truth.

Over the past 22 years, it has engaged in deceit, deception, collusion
and conspiracy -- of MONUMENTAL proportions -- and one of the
ringleaders has been the Smithsonian Institution.

Ed Conrad
edconrad.com

Man as Old as Coal

================================================== ====

Ed Conrad wrote in message
...


The theory of the evolution of man is the greatest conspiracy
against truth in the history of science, quite likely in the history
of the world.

heh, uh, OK, I'll play.
Here's the deal Ed, if you wish to prove that evolution is wrong you have
one of two choices.

First of all, take the scientific definition of evolution (not the cartoon
definition that the creationist nitwits have attached to it, the REAL
definition) and simply disprove it.
Here's a clue - it has nothing to do with coal, and lots to do with
something called genes.

Failing that (and you will fail that) just disprove the central dogma of
biology -
that DNA -RNA-Protein.

Before you set about on either endeavor, try to understand that the fact
that gene frequencies change and that DNA becomes RNA becomes Protein, are
as well known as it is possible to know something.
If that doesn't fit in with your Iron Aged revised Bronze Age mythology, the
problem is with you, not science. And realize that while you sit with your
head buried in pre-Enlightenment sand, people are using what we know about
evolution to change life in ways that ought to frighten you.

It's the 21st Century d00d, join us!

"Tim Kozusko" ...

...

And realize that while you sit with your
head buried in pre-Enlightenment sand, people are using what we know about
evolution to change life in ways that ought to frighten you.

I find that my head is where I and my head enjoy the surroundings.

That aside I agree with you [I am frightened but only personally for
when I die the world ends], even though the only real "knowledge"
I possess regarding any connections between evolution and today's
biotech, benetech, and AItech is my imagination. However, my
imagination is a very comforting and wise friend.

Mind you there are many who wish me and my imagination would
move to Iraq. I should I would probably find some sort of
"employment".

JHall.

Actually, I can see why someone would want to get rid of the theory of
evolution. It is premised on the idea that the universe is
essentially meaningless, that everything occured randomly. Why would
anyone want to uphold
an idea like that?

I'm reminded also of those people who used to applaud Robert Ingersoll
for telling them that they had no souls. Is that such a comforting
thought that it deserves enthusiasm? I think not.

Evolution is aesthetically an ugly idea. If I were a scientist I'd be
out there making my pitch for intelligent design. Intelligence trumps
non-intelligence every time.

Bob Champ


(Ed Conrad) wrote in message ...
The theory of the evolution of man is the greatest conspiracy
against truth in the history of science, quite likely in the history
of the world.

Bob Champ wrote in message
om...
Actually, I can see why someone would want to get rid of the theory of
evolution. It is premised on the idea that the universe is
essentially meaningless, that everything occured randomly.

um, no it is not.

Evolution is aesthetically an ugly idea.

Maybe, if you know nothing about biology.

If I were a scientist ...

Well, there you go.

(Ed Conrad) wrote in message ...
The theory of the evolution of man is the greatest conspiracy
against truth in the history of science, quite likely in the history
of the world.

================================================= ===

~~ MAN AS OLD AS COAL ~~
Evolution May Crumble in the Wake of Startling New Evidence


================================================== =

snip

repost

Well, of course, there's nothing "new" about this "evidence." You've
been posting it for years.

Here's just one article that refutes it:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...&output=gplain

This article was written by me and, Ed, I'm the LEAST qualified to
refute you from the scientific standpoint.

Now, Ed, here's the most recent challenge from which you have been
running:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...&output=gplain

I also sweetened the pot and offered to pay full costs of a polygraph
and, if any of the experts agree that any of your specimens are
genuine - even ONE of them - I said I'd get you that special on Fox.

If you were really that confident in your claims, you'd jump at this
chance.

So why are you running from it?

snip

/repost

In newsavid Sienkiewicz typed:
(Ed Conrad) wrote in message

Any reason why you twits are crossposting this to sci.space.shuttle?
s.s.s. snipped. [followups set]
--
Mike

Ed Conrad wrote:


The theory of the evolution of man is the greatest conspiracy
against truth in the history of science, quite likely in the history
of the world.


God you'r insecure.