|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Can Someone Explain Why...
Can someone please explain why atomic weapons were tested on the Van
Allen Belts, and what effects it had and what effects we will see in the future the overall results such actions will have for the long term survival of the human race? Explain what that type of 'science' hoped to accomplish? Serious replies only, please. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Yoda wrote
Can someone please explain why atomic weapons were tested on the Van Allen Belts, and what effects it had and what effects we will see in the future the overall results such actions will have for the long term survival of the human race? Explain what that type of 'science' hoped to accomplish? Serious replies only, please. They weren't. Nuclear weapons were an international hoax perpetrated to deter China from invading Russia. America agreed to the plan to safeguard future oil supplies from Russia. All the films and photos you have seen are fakes. Hiroshima and Nagasaki have always been thriving cities, and were never bombed. The Japanese knew that they had to contribute to the plan by providing large scale film sets, to ensure the financing of their own industrial expansion after the war. They therefore temporarily rehoused the populations of both cities, while sets were built and filming took place. Work has been continuing to develop real nuclear weapons, so that the massive expense of maintaining 'the biggest lie' can be ended, but as yet, success has eluded the scientists of the world. Jeez, I thought everybody knew this! Denis -- As ye sow, so shall ye reap... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Yoda wrote
Can someone please explain why atomic weapons were tested on the Van Allen Belts, and what effects it had and what effects we will see in the future the overall results such actions will have for the long term survival of the human race? Explain what that type of 'science' hoped to accomplish? Serious replies only, please. They weren't. Nuclear weapons were an international hoax perpetrated to deter China from invading Russia. America agreed to the plan to safeguard future oil supplies from Russia. All the films and photos you have seen are fakes. Hiroshima and Nagasaki have always been thriving cities, and were never bombed. The Japanese knew that they had to contribute to the plan by providing large scale film sets, to ensure the financing of their own industrial expansion after the war. They therefore temporarily rehoused the populations of both cities, while sets were built and filming took place. Work has been continuing to develop real nuclear weapons, so that the massive expense of maintaining 'the biggest lie' can be ended, but as yet, success has eluded the scientists of the world. Jeez, I thought everybody knew this! Denis -- As ye sow, so shall ye reap... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Yoda" wrote in message t.cable.rogers.com... Can someone please explain why atomic weapons were tested on the Van Allen Belts, and what effects it had and what effects we will see in the future the overall results such actions will have for the long term survival of the human race? Explain what that type of 'science' hoped to accomplish? Serious replies only, please. As I understand it, the weapons were not test ON the Van Allen belts, but were detonated in space to examine the theory of creating artificial Van Allen belts. The idea was that if you created such a belt over the US temporarily, maybe the radiation would cause all incoming ICBM's to be fried and fall harmlessly into the atmosphere. The tests failed. The theory was incorrect. BV. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Yoda" wrote in message t.cable.rogers.com... Can someone please explain why atomic weapons were tested on the Van Allen Belts, and what effects it had and what effects we will see in the future the overall results such actions will have for the long term survival of the human race? Explain what that type of 'science' hoped to accomplish? Serious replies only, please. As I understand it, the weapons were not test ON the Van Allen belts, but were detonated in space to examine the theory of creating artificial Van Allen belts. The idea was that if you created such a belt over the US temporarily, maybe the radiation would cause all incoming ICBM's to be fried and fall harmlessly into the atmosphere. The tests failed. The theory was incorrect. BV. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Benign Vanilla" wrote in message
... "Yoda" wrote in message t.cable.rogers.com... Can someone please explain why atomic weapons were tested on the Van Allen Belts, and what effects it had and what effects we will see in the future the overall results such actions will have for the long term survival of the human race? Explain what that type of 'science' hoped to accomplish? Serious replies only, please. As I understand it, the weapons were not test ON the Van Allen belts, but were detonated in space to examine the theory of creating artificial Van Allen belts. The idea was that if you created such a belt over the US temporarily, maybe the radiation would cause all incoming ICBM's to be fried and fall harmlessly into the atmosphere. The tests failed. The theory was incorrect. I think "Yoda" is confusing the SF Movie, "Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea" with reality. http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue64/classic.html Not surprising, really. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Benign Vanilla" wrote in message
... "Yoda" wrote in message t.cable.rogers.com... Can someone please explain why atomic weapons were tested on the Van Allen Belts, and what effects it had and what effects we will see in the future the overall results such actions will have for the long term survival of the human race? Explain what that type of 'science' hoped to accomplish? Serious replies only, please. As I understand it, the weapons were not test ON the Van Allen belts, but were detonated in space to examine the theory of creating artificial Van Allen belts. The idea was that if you created such a belt over the US temporarily, maybe the radiation would cause all incoming ICBM's to be fried and fall harmlessly into the atmosphere. The tests failed. The theory was incorrect. I think "Yoda" is confusing the SF Movie, "Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea" with reality. http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue64/classic.html Not surprising, really. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
You haven't got a f***n clue do ya?
Benign Vanilla wrote: "Yoda" wrote in message t.cable.rogers.com... Can someone please explain why atomic weapons were tested on the Van Allen Belts, and what effects it had and what effects we will see in the future the overall results such actions will have for the long term survival of the human race? Explain what that type of 'science' hoped to accomplish? Serious replies only, please. As I understand it, You don't understand a damn thing do ya? I asked for science, not your pathetic 'understanding'. You're a joke! the weapons were not test ON the Van Allen belts, Again you haven't got a clue do ya? but were detonated in space to examine the theory of creating artificial Van Allen belts. Again you haven't got a clue do ya? The idea was that if you created such a belt over the US temporarily, maybe the radiation would cause all incoming ICBM's to be fried and fall harmlessly into the atmosphere. Again you don't know too much about atomic weapons, nor their effects on the atmosphere, and especially on the Van Allen Belts. The tests failed. The theory was incorrect. BV. Maybe you should do some *real* before you spout your dumbass theories for all to see. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
You haven't got a f***n clue do ya?
Benign Vanilla wrote: "Yoda" wrote in message t.cable.rogers.com... Can someone please explain why atomic weapons were tested on the Van Allen Belts, and what effects it had and what effects we will see in the future the overall results such actions will have for the long term survival of the human race? Explain what that type of 'science' hoped to accomplish? Serious replies only, please. As I understand it, You don't understand a damn thing do ya? I asked for science, not your pathetic 'understanding'. You're a joke! the weapons were not test ON the Van Allen belts, Again you haven't got a clue do ya? but were detonated in space to examine the theory of creating artificial Van Allen belts. Again you haven't got a clue do ya? The idea was that if you created such a belt over the US temporarily, maybe the radiation would cause all incoming ICBM's to be fried and fall harmlessly into the atmosphere. Again you don't know too much about atomic weapons, nor their effects on the atmosphere, and especially on the Van Allen Belts. The tests failed. The theory was incorrect. BV. Maybe you should do some *real* before you spout your dumbass theories for all to see. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Please try to accept the difference between
"a theory" which can be tested, and possibly proved wrong or, in time accepted as true, until something better comes along, and "fantasy", which while more entertaining over a limited time span is rather puerile. jc -- http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/jc_atm/ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.723 / Virus Database: 479 - Release Date: 19/07/2004 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Scientists explain mysterious plasma jets on the Sun (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 28th 04 07:54 PM |
PDF (Planetary Distance Formula) explains DW 2004 / Quaoar and Kuiper Belt | hermesnines | Astronomy Misc | 10 | February 27th 04 02:14 AM |
New Solar System Model that explains DW 2004 / Quaoar / Kuiper Belt and Pluto | hermesnines | Misc | 0 | February 24th 04 08:49 PM |
Someone please explain this to me (maximum magnification) | Carlos Moreno | Amateur Astronomy | 9 | September 8th 03 05:48 PM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |