![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Metcheck are currently forecasting 63% cloud cover for June 8th for
West Sussex ![]() http://www.metcheck.com/index.asp Thankfully, NCD is still a long way off in weather terms. How many of you are heading down my way I wonder ;-) ? So - it's currently a 63% chance of success for NCD and a 37% chance of success for the Transit. -- Pete Lawrence http://www.pbl33.co.uk Most recent images http://www.pbl33.fast24.co.uk/recent_images.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Those odds are worse than for the eclipse of 1999.
Fingers crossed for all. Kevin Probably heading to a sand storm. So - it's currently a 63% chance of success for NCD and a 37% chance of success for the Transit. -- Pete Lawrence http://www.pbl33.co.uk Most recent images http://www.pbl33.fast24.co.uk/recent_images.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 27 May 2004 10:39:38 +0000 (UTC), "Kevin Smith"
wrote: So - it's currently a 63% chance of success for NCD and a 37% chance of success for the Transit. Those odds are worse than for the eclipse of 1999. Fingers crossed for all. Kevin Probably heading to a sand storm. Why - are you heading overseas? -- Pete Lawrence http://www.pbl33.co.uk Most recent images http://www.pbl33.fast24.co.uk/recent_images.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Pete Lawrence
writes Metcheck are currently forecasting 63% cloud cover for June 8th for West Sussex ![]() http://www.metcheck.com/index.asp Thankfully, NCD is still a long way off in weather terms. How many of you are heading down my way I wonder ;-) ? So - it's currently a 63% chance of success for NCD and a 37% chance of success for the Transit. There is also a thread on uk.sci.weather that may be of interest. Newsgroups: uk.sci.weather Subject: Forecast discussion (UPDATE MAY27): Venus transit 2004 Jun 08 Message-ID: 12itc.23$0e2.17@newsfe4-gui They agree serious risk of cloud, but with enough breaks that there should be a good chance for everyone to get a glimpse of the event. However, the forecasts made from this far out are notoriously inaccurate. Regards, -- Martin Brown |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pete Lawrence" wrote in message ... Metcheck are currently forecasting 63% cloud cover for June 8th for West Sussex ![]() http://www.metcheck.com/index.asp Thankfully, NCD is still a long way off in weather terms. How many of you are heading down my way I wonder ;-) ? So - it's currently a 63% chance of success for NCD and a 37% chance of success for the Transit. -- Pete Lawrence http://www.pbl33.co.uk Most recent images http://www.pbl33.fast24.co.uk/recent_images.html 85% for me ![]() Tony |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 27 May 2004 14:06:46 +0100, Martin Brown
wrote: There is also a thread on uk.sci.weather that may be of interest. Newsgroups: uk.sci.weather Subject: Forecast discussion (UPDATE MAY27): Venus transit 2004 Jun 08 Message-ID: 12itc.23$0e2.17@newsfe4-gui They agree serious risk of cloud, but with enough breaks that there should be a good chance for everyone to get a glimpse of the event. However, the forecasts made from this far out are notoriously inaccurate. Yes - it may also be encouraging to note that I've often noted the 8-14 day forecast on Metcheck saying cloud, cloud and more cloud and then finding out that the physical reality was nothing as bad as predicted. -- Pete Lawrence http://www.pbl33.co.uk Most recent images http://www.pbl33.fast24.co.uk/recent_images.html |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pete Lawrence" wrote in message ... On Thu, 27 May 2004 14:06:46 +0100, Martin Brown wrote: There is also a thread on uk.sci.weather that may be of interest. Newsgroups: uk.sci.weather Subject: Forecast discussion (UPDATE MAY27): Venus transit 2004 Jun 08 Message-ID: 12itc.23$0e2.17@newsfe4-gui .... I'm going to cross-post the thread into this ng sometime early next week - either Monday or Tuesday, by which time I hope the models have settled somewhat. I agree other comments that *most* should see at least *something* of this event first-hand - the trick is trying to suggest those who will see the lengthiest period of view. Martin. -- FAQ & Glossary for uk.sci.weather at:- http://homepage.ntlworld.com/booty.weather/uswfaqfr.htm |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 28 May 2004 07:41:49 +0100, "Martin Rowley"
