![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My interests keep moving since I discovered astronomy a few weeks
ago. I was set on getting a setup for astrophotography, but I found some binoculars at my mothers house, and now I'm hooked on bino's. I think it would be best to just observe and learn the sky. These bino's are Tasco 9x50. Judging by the view of the moon, I would say they are equivalent to a 4.5 inch Newt with a 22mm eyepiece (perhaps a tad less). Admittedly, I haven't been out of the city with these bino's, but I plan to drive up to some peak around Flagstaff. I am currently in downtown Phoenix. Assuming I want to upgrade to a better bino's, would a larger aperture be in order? I looked at reviews for large bino's and it seems that many have optical problems. I would like to spend a few hundred, but that seems to be where the problems are. The Fujinon 16x70 (600-700 $) has good reviews, but at www.bigbinoculars.com, they are backorded, and other sites don't even carry them. I think many people are rushing to Fuginon since the comet discovery using them (a $40,000 pair I would assume). Any comments or suggestions? Thanks, -Tom |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
8.4-meter Mirror Successfully Installed in Large Binocular Telescope | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 9th 04 08:06 PM |
Collinder 70 binocular object / Sky Window review | Math Heijen | Misc | 0 | January 26th 04 07:45 PM |
Kemble's Cascade (binocular observing) | orion94nl | Amateur Astronomy | 15 | December 31st 03 02:18 AM |