![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
you might check out the FAQ here http://www.liftport.com/ they have answered
a lot of questions here that I would have never thought of. Most especially avoiding debris ![]() They also figure the cable will have a natural 7 hour resonance the can be actively damped and LOTs of other issues that are answered. Charles -If Bill Gates had a nickel for every time Windows crashed... oh wait, he does.- "|-|erc" wrote in message ... "G. Orme" wrote in |-|erc wrote: G. Orme" wrote I don't think it is restricted to one orbit, it can come from all directions. Also even if it came from certain directions more often then if shaped to handle that an unlucky strike could severely damage it. Rod wrote: also consider what sort of debris your cable is up against. In LEO it will be mostly man made and in an equatorial orbit, thus shaping your cable would seem to make sense. How about good ole earth cable? lowest overall cross section to tension. Ahh I get it, least probability of catastrophic failure VS least probability of damage. Surely a simulation would arrive at the answer, 1/4 of an arc is vulnerable to critical angle of attack, semicircle is vulnerable to 2 holes, so around 1/3 of an arc. 3 cables would be the best design with spacers, that way at most 2 are knocked out by a small projectile. O o o o O o o o o O composite design Herc So you think may be 1/3 of an arc would be optimial? The way I see it the answer is fairly critical. Assuming when they build it for weight reasons it will be as light as possible relative to the debris so the risk of catastrophic damage will be high. Then they would build in safety margins but these would be as low as possible so as not to add on too much weight. After that point that may decide to make it thicker to carry more weight in which case they may be free to consider other shapes. For example an arc is easier for a cable car to grip on than a hollow cylinder. Separate cables with spacers becomes similar to a mesh where the fibres are arranged vertically and horizontally with large holes in between to localise the damage from debris. I'll have to get back to you on the 1/3 figure, my simulator's a bit slow. http://www.a1sites.com/spacecable.html Seems a semicircle gets taken out first, and the 1/4 arc is almost invisible to most angles of attack, would require a lot of simulations to detect a flat cable is the most catastrophic as on a typical run it seems to performs the best i.e. the lower the fraction of the arc the less visible to attack, but also the greatest risk of a 'wipeout' in 1 hit. So my new design is 2 flat cables at say right angles, each with a small risk of total failure during which the single cable left can suffice until repair. Herc |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Our Moon as BattleStar | Rick Sobie | Astronomy Misc | 93 | February 8th 04 09:31 PM |
DDRDE model of 4D space (curved 3D space w/ invertibility) | Scandere | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 15th 04 12:57 AM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |
U.S. Space Weather Service in Deep Trouble | Al Jackson | Policy | 1 | September 25th 03 08:21 PM |