![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What's a good place to get a light pollution filter for my scope?
Explorer 130m with 1.25" fitting. Also, It has been reccommended that I get a better Barlow lens - is there a disadvantage in getting a higher power than the 2X that was supplied? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What's a good place to get a light pollution filter for my scope?
Explorer 130m with 1.25" fitting. Also, It has been reccommended that I get a better Barlow lens - is there a disadvantage in getting a higher power than the 2X that was supplied? There are different kinds of light pollution filters. Roughly they fall into three categories: (1) Broadband: eliminate some of the light. (2) Narrowband: eliminate a lot of the light but also dim objects more. Both are best with emission nebula and older low-pressure lighting. (3) bandpass: OIII, Ha etc. These pass just a specific very narrow range. They can really darken the sky while not taking very much off of emission nebula. You do need to be careful to let your eyes dark adapt. As a very general rule of thumb, the more restriction, the bigger your scope needs to be. That makes sense when you remember your filter is going to stop a lot of light, so you need more light at the start. I'd recommend finding a local astro club and going to a public night. You can probably try several filters and see what you like. It depends on your scope as well as the type of light pollution and what objects you want to observe. Ditto for the barlow. Wait until you have some observing time and find out what eyepieces/magnification you are going to end up using the most. Clear Skies Chuck Taylor Do you observe the moon? Try the Lunar Observing Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lunar-observing/ Lunar Picture of the Day http://www.lpod.org/ ************************************ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , CLT
writes What's a good place to get a light pollution filter for my scope? Explorer 130m with 1.25" fitting. Also, It has been reccommended that I get a better Barlow lens - is there a disadvantage in getting a higher power than the 2X that was supplied? There are different kinds of light pollution filters. Roughly they fall into three categories: (1) Broadband: eliminate some of the light. There is a new (actually very old) subset of broadband specific to eliminating low pressure sodium light. Baader Neodymium and my own Nonad photographic filter being examples of the notch reject filter. http://www.nezumi.demon.co.uk/nonad/nonad.htm It has the advantage that exposure times are not significantly increased. Sky fog is greatly attenuated and the sky remains roughly a neutral grey. I would not recommend that anyone buys a broadband LPR filter as their first choice for visual observation. Photographically they can be good. But be aware that US brands are optimised for use against mercury light pollution. (2) Narrowband: eliminate a lot of the light but also dim objects more. Both are best with emission nebula and older low-pressure lighting. Narrowband filters are more like bandpass filters than you imply. They block almost everything except nebula emission lines. Lumicon UHC and Orion (US) Ultrablock being good examples - I prefer the latter. In between is the Orion (UK) Sodium light filter which manages to do a pretty good job of blocking most output from low pressure and high pressure sodium lights and is relatively cheap compared to famous brands. It is like a highly efficient Wratten 44 cyan filter so passes nebula emissions. Surface looks metallic gold colour. Probably the best buy for a first filter in the UK/Europe if you are surrounded by sodium lights. (3) bandpass: OIII, Ha etc. These pass just a specific very narrow range. They can really darken the sky while not taking very much off of emission nebula. You do need to be careful to let your eyes dark adapt. As a very general rule of thumb, the more restriction, the bigger your scope needs to be. That makes sense when you remember your filter is going to stop a lot of light, so you need more light at the start. I'd recommend finding a local astro club and going to a public night. You can probably try several filters and see what you like. Good advice. Ditto for the barlow. Wait until you have some observing time and find out what eyepieces/magnification you are going to end up using the most. The Barlow can probably wait. Magnification isn't everything. A nice zoom eyepiece might anyway be better value for money. Regards, -- Martin Brown |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mind-2, Time waves and Theory of Everything | Yoda | Misc | 0 | April 20th 04 06:11 AM |
TOE - Possible Breakthrough Concepts | Yoda | Misc | 1 | April 14th 04 07:54 AM |
Milky Way's Big Bang | Giovanni | Astronomy Misc | 30 | January 6th 04 10:32 AM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 25th 03 05:21 AM |
Light Pollution Lobby (saga continues) | David Harris | UK Astronomy | 4 | July 4th 03 09:37 AM |