wrote: "Pete Lawrence" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 27 May 2004 14:06:46 +0100, Martin Brown wrote: There is also a thread on uk.sci.weather that may be of interest. Newsgroups: uk.sci.weather Subject: Forecast discussion (UPDATE MAY27): Venus transit 2004 Jun 08 Message-ID: 12itc.23$0e2.17@newsfe4-gui ... I'm going to cross-post the thread into this ng sometime early next week - either Monday or Tuesday, by which time I hope the models have settled somewhat. I agree other comments that *most* should see at least *something* of this event first-hand - the trick is trying to suggest those who will see the lengthiest period of view. Thanks Martin (not another Martin - sorry uk.s.a is overrun with them ;-)! ). I think people would be interested to know what the chances are that they will be able to see something of this event. Not knowing a great dal about weather modelling, how representative are the current results? Do they give a picture that is essentially correct but awaiting the fine detail or is there considerable room for variation at this distance out? -- Pete Lawrence http://www.pbl33.co.uk Most recent images http://www.pbl33.fast24.co.uk/recent_images.html |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pete Lawrence" wrote in message ... I think people would be interested to know what the chances are that they will be able to see something of this event. Not knowing a great dal about weather modelling, how representative are the current results? Do they give a picture that is essentially correct but awaiting the fine detail or is there considerable room for variation at this distance out? *considerable* variation at this lead time ... which is one reason I have not bothered to cross-post at this time. Even 3 or 4 days out (with the situation that is developing), we are going to have problems. As someone said in uk.sci.weather, even if the forecast *looks* disappointing, I would plan for a sighting at least _sometime_ during the expected event. We are going to be mighty unlucky to see nothing at all for the full 6-odd hours! Martin. (Rowley) -- FAQ & Glossary for uk.sci.weather at:- http://homepage.ntlworld.com/booty.weather/uswfaqfr.htm |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here, as promised, a summary of thoughts on cloudiness on 8th June ...
we've been running this over in uk.sci.weather for a week, and the models are all over the place! They still haven't really settled down .... not a surprise really ... so treat the text below as a 'without guarantee' stab at things: I suspect that even next Sunday, we're going to be struggling with this one given the climatology at this time of year:- Forecast discussion: Venus transit 2004 Jun 08 2004 Jun 01: D-07: GFS EC GME (JMA n/a) Synoptic: GFS: Low ... (slow-moving) SW of area Shannon. High ... Norwegian Sea. High ... northern North Sea, with ridge extending across NW Germany, intensifying. Trough ... N.Biscay/Brittany - SW Ireland early, moving NE, lying Cotentin peninsula - SW Wales - central Ireland by midday/8th. EC (yesterday's 12Z): Low ... south of Iceland. Low ... (thundery?) Biscay. High ... Heligoland Bight into Germany. Frontal trough ... SW England - West Wales - Forth. GME: Low ... SE Biscay. Low ... (complex) SSW of Iceland. High ... just east of Scotland. Trough ... N/S Denmark/South Norway. Run-to-run evolution: all deterministic runs show relatively high pressure North Sea, Low Countries, NW Germany & NE France. GFS/EC show the idea (as the GFS yesterday) of some sort of 'plumey' development Biscay to NW France - across SW Britain, extending NE'wards. (NB: some of our earlier runs also indicated such). These runs all tend to support a rather 'blocked' pattern, with HP the dominant theme NW mainland Europe, but tendency to slightly more mobility towards the westnorthwest. (Have just seen the 06Z GFS run and this doesn't develop the plume so much from / across the SW!) Inference: main areas at high prob (80%) of extensive & persistent cloud cover based on these output would appear to be: Brittany, all SW England, much of Wales (though with a fine start), and perhaps into CS England, the Midlands and parts of southern Ireland. All other areas should have a 60% of sighting, *at some time*, though with a slack flow and moist low level air, some cloudy infill is indicated for central-northern France and SE England, with medium-level unstable cloud also likely to be a factor. Also, low cloud may be a problem for east/NE England and E/SE Scotland with a flow off the North Sea. Some far NW parts of both Ireland & Scotland may also have large amounts of cloud. WARNING: THIS IS *NOT* A NAKED-EYE EVENT! TAKE APPROPRIATE PRECAUTIONS. For more details see:- http://www.transitofvenus2004.org.uk/ and more generally:- http://www.britastro.org/main/ -- Martin Rowley meteorology @ bracknell E: W: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/booty.weather/metindex.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Policy | 145 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (Long Text) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | UK Astronomy | 3 | December 25th 03 10:41 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (LONG TEXT) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | SETI | 2 | December 25th 03 07:33 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 25th 03 05:21 AM |