![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Because the rover cameras are about the same height as a human, we're
getting some nice panoramas, but they would be even nicer if the rover could get up some of the hills that seem to be around in the distance. Anyone know if there are plans for Spirit to get up those hills and get a good look round? Are they even in range? - Michael |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "MichaelJP" wrote in message ... Because the rover cameras are about the same height as a human, we're getting some nice panoramas, but they would be even nicer if the rover could get up some of the hills that seem to be around in the distance. Is anyone else having trouble with the 3d views? I find the red and blue images, particularly the foreground, are too widely seperated to bring together into the 3d view. Any tips? Sam |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sam" [email protected] wrote in message ... "MichaelJP" wrote in message ... Because the rover cameras are about the same height as a human, we're getting some nice panoramas, but they would be even nicer if the rover could get up some of the hills that seem to be around in the distance. Is anyone else having trouble with the 3d views? I find the red and blue images, particularly the foreground, are too widely seperated to bring together into the 3d view. Any tips? Not exactly... when I first used virtual reality headsets a decade ago I found that I had problems getting the images to coalesce. After a bit of fiddling with the settings it turned out that my eyes are significantly further apart than average and certainly farther apart than the images were being generated. In addition to that, I have atypical image perception (one symptom of which is that I can rarely see spatial optical illusions - I perceive the actual image and not the induced one). One thing that I found helps with 3D is to focus on something in the distance and then quickly move to the 3D setup and hope that during the accommodation my perception latches onto the coalesced image and stays there for a while... Stephen |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "MichaelJP" wrote in message ... Because the rover cameras are about the same height as a human, we're getting some nice panoramas, but they would be even nicer if the rover could get up some of the hills that seem to be around in the distance. Anyone know if there are plans for Spirit to get up those hills and get a good look round? Are they even in range? - Michael I think in one of the press briefings they mentioned the hills could be upto 2km away, it might be able to reach them, it certainly could get a lot closer if they choose to. There seems to be alot of interest in them from the science team. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Elysium Fossa wrote:
I think in one of the press briefings they mentioned the hills could be upto 2km away, it might be able to reach them, it certainly could get a lot closer if they choose to. There seems to be alot of interest in them from the science team. Drive closer to them, yes, but I doubt very much if they are going to try to climb them. Clear skies, Greg -- Greg Crinklaw Astronomical Software Developer Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m) SkyTools Software for the Observer: http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html Skyhound Observing Pages: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyone know if there are plans for Spirit to get up those hills and get a
good look round? Are they even in range? - Michael They talked about this during the press conference on Saturday. They said the hills are about 2.5 km away and they are debating if that's in range. That's about the max range of the rover, but sounds like many of the scientists want to go here... so they might |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peterson, David" wrote in message om... Anyone know if there are plans for Spirit to get up those hills and get a good look round? Are they even in range? - Michael They talked about this during the press conference on Saturday. They said the hills are about 2.5 km away and they are debating if that's in range. That's about the max range of the rover, but sounds like many of the scientists want to go here... so they might I suppose it also depends on how smooth the climb would be. There would be one hell of a view though!! I guess that once the Rover is reaching the end of it's life, they might take a risk and send it somewhere more dangerous. Martin |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the plan is to drive up the hills, they don't look all that steep to
me, the Rovers can go up and down pretty steep inclines, the only limiting condition is a lateral tilt of 30 degrees or less is programmed into the safety software, the Rovers won't tip over untill 45 degrees though. #maestro chat room on irc.freenode.net Home Page: http://bellsouthpwp.net/k/h/khogue22/index.htm Join in chat at #ukweather on undernet and #usweather on Austnet. K2MAH |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Slip Sliding Away (Mars Rovers) | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 16 | March 14th 04 05:07 PM |
Save the 2009 Mars rover. . . | Tom Merkle | Policy | 24 | February 20th 04 08:07 PM |
Student Programs Tap into Mars Rover Adventures | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 12th 04 11:14 PM |
A Day in the Life of a Martian Scientist | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 3 | February 12th 04 02:55 PM |
Space Calendar - June 27, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Misc | 3 | June 28th 03 05:36 PM |