![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been experimenting with registax and my toucam.
I stacked a couple of thousand frames of M42 (through open window) and there does indeed seem to be some nebula showing. I would like some advice on these shots as there are several lines running down them. Any idea what this is? I thought it might be noise but it seems a bit excesive. I will upload them somewhere once I find a suitable place. Anyhoo, I then read about Dark Frames, so I made one using about 200 frames stacked. When I used this in Registax it deleted most of the detail in the shot so I was only left with two or three stars (greatly dimmed)and no nebula. I have thought about this and have come to the following conclusion and would like advice as to where I am wrong: Registax applies my dark frame to each frame individually (rather than the finished stack) so I should probably be using a dark frame which is made of either one frame or a small number. What is the best number? Or am I completely wrong? Also, when making the dark frame, is it important to have the camera settings the same as when capturing the image of the star etc? Regards, Stuart |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dark Matter and Dark Energy: One and the Same? | LenderBroker | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | July 14th 04 01:45 AM |
Registax and Dark Frames | W. Watson | CCD Imaging | 2 | February 13th 04 10:07 PM |
"Dark matter" forms dense clumps in ghost universe (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 21st 03 04:41 PM |
Hubble tracks down a galaxy cluster's dark matter (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 17th 03 01:42 PM